journal article·2023-02-21Open access

Comparative Assessment of Variable Loads and Seismic Actions on Bridges: A Case Study in Italy Using a Multimodal Approach

Daniele Collura, Roberto Nascimbene

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 5

Abstract

The structural safety of the infrastructure stock is an important issue in modern seismic performance assessments. Following recent seismic events, reports have highlighted the increased vulnerability of physical infrastructural assets, particularly for many bridges across the Italian road and motorway network. Italy possesses one of the most complex and intricate road systems in Europe which was constructed across irregular territories in terms of plan and elevation and of varying dimensions. As such, a comparative case study is presented herein. This case study aims to characterise the seismic vulnerability of the Vizzana-Zampogna viaduct which is part of the A15 Parma-La Spezia motorway, near the locality of Selva Bocchetto. The viaduct is considered representative of the 1970s construction period. It is approximately 342 m in length and is characterized by a flat curvilinear prestressed concrete deck consisting of 15 spans simply supported on reinforced concrete piers. To better understand the seismic structural response of the individual piers of the viaduct, a “multi-modal” nonlinear static analysis was developed, which allows the effects of sectional stresses relative to the variable load profiles of the single modes to be combined through the quadratic modal combination, and to be compared with the relevant limit state. The research aims to qualitatively identify the piers most vulnerable to seismic action and to study the effects that are induced by introducing variable loads and intensity scenarios of different earthquakes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori—IUSS, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, 27100 Pavia, Italy

