journal article·2024-06Open access

A Case Study of Multimodal, Multi-institutional Data Management for the Combinatorial Materials Science Community

Sarah I. Allec, Eric S. Muckley, Nathan S. Johnson, Christopher K. H. Borg, Dylan J. Kirsch, Joshua Martin, Rohit Pant, Ichiro Takeuchi, Andrew S. Lee, James E. Saal, Logan Ward, Apurva Mehta

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Alam MM, Aktar MA, Idris NDM, Al-Amin AQ (2023) World energy economics and geopolitics amid COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 policy direction. World Dev Sustain 2:100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2023.10004810.1016/j.wds.2023.100048 ↗
2. Alberi K, Nardelli MB, Zakutayev A, Mitas L, Curtarolo S, Jain A, Fornari M, Marzari N, Takeuchi I, Green ML et al (2018) The 2019 materials design roadmap. J Phys D Appl Phys 52:013001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aad92610.1088/1361-6463/aad926 ↗
3. Ong SP (2019) Accelerating materials science with high-throughput computations and machine learning. Comput Mater Sci 161:143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.01310.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.013 ↗
4. Correa-Baena J-P, Hippalgaonkar K, van Duren J, Jaffer S, Chandrasekhar VR, Stevanovic V, Wadia C, Guha S, Buonassisi T (2018) Accelerating materials development via automation, machine learning, and high-performance computing. Joule 2:1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.00910.1016/j.joule.2018.05.009 ↗
5. Fong AY, Pellouchoud L, Davidson M, Walroth RC, Church C, Tcareva E, Wu L, Peterson K, Meredig B, Tassone CJ (2021) Utilization of machine learning to accelerate colloidal synthesis and discovery. J Chem Phys 154:224201. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.004738510.1063/5.0047385 ↗
6. Ling J, Hutchinson M, Antono E, Paradiso S, Meredig B (2017) High-dimensional materials and process optimization using data-driven experimental design with well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0098-z10.1007/s40192-017-0098-z ↗
7. Himanen L, Geurts A, Foster AS, Rinke P (2019) Data-driven materials science: Status, challenges, and perspectives. Adv Sci 6:1900808. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20190080810.1002/advs.201900808 ↗
8. Open science. https://openscience.com. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
9. Foster. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
10. Chesbrough H (2006) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Brighton, MA10.1093/oso/9780199290727.001.0001 ↗
11. McKiernan EC, Bourne PE, Brown CT, Buck S, Kenall A, Lin J, McDougall D, Nosek BA, Ram K, Soderberg CK et al (2016) Point of view: how open science helps researchers succeed. eLife 5:e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.1680010.7554/eLife.16800 ↗
12. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten J-W, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE et al (2016) The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3:160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.1810.1038/sdata.2016.18 ↗
13. Scientific data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
14. Sharing research data for journal authors. https://www.elsevier.com/authors/author-services/research-data. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
15. (2023) Public access plan: ‘Ensuring free, immediate and equitable access’ to the results of Department of Energy Scientific Research, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.11578/2023DOEPublicAccessPlan10.11578/2023DOEPublicAccessPlan ↗
16. Jain A, Ong SP, Hautier G, Chen W, Richards WD, Dacek S, Cholia S, Gunter D, Skinner D, Ceder G, Persson KA (2013) Commentary: The materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater 1:011002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
17. Saal JE, Kirklin S, Aykol M, Meredig B, Wolverton C (2013) Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD). JOM 65:1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-410.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
18. Kirklin S, Saal JE, Meredig B, Thompson A, Doak JW, Aykol M, Rühl S, Wolverton C (2015) The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies. npj Comput Mater 1:15010. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.1010.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
19. Suram SK, Newhouse PF, Zhou L, Van Campen DG, Mehta A, Gregoire JM (2016) High throughput light absorber discovery, part 2: Establishing structure–band gap energy relationships. ACS Comb Sci 18:682–688. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscombsci.6b0005410.1021/acscombsci.6b00054 ↗
20. Li YJ, Savan A, Kostka A, Stein HS, Ludwig A (2018) Accelerated atomic-scale exploration of phase evolution in compositionally complex materials. Mater Horiz 5:86. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MH00486A10.1039/C7MH00486A ↗
21. Stein HS, Guevarra D, Shinde A, Jones RJR, Gregoire JM, Haber JA (2019) Functional mapping reveals mechanistic clusters for OER catalysis across (Cu–Mn–Ta–Co–Sn–Fe)Ox composition and pH space. Mater Horiz 6:1251. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8MH01641K10.1039/C8MH01641K ↗
