journal article·2023-01-13Open access

Machine Learning Algorithm Accuracy Using Single- versus Multi-Institutional Image Data in the Classification of Prostate MRI Lesions

Destie Provenzano, Oleksiy Melnyk, Danish Imtiaz, Benjamin McSweeney, Daniel Nemirovsky, Michael Wynne, Michael Whalen, Yuan James Rao, Murray Loew, Shawn Haji-Momenian

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 2

Abstract

(1) Background: Recent studies report high accuracies when using machine learning (ML) algorithms to classify prostate cancer lesions on publicly available datasets. However, it is unknown if these trained models generalize well to data from different institutions. (2) Methods: This was a retrospective study using multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) data from our institution (63 mpMRI lesions) and the ProstateX-2 challenge, a publicly available annotated image set (112 mpMRI lesions). Residual Neural Network (ResNet) algorithms were trained to classify lesions as high-risk (hrPCA) or low-risk/benign. Models were trained on (a) ProstateX-2 data, (b) local institutional data, and (c) combined ProstateX-2 and local data. The models were then tested on (a) ProstateX-2, (b) local and (c) combined ProstateX-2 and local data. (3) Results: Models trained on either local or ProstateX-2 image data had high Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC)s (0.82–0.98) in the classification of hrPCA when tested on their own respective populations. AUCs decreased significantly (0.23–0.50, p < 0.01) when models were tested on image data from the other institution. Models trained on image data from both institutions re-achieved high AUCs (0.83–0.99). (4) Conclusions: Accurate prostate cancer classification models trained on single-institutional image data performed poorly when tested on outside-institutional image data. Heterogeneous multi-institutional training image data will likely be required to achieve broadly applicable mpMRI models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Advances in imaging modalities in prostate cancer10.1097/CCO.0000000000000174 ↗
2. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 210.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052 ↗
3. Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer in MRI10.1109/TMI.2014.2303821 ↗
4. Artificial Intelligence-assisted Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation10.1148/rg.2021210020 ↗
5. Machine Learning in Prostate MRI for Prostate Cancer
6. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS), a paired validating confirmatory study10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1 ↗
7. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer10.1001/jama.2014.17942 ↗
8. Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer10.1056/NEJMoa1615869 ↗
9. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer10.1056/NEJMoa1606220 ↗
10. Comparative performance of fully-automated and semi-automated artificial intelligence methods for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI, a systematic review10.1186/s13244-022-01199-3 ↗
11. PROSTATEx Challenges for computerized classification of prostate lesions from multiparametric magnetic resonance images10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.044501 ↗
12. Nolan, T., and Govindarajan, K. (2021, August 23). “SPIE-AAPM-NCI PROSTATEx Challenges (PROSTATEx).” The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Available online: https://doi.org/10.7937/K9TCIA.2017.MURS5CL.
13. Automated grading of prostate cancer using convolutional neural network and ordinal class classifier10.1016/j.imu.2019.100256 ↗
14. A Transfer Learning Approach for Malignant Prostate Lesion Detection on Multiparametric MRI10.1177/1533033819858363 ↗
15. Radiomics Features Measured with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness10.1097/JU.0000000000000272 ↗
16. Classification of Cancer at Prostate MRI, Deep Learning versus Clinical PI-RADS Assessment10.1148/radiol.2019190938 ↗
17. Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict clinically significant prostate cancer of the peripheral zone with multiparametric MRI using clinical assessment categories and radiomic features10.1007/s00330-020-07064-5 ↗
18. Castillo, T.J.M., Arif, M., Starmans, M., Niessen, W.J., Bangma, C.H., Schoots, I.G., and Veenland, J.F. (2021). Classification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multi-Parametric MRI, A Validation Study Comparing Deep Learning and Radiomics. Cancers, 14.10.3390/cancers14010012 ↗
19. Machine learning applications in prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging10.1186/s41747-019-0109-2 ↗
20. Invited Commentary, Prostate Cancer Diagnosis-Challenges and Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence10.1148/rg.2021210187 ↗
21. Federated learning improves site performance in multicenter deep learning without data sharing10.1093/jamia/ocaa341 ↗
22. ProstateX challenge data
23. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), maintaining and operating a public information repository10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 ↗
24. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
25. Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G.S., Davis, A., Dean, J., and Devin, M. (2021, August 23). TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. Available online: tensorflow.org.
26. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L., Li, K., and Li, F. (2009, January 20–25). ImageNet, A large-scale hierarchical image database. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, FL, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ↗
27. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM), A Guide for Authors and Reviewers10.1148/ryai.2020200029 ↗
28. Detection of prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI
29. Support vector machines for prostate lesion classification
30. Prostate cancer diagnosis using deep learning with 3D multiparametric MRI
31. Mehrtash, A., Sedghi, A., Ghafoorian, M., Taghipour, M., Tempany, C.M., Wells, W.M., Kapur, T., Mousavi, P., Abolmaesumi, P., and Fedorov, A. (2017, January 3). Classification of Clinical Significance of MRI Prostate Findings Using 3D Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2017: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.2277123 ↗
32. Methodologic Guide for Evaluating Clinical Performance and Effect of Artificial Intelligence Technology for Medical Diagnosis and Prediction10.1148/radiol.2017171920 ↗
33. The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine, A Review10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2631 ↗
34. Implementing Machine Learning in Radiology Practice and Research10.2214/AJR.16.17224 ↗
35. Quantitative variations in texture analysis features dependent on MRI scanning parameters, A phantom model10.1002/acm2.12482 ↗
36. On standardizing the MR image intensity scale10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199912)42:6<1072::AID-MRM11>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
37. Effects of MRI image normalization techniques in prostate cancer radiomics10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.007 ↗
38. Automated reference tissue normalization of T2-weighted MR images of the prostate using object recognition10.1007/s10334-020-00871-3 ↗
39. Castillo, T.J.M., Arif, M., Niessen, W.J., Schoots, I.G., and Veenland, J.F. (2020). Automated Classification of Significant Prostate Cancer on MRI, A Systematic Review on the Performance of Machine Learning Applications. Cancers, 12.10.3390/cancers12061606 ↗
40. Machine learning for the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI, A meta-analysis10.1007/s00330-020-07027-w ↗
41. Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation10.7326/0003-4819-137-7-200210010-00011 ↗
42. Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence10.1503/cmaj.121286 ↗
43. Genomic Profiling of Prostate Cancers from Men with African and European Ancestry10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-4112 ↗
44. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations10.1126/science.aax2342 ↗
45. Mitigating Racial Bias in Machine Learning10.1017/jme.2022.13 ↗
46. Federated learning in medicine, facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data10.1038/s41598-020-69250-1 ↗
47. (2022, June 01). NVIDIA Clara Imaging. Available online: https://developer.nvidia.com/clara-medical-imaging.
48. Tensorflow (2022, June 01). TensorFlow Federated, Machine Learning on Decentralized Data. Available online: https://www.tensorflow.org/federated.
49. IBM (2022, June 01). IBM Federated Learning. Available online: https://ibmfl.mybluemix.net/.
50. Anisotropic 3D Multi-Stream CNN for Accurate Prostate Segmentation from Multi-Planar MRI10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105821 ↗
51. MRI-Guided In-Bore Biopsy, Differences Between Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization in Primary and Secondary Biopsy Settings10.2214/AJR.15.14579 ↗
52. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma, urologic pathologists10.1053/hupa.2001.21134 ↗
53. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis10.1056/NEJMoa1801993 ↗
54. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Varies Substantially Across Radiologists10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.010 ↗
55. Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers, Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel10.1148/radiol.2020190646 ↗
56. A geographic analysis of prostate cancer mortality in the United States, 1970–198910.1002/ijc.10594 ↗
57. International epidemiology of prostate cancer, geographical distribution and secular trends10.1002/mnfr.200700511 ↗
58. Ben Ammar, L., Gasmi, K., and Ben Ltaifa, I. (2022). ViT-TB, Ensemble Learning Based ViT Model for Tuberculosis Recognition. Cybern. Systems, 1–20.10.1155/2022/8950243 ↗
59. Hybrid deep learning model for answering visual medical questions10.1007/s11227-022-04474-8 ↗