journal article·2022-03

An Easy, Simple, and Accessible Web-based Machine Learning Platform, SimPL-ML

Seunghun Jang, Gyoung S. Na, Jungho Lee, Jung Ho Shin, Hyun Woo Kim, Hyunju Chang

Publisher page

Abstract

Most machine learning (ML) platforms used in materials science provide prediction models built using a computational database. However, to provide more practical and accurate material property predictions, it is advantageous to build a prediction model with user’s own data. Here, we present a web-based ML platform, SimPL-ML (https://www.simpl-ml.org) that enables the user to build an ML prediction model through a simple process using their own data. Our platform, SimPL-ML, comprises four main parts: a dataset editor for dataset preprocessing, a model generator to perform actual model training, a predictor to provide a predicted target value for an arbitrary input, and a band-gap predictor (as an example case study) to predict the band gap of inorganic materials through several optimized band gap prediction models. In addition to its core functions, SimPL-ML provides additional functions such as atomic feature generation and hyper-parameter optimization for efficient ML research. We expect our platform to facilitate more accurate and efficient materials research through ML.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Butler KT, Davies DW, Cartwright H, Isayev O, Walsh A (2018) Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559:547–55510.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
2. Xie T, Grossman JC (2018) Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys Rev Lett 120:14530110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
3. Ward L, Agrawal A, Choudhary A, Wolverton C (2016) A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. NPJ Comput Mater 2:20162810.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
4. Cai J, Chu X, Xu K, Li H, Wei J (2020) Machine learning-driven new material discovery. Nanoscale Adv 2:3115–313010.1039/D0NA00388C ↗
5. Jha D, Choudhary K, Tavazza F, Liao W, Choudhary A, Campbell C, Agrawal A (2019) Enhancing materials property prediction by leveraging computational and experimental data using deep transfer learning. Nat Commun 10:531610.1038/s41467-019-13297-w ↗
6. Clement CL, Kauwe SK, Sparks TD (2020) Benchmark AFLOW data sets for machine learning. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:153–15610.1007/s40192-020-00174-4 ↗
7. Hansen K, Biegler F, Ramakrishnan R, Pronobis W, Lilienfeld OA, Müller KR, Tkatchenko A (2015) Machine learning predictions of molecular properties: accurate many-body potentials and nonlocality in chemical space. J Phys Chem Lett 6:2326–233110.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00831 ↗
8. Binder A, Bockmayr M, Hägele M, Wienert S, Heim D, Hellweg K, Ishii M, Stenzinger A, Hocke A, Denkert C, Müller KR, Klauschen F (2021) Morphological and molecular breast cancer profiling through explainable machine learning. Nat Mach Intell 3:355–36610.1038/s42256-021-00303-4 ↗
9. Heinen S, Rudorff GF, Lilienfeld OA (2021) Toward the design of chemical reactions: Machine learning barriers of competing mechanisms in reactant space. J Chem Phys 155:06410510.1063/5.0059742 ↗
10. Tkatchenko A (2020) Machine learning for chemical discovery. Nat Commun 11:412510.1038/s41467-020-17844-8 ↗
11. Deringer VL, Caro MA, Csányi G (2019) Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science. Adv Mater 31:190276510.1002/adma.201902765 ↗
12. Na GS, Jang S, Chang H (2021) Predicting thermoelectric properties from chemical formula with explicitly identifying dopant effects. NPJ Comput Mater 7:10610.1038/s41524-021-00564-y ↗
13. Na GS, Jang S, Lee YL, Chang H (2020) Tuplewise material representation based machine learning for accurate band gap prediction. J Phys Chem A 124:10616–1062310.1021/acs.jpca.0c07802 ↗
14. Artrith N, Urban A, Ceder G (2017) Efficient and accurate machine-learning interpolation of atomic energies in compositions with many species. Phys Rev B 96:01411210.1103/PhysRevB.96.014112 ↗
15. Bartel CJ, Trewartha A, Wang Q, Dunn A, Jain A, Ceder G (2020) A critical examination of compound stability predictions from machine-learned formation energies. NPJ Comput Mater 6:9710.1038/s41524-020-00362-y ↗
16. Duan C, Liu F, Nandy A, Kulik HJ (2021) Putting density functional theory to the test in machine-learning-accelerated materials discovery. J Phys Chem Lett 12:4628–463710.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00631 ↗
17. Kim HW, Lee SW, Na GS, Han SJ, Kim SK, Shin JH, Chang H, Kim YT (2021) Reaction condition optimization for non-oxidative conversion of methane using artificial intelligence. React Chem Eng 6:235–24310.1039/D0RE00378F ↗
18. AFLOW-ML http://aflow.org/aflow-ml. Accessed Oct 2021
19. JARVIS ML https://jarvis.nist.gov/jarvisml. Accessed Oct 2021
20. Kresse G, Furthmuller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
21. Olson RS, Sipper M, Cava WL, Tartarone S, Vitale S, Fu W, Orzechowski P, Urbanowicz RJ, Holmes JH, Moore JH (2017) A system for accessible artificial intelligence. arXiv 1705:00594v210.1007/978-3-319-90512-9_8 ↗
22. Amazon SageMaker (2021) https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/latest/dg/whatis.html. Accessed Dec 2021
23. Rapidminer Go (2021) https://rapidminer.com/why-rapidminer/. Accessed Dec 2021
24. Li Z, Chard R, Ward L, Chard K, Skluzacek TJ, Babuji Y, Woodard A, Tuecke S, Blaiszik B, Franklin MJ, Foster I (2021) DLHub: simplifying publication, discovery, and use of machine learning models in science. J Parallel Distrib Comput 147:64–7610.1016/j.jpdc.2020.08.006 ↗
25. Algorithmia (2021) https://algorithmia.com/. Accessed Dec 2021
26. Crankshaw D, Wang X, Zhou G, Franklin MJ, Gonzalez JE, Stoica I (2017) Clipper: a low-latency online prediction serving system. In: 14th USENIX symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI), pp 613–627
27. Jang S SimPL-ML. https://simpl-ml.org. Accessed Oct 2021
28. Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 785–79410.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
29. Gu T, Lu W, Bao X, Chen N (2006) Using support vector regression for the prediction of the band gap and melting point of binary and ternary compound semiconductors. Solid State Sci 8:129–13610.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2005.10.011 ↗
30. Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29:1189–123210.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
31. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
32. Morales-García Á, Valero R, Illas F (2017) An empirical, yet practical way to predict the band gap in solids by using density functional band structure calculations. J Phys Chem C 121:18862–1886610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07421 ↗
33. Zhuo Y, Tehrani AM, Brgoch J (2018) Predicting the band gaps of inorganic solids by machine learning. J Phys Chem Lett 9:1668–167310.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00124 ↗
34. Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/datasets. Accessed Oct 2021