Spatial Variability in Land Subsidence and Its Relation to Groundwater Withdrawals in the Choshui Delta
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, the characterization of land subsidence with the spatial variability of soil formation and groundwater withdrawals in Choshui delta, Taiwan, is presented. Levelling surveys, borehole logging, multi-layer compaction monitoring network, multi-layer groundwater level monitoring network, and the electricity consumption of wells in the study area are adopted. Various factors, including the percentage of coarse-grained soil, percentage of fine-grained soil, length of average maximum drainage path, percentage of agricultural land use, electricity consumption of wells, and accumulated depth of land subsidence, are applied. Thematic maps based on these factors are established using geographic information system spatial analysis. A principal component analysis (PCA) is then employed to obtain the dominant factors for land subsidence. The results indicate that the largest subsidence rate is observed in the region that has both a high electricity consumption of wells and a large percentage of fine-grained soil. The PCA results reveal that the electricity consumption of wells is highly correlated with the accumulated depth of land subsidence. The first principal component is the acquired factor causing land subsidence, such as the excessive withdrawal of groundwater. The second principal component is the congenital factor causing land subsidence, which corresponds to fine sand, silty and clayey soils.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques · Groundwater and Watershed Analysis · Cryospheric studies and observations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Harbor and River Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
Department of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan 320317, Taiwan
Funding
National Science Council, Taiwan, The Republic of China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Water availability and land subsidence in the Central Valley, California, USA10.1007/s10040-015-1339-x ↗
2. Sneed, M., and Galloway, D.L. (2000). Aquifer-System Compaction and Land Subsidence: Measurements, Analyses, and Simulations: The Holly Site, Edwards Air Force Base, US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. (No. 4015).
3. Variability and climatology of precipitable water vapor from 12-year GPS observations in Taiwan10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.021 ↗
4. Transient modeling of regional rainfall-triggered shallow landslides10.1007/s12665-017-6902-4 ↗
5. Khoirunisa, N., Ku, C.Y., and Liu, C.Y. (2021). A GIS-based artificial neural network model for flood susceptibility assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18031072 ↗
6. Characterization of land subsidence in the Choshui River alluvial fan, Taiwan
7. Monitoring severe aquifer-system compaction and land subsidence in Taiwan using multiple sensors: Yunlin, the southern Choushui River Alluvial Fan10.1007/s12665-009-0139-9 ↗
8. Modeling aquifer-system compaction and predicting land subsidence in central Taiwan10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.07.018 ↗
9. Land subsidence in major cities of Central Mexico: Interpreting InSAR-derived land subsidence mapping with hydrogeological data
10. Land subsidence estimation with tide gauge and satellite radar altimetry measurements along the Texas Gulf Coast, USA10.1109/LGRS.2022.3194108 ↗
11. A three-dimensional stratigraphic model of the Mississippi River Delta, USA: Implications for river deltaic hydrogeology10.1007/s10040-020-02198-8 ↗
12. Characterization of land subsidence induced by groundwater withdrawals in the plain of Beijing city, China10.1007/s10040-013-1069-x ↗
13. Groundwater storage loss associated with land subsidence in Western United States mapped using machine learning10.1029/2019WR026621 ↗
14. Negative pore water pressure in aquitard enhances land subsidence: Field, laboratory, and numerical evidence10.1029/2021WR030085 ↗
15. The influence of clay zones on land subsidence from groundwater pumping10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00943.x ↗
16. GIS-based spatial and temporal prediction system development for regional land subsidence hazard mitigation10.1007/s00254-003-0806-1 ↗
17. Processes governing natural land subsidence in the shallow coastal aquifer of the Ravenna coast, Italy10.1016/j.catena.2018.08.019 ↗
18. Spatiotemporal analysis of extracted groundwater volumes estimated from electricity consumption10.1111/gwat.13008 ↗
19. Peng, Y., Dong, D., Chen, W., and Zhang, C. (2022). Stable regional reference frame for reclaimed land subsidence study in East China. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14163984 ↗
20. Xiao, B., Zhao, J., Li, D., Zhao, Z., Xi, W., and Zhou, D. (2022). The monitoring and analysis of land subsidence in Kunming (China) supported by time series InSAR. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141912387 ↗
21. Prediction of optimal safe ground water yield and land subsidence in the Los Banos-Kettleman City area, California, using a calibrated numerical simulation model10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00379-6 ↗
22. Leake, S.A., and Galloway, D.L. (2010). Use of the SUB-WT Package for MODFLOW to simulate aquifer-system compaction in Antelope Valley, California, USA. Land Subsidence, Associated Hazards and the Role of Natural Resources Development, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Land Subsidence, Queretaro, Mexico, 17–22 October 2010, International Association of Hydraulic Sciences.
23. Introducing dynamic land subsidence index based on the ALPRIFT framework using artificial intelligence techniques10.1007/s12145-021-00760-w ↗
24. Nadiri, A.A., Moazamnia, M., Sadeghfam, S., and Barzegar, R. (2021). Mapping Risk to Land Subsidence: Developing a Two-Level Modeling Strategy by Combining Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Artificial Intelligence Techniques. Water, 13.10.3390/w13192622 ↗
25. A study of land subsidence problems by ALPRIFT for vulnerability indexing and risk indexing and treating subjectivity by strategy at two levels10.2166/hydro.2020.247 ↗
26. (2022, June 01). Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, (In Chinese).
27. (2022, June 01). Central Geological Survey, (In Chinese).
28. (2022, June 01). National Land Surveying and Mapping Center (NLSC), Ministry of the Interior, (In Chinese).
29. Effects of coarse-grained materials on properties of residual soil10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.10.003 ↗
30. Das, B.M. (2011). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, Cengage Learning.
31. Swelling behaviour of compacted fine-grained soils10.1016/S0013-7952(03)00161-3 ↗
32. PCA in studying coordination and variability: A tutorial10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.01.005 ↗
33. Principal component analysis with optimum order sample correlation coefficient for image enhancement10.1080/01431160600606882 ↗
34. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
35. Machine learning models and algorithms for big data classification
36. Kreyszig, E. (2008). Advanced Engineering Mathematics, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
37. Response of Soil Fertility and Bacterial Community Composition to Vegetation Species in a Coal Mining Subsidence Area: A Survey After 20-Year Reclamation10.3389/fenvs.2022.937688 ↗
38. Shi, L., Gong, H., Chen, B., and Zhou, C. (2020). Land Subsidence Prediction Induced by Multiple Factors Using Machine Learning Method. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12244044 ↗
39. Temporal principal component analysis and synthetic aperture radar interference analysis of the spatial and temporal evolution of ground subsidence in the Los Angeles area10.1117/1.JRS.16.044504 ↗