journal article·2023-04-14Open access

Assessing the Impact of AR HUDs and Risk Level on User Experience in Self-Driving Cars: Results from a Realistic Driving Simulation

Seungju Kim, Jungseok Oh, Minwoo Seong, Eunki Jeon, Yeon-Kug Moon, Seungjun Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 8

Abstract

The adoption of self-driving technologies requires addressing public concerns about their reliability and trustworthiness. To understand how user experience in self-driving vehicles is influenced by the level of risk and head-up display (HUD) information, using virtual reality (VR) and a motion simulator, we simulated risky situations including accidents with HUD information provided under different conditions. The findings revealed how HUD information related to the immediate environment and the accident’s severity influenced the user experience (UX). Further, we investigated galvanic skin response (GSR) and self-reported emotion (Valence and Arousal) annotation data and analyzed correlations between them. The results indicate significant differences and correlations between GSR data and self-reported annotation data depending on the level of risk and whether or not information was provisioned through HUD. Hence, VR simulations combined with motion platforms can be used to observe the UX (trust, perceived safety, situation awareness, immersion and presence, and reaction to events) of self-driving vehicles while controlling the road conditions such as risky situations. Our results indicate that HUD information provision significantly increases trust and situation awareness of the users, thus improving the user experience in self-driving vehicles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Traffic and Road Safety · Safety Warnings and Signage

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, School of Integrated Technology, Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea

Korea Electronics Technology Institute, Seongnam-si 13509, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Creative Content Agency · Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism in 2022

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Public perceptions of autonomous vehicle safety: An international comparison10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.022 ↗
2. Control Strategies on Path Tracking for Autonomous Vehicle: State of the Art and Future Challenges10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020075 ↗
3. How can we know a self-driving car is safe?10.1007/s10676-021-09602-1 ↗
4. Cysneiros, L.M., Raffi, M., and do Prado Leite, J.C.S. (2018, January 20–24). Software transparency as a key requirement for self-driving cars. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 26th international requirements engineering conference (RE), Banff, AB, Canada.10.1109/RE.2018.00-21 ↗
5. Atakishiyev, S., Salameh, M., Yao, H., and Goebel, R. (2021). Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Overview and Field Guide for Future Research Directions. arXiv.
6. Shen, Y., Jiang, S., Chen, Y., Yang, E., Jin, X., Fan, Y., and Campbell, K.D. (2020). To explain or not to explain: A study on the necessity of explanations for autonomous vehicles. arXiv.
7. Murugan, S., Sampathkumar, A., Kanaga Suba Raja, S., Ramesh, S., Manikandan, R., and Gupta, D. (2022). Virtual and Augmented Reality for Automobile Industry: Innovation Vision and Applications, Springer.
8. Colley, M., Bräuner, C., Lanzer, M., Walch, M., Baumann, M., and Rukzio, E. (2020, January 21–22). Effect of visualization of pedestrian intention recognition on trust and cognitive load. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Virtual.10.1145/3409120.3410648 ↗
9. Ajenaghughrure, I.B., da Costa Sousa, S.C., and Lamas, D. (2020, January 6–8). Risk and Trust in artificial intelligence technologies: A case study of Autonomous Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI), Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/HSI49210.2020.9142686 ↗
10. Building trust in autonomous vehicles: Role of virtual reality driving simulators in HMI design10.1109/TVT.2019.2933601 ↗
11. Sherman, W.R., and Craig, A.B. (2018). Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, And Design, Morgan Kaufmann.10.1016/B978-0-12-800965-9.00010-6 ↗
12. Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.016 ↗
13. Seo, H.J., Park, G.M., Son, M., and Hong, A.J. (2021). Establishment of virtual-reality-based safety education and training system for safety engagement. Educ. Sci., 11.10.3390/educsci11120786 ↗
14. Nascimento, A.M., Queiroz, A.C.M., Vismari, L.F., Bailenson, J.N., Cugnasca, P.S., Junior, J.B.C., and de Almeida, J.R. (2019, January 9–11). The role of virtual reality in autonomous vehicles’ safety. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR), San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/AIVR46125.2019.00017 ↗
15. Colley, M., Walch, M., and Rukzio, E. (2019, January 21–25). For a better (simulated) world: Considerations for VR in external communication research. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings, Utrecht, The Netherlands.10.1145/3349263.3351523 ↗
16. Tarnowski, P., Kołodziej, M., Majkowski, A., and Rak, R.J. (2018, January 9–12). Combined analysis of GSR and EEG signals for emotion recognition. Proceedings of the 2018 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW), Swinoujscie, Poland.10.1109/IIPHDW.2018.8388342 ↗
17. Dear-mulsemedia: Dataset for emotion analysis and recognition in response to multiple sensorial media10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.007 ↗
18. (2023, January 05). PS-3TM-LP550. Available online: https://motionsystems.eu/product/motion-platforms/ps-3tm-lp550/.
19. A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.028 ↗
20. The role of nonlinear dynamics in affective valence and arousal recognition10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.30 ↗
21. Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549 ↗
22. Hewitt, C., Politis, I., Amanatidis, T., and Sarkar, A. (2019, January 17–20). Assessing public perception of self-driving cars: The autonomous vehicle acceptance model. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Marina del Ray, CA, USA.10.1145/3301275.3302268 ↗
23. VRUSE—A computerised diagnostic tool: For usability evaluation of virtual/synthetic environment systems10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00047-7 ↗
24. Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.010 ↗
25. Measurement of multimodal physiological signals for stimulation detection by wearable devices10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109966 ↗
26. Tell Me What I Need To Know: Consumers’ Desire for Information Transparency in Self-Driving Vehicles10.1177/1071181321651240 ↗
27. Petersen, L., Robert, L., Yang, X.J., and Tilbury, D.M. (2019). Situational awareness, drivers trust in automated driving systems and secondary task performance. arXiv.10.2139/ssrn.3345543 ↗
28. Canedo, D., and Neves, A.J. (2019). Facial expression recognition using computer vision: A systematic review. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9214678 ↗
29. Attention mechanism-based CNN for facial expression recognition10.1016/j.neucom.2020.06.014 ↗
30. Region attention networks for pose and occlusion robust facial expression recognition10.1109/TIP.2019.2956143 ↗
31. A machine learning model for emotion recognition from physiological signals10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101646 ↗
32. Dar, M.N., Akram, M.U., Khawaja, S.G., and Pujari, A.N. (2020). CNN and LSTM-based emotion charting using physiological signals. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20164551 ↗
33. Gupta, K., Lazarevic, J., Pai, Y.S., and Billinghurst, M. (2020, January 1–4). Affectivelyvr: Towards vr personalized emotion recognition. Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Virtual.10.1145/3385956.3422122 ↗
34. EmoCo: Visual analysis of emotion coherence in presentation videos
35. Wei, Z., Zhang, J., Lin, Z., Lee, J.Y., Balasubramanian, N., Hoai, M., and Samaras, D. (2020, January 13–19). Learning visual emotion representations from web data. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01312 ↗