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Reconnaissance report on damage of bridges in 2008 Wenchuan, China, earthquake10.1080/13632460902859169 ↗
2. Seismic performance evaluation of fiber-reinforced concrete bridges under near-fault and far-field ground motions10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.049 ↗
3. Effect of bonding or unbonding on seismic behavior of bridge elastomeric bearings: Lessons learned from past earthquakes in China and Japan and inspirations for future design10.1186/s43251-021-00036-9 ↗
4. Seismic fragility evaluation of various mitigation strategies proposed for bridge piers10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.041 ↗
5. Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144) ↗
6. Seismic vulnerability analysis of irregular multi-span concrete bridges with different corrosion damage scenarios10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107678 ↗
7. Maintenance interventions period of existing RC motorway viaducts located in moderate/high seismicity zones10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.135 ↗
8. Critical issues in existing RC deck stiffened arch bridges under seismic actions10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114980 ↗
9. The Evolution of Seismic Design Provisions in Indonesia’s National Bridge Code10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2022.54.6.14 ↗
10. Highway bridges10.1193/1.1586196 ↗
11. Lessons learned about bridges from earthquake in Taiwan
12. Impact on highway structures10.1193/1.1586162 ↗
13. Ghasemi, H., Cooper, J.D., Imbsen, R., Piskin, H., Inal, F., and Tiras, A. (2023, February 09). The November 1999 Duzce earthquake: Post-earthquake investigation of the structures, TEM. Publication No. FHWARD-00–146, Available online: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/41585.
14. De Domenico, D., Messina, D., and Recupero, A. (2023). Seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete bridge piers with corroded bars. Strct. Conc.10.1002/suco.202200378 ↗
15. A comparative study of RC bridge for evaluation of seismic performance and retrofit technology10.1007/s41062-020-00424-6 ↗
16. Numerical Study on the Collapse of the Morandi Bridge10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001428 ↗
17. Once upon a Time in Italy: The Tale of the Morandi Bridge10.1080/10168664.2018.1558033 ↗
18. Collapse analysis of the multi-span reinforced concrete arch bridge of Caprigliola, Italy10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113375 ↗
19. Ghazal, H., and Mwafy, A. (2022). Seismic fragility assessment of an existing multi-span RC bridge equipped with risk mitigation systems. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12070982 ↗
20. A new method of seismic retrofitting cost analysis and effectiveness for reinforced concrete structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113083 ↗
21. Seismic reliability of reinforced concrete bridges subject to environmental deterioration and strengthened with FRCM composites10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106224 ↗
22. Experimental study of a reinforced concrete bridge pier strengthened with HPFRC jacketing10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110355 ↗
23. Seismic Retrofitting of Prestressed Concrete Bridges through Friction Pendulum Isolation Bearings10.1007/978-3-030-91877-4_69 ↗
24. Experimental seismic assessment of the effectiveness of isolation techniques for the seismic protection of existing RC bridges10.1007/978-3-319-56136-3_6 ↗
25. Implementation of smart-passive dampers combined with double concave friction pendulum devices to retrofit an existing highway viaduct exploiting the seismic early warning information10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.026 ↗
26. Cakebread, T. (2010, January 11–15). The role of finite element analysis in bridge assessment and design. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.1201/b10430-369 ↗
27. Advanced finite element model of TSING MA bridge for structural health monitoring10.1142/S0219455411004117 ↗
28. Fragility-based seismic performance assessment of modular underground arch bridges10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.005 ↗
29. Seismic fragility analysis of RC bridges in high seismic regions under horizontal and simultaneous horizontal and vertical excitations10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.021 ↗
30. Seismic fragility of bridges: An approach coupling multiple-stripe analysis and Gaussian mixture for multicomponent structures10.1177/87552930211036164 ↗
31. Surrogate-based fragility analysis and probabilistic optimisation of cable-stayed bridges subject to seismic loads10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113949 ↗
32. Drive-by-bridge inspection for damage identification in a cable-stayed bridge: Numerical investigations10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110891 ↗
33. Interpretation of sensor data from in situ tests on a transversely bonded fibre-reinforced polymer road bridge10.1177/1475921718779403 ↗
34. A deep learning-aided seismic fragility analysis method for bridges10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.058 ↗
35. Minnucci, L., Scozzese, F., Carbonari, S., Gara, F., and Dall’Asta, A. (2022). Innovative Fragility-Based Method for Failure Mechanisms and Damage Extension Analysis of Bridges. Infrastructures, 7.10.3390/infrastructures7090122 ↗
36. A procedure for combining vertical and horizontal seismic action effects10.1080/13632460109350404 ↗
37. Impact of vertical ground motion on the statistical analysis of seismic demand for frictional isolated bridge in near-fault regions10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115512 ↗
38. Unified hazard models for risk assessment of transportation networks in a multi-hazard environment10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102960 ↗
39. Total risk model and loss analysis of probabilistic damage control application in seismic design of highway bridges10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001843 ↗
40. Comparative assessment of seismic collapse risk for non-ductile and ductile bridges: A case study in China10.1007/s10518-020-00946-5 ↗
41. (2023, February 12). NTC 2018–Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni (NTC) Decreto Ministeriale, 17 January 2018 (In Italian). Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Rome, Italy. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it.
42. Picinotti, P.F. (2017). Relazione Illustrativa di Microzonazione Sismica del Comune di Terenzo, Regione Emilia-Romagna. (In Italian).
43. Hashash, Y.M.A., Musgrove, M.I., Harmon, J.A., Ilhan, O., Xing, G., Numanoglu, O., Groholski, D.R., Phillips, C.A., and Park, D. (2020). DEEPSOIL 7, User Manual, Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
44. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M. (1970). Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analyses, Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Technical Report.
45. Newmark, N.M., and Hall, W.J. (1982). Earthquake Spectra and Design, Engineering Monographs, EERI.
46. Le azioni sismiche e le categorie di sottosuolo
47. Liberatore, D., and Pagliaroli, A. (2023, February 10). Verifica della sicurezza sismica dei Musei Statali. Applicazione O.P.C.M. 3274/2003 s.m.i. e della Direttiva P.C.M. 12.10.2007. Convenzione Arcus–DG Rep. n. 113/2011 del 30/09/2011. Convenzione DG–Consorzio ReLUIS Rep. n. 21/2011 del 26/10/2011. Responsabile Scientifico: Domenico Liberatore. Referente Tecnico: Luigi Sorrentino (In Italian). Ministero della Cultura, Rome, Italy. Available online: https://www.beniculturali.it.
48. REXEL: Computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1 ↗
49. Engineering design earthquakes from multimodal hazard disaggregation10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.001 ↗
50. Cetraro, F. (2019). Approccio Geotecnico Sugli Effetti Della Risposta Sismica Locale, Flaccovio Editore. (In Italian).
51. (2023, January 10). Seismosoft, “SeismoMatch–Verification Report”. Available online: www.seismosoft.com.
52. Corritore, D., and Paolacci, F. (2021, January 28–30). Performance-based earthquake engineering analysis of short-medium span steel-concrete composite bridges. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, COMPDYN 2021, Athens, Greece. Code 174550.10.7712/120121.8721.18783 ↗
53. On the cyclic behaviour of new pier-to-deck connections for short-medium span composite I-girder bridges
54. Knowledge-Based Performance Assessment of Existing RC Buildings10.1080/13632469.2010.501193 ↗
55. Large-scale seismic assessment of RC buildings through rapid visual screening10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103219 ↗
56. Flexural members with confined concrete10.1061/JSDEAG.0002957 ↗
57. A Framework for the Quantification of Non-Structural Seismic Performance Factors10.1080/13632469.2021.1991516 ↗
58. (2023, February 11). Eurocode 8–Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 2: Bridges. European Community, Bruxelles, Belgium. Available online: http://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu.
59. Leger, P., Wilson, E.L., and Clough, R.W. (1986). The Use of Load Dependent Vectors for Dynamic and Earthquake Analyses, University of California, Berkeley. Earthquake Engineering Research Center report.
60. Multimodal Pushover Analysis for R.C. Bridges10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.725-726.888 ↗
61. Verderame, G.M., Stella, A., and Cosenza, E. (2001, January 9–13). Le Proprietà Meccaniche degli Acciai Impiegati nelle Strutture in Ca Realizzate negli Anni’60. Proceedings of the X Congresso Nazionale L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Potenza-Matera, Italia.
62. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M., and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007). Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press. [2nd ed.].
63. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings10.1002/eqe.144 ↗
64. Practical Implementation of Generalized Force Vectors for the Multimodal Pushover Analysis of Building Structures10.1193/102412EQS316M ↗