22. Maier WF, Stöwe K, Sieg S (2007) Combinatorial and high-throughput materials science. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:6016. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20060367510.1002/anie.200603675 ↗
23. Talley KR, Bauers SR, Melamed CL, Papac MC, Heinselman KN, Khan I, Roberts DM, Jacobson V, Mis A, Brennecka GL, Perkins JD, Zakutayev A (2019) Combigor: data-analysis package for combinatorial materials science. ACS Comb Sci 21:537. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscombsci.9b0007710.1021/acscombsci.9b00077 ↗
24. Takeuchi I, Long CJ, Famodu OO, Murakami M, Hattrick-Simpers J, Rubloff GW, Stukowski M, Rajan K (2005) Data management and visualization of x-ray diffraction spectra from thin film ternary composition spreads. Rev Sci Instrum 76:062223. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.192707910.1063/1.1927079 ↗
25. Zakutayev A, Wunder N, Schwarting M, Perkins JD, White R, Munch K, Tumas W, Phillips C (2018) An open experimental database for exploring inorganic materials. Sci Data 5:180053. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.5310.1038/sdata.2018.53 ↗
26. Foster I (2011) Globus online: accelerating and democratizing science through cloud-based services. IEE Internet Comput 15:70. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2011.6410.1109/MIC.2011.64 ↗
27. Allen B, Bresnahan J, Childers L, Foster I, Kandaswamy G, Kettimuthu R, Kordas J, Link M, Martin S, Pickett K, Tuecke S (2012) Software as a service for data scientists. Commun ACM 55:81. https://doi.org/10.1145/2076450.207646810.1145/2076450.2076468 ↗
28. Shi XL, Zou J, Chen ZG (2020) Advanced thermoelectric design: from materials and structures to devices. Chem Rev 120(15):7399–7515. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0002610.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00026 ↗
29. Fielding RT (2000) Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures. PhD thesis, University of California Irvine
30. Harris, R Svelte. https://svelte.dev/. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
31. Ronacher A Flask. https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/2.3.x/. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
32. Chard K, Dart E, Foster I, Shifflett D, Tuecke S, Williams J (2018) The modern research data portal: a design pattern for networked, data-intensive science. PeerJ Comput Sci 4:e144. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.14410.7717/peerj-cs.144 ↗
33. Heroku. Available at https://www.heroku.com/. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
34. Hammer-Lahav E (2010) The OAuth 1.0 Protocol, RFC 5849. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/pdfrfc/rfc5849.txt.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 202310.17487/rfc5849 ↗
35. Sakimura N, Bradley J, Jones M (2014) OpenID Connect Dynamic Client Registration 1.0 incorporating errata set 1. https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-registration-1_0.html. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
36. Sakimura N, Bradley J, Jones M, de Medeiros B, Mortimore C (2014) OpenID Connect Core 1.0 incorporating errata set 1. https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
37. Sakimura N, Bradley J, Jones M, Jay E (2014) OpenID Connect Discovery 1.0 incorporating errata set 1. https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-discovery-1_0.html. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
38. de Pablo JJ, Jones B, Kovacs CL, Ozolins V, Ramirez AP (2014) The materials genome initiative, the interplay of experiment, theory and computation. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 18:99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2014.02.00310.1016/j.cossms.2014.02.003 ↗
39. National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology Subcommittee on the Materials Genome Initiative (2021) Materials Genome Initiative strategic plan. National Science and Technology Council, Washington, DC. https://www.mgi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/MGI-2021-Strategic-Plan.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
40. Krahl R, Darroch L, Huber R, Devaraju A, Klump J, Habermann T, Stocker M, The Research Data Alliance Persistent Identification of Instruments Working Group members (2021) Metadata schema for the persistent identification of instruments. Research Data Alliance. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA0007010.15497/RDA00070 ↗
41. React. https://react.dev/. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
42. Bootstrap. https://getbootstrap.com/. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
43. Bootstrap Icons. https://icons.getbootstrap.com/. Accessed 30 Aug 2023
44. Nikolaev P, Hooper D, Webber F, Rao R, Decker K, Krein M, Poleski J, Barto R, Maruyama B (2016) Autonomy in materials research: a case study in carbon nanotube growth. npj Comput Mater 2:16031. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.3110.1038/npjcompumats.2016.31 ↗
45. Kusne AG, Gao T, Mehta A, Ke L, Nguyen MC, Ho K-M, Antropov V, Wang C-Z, Kramer MJ, Long C, Takeuchi I (2014) On-the-fly machine-learning for high-throughput experiments: search for rare-earth-free permanent magnets. Sci Rep 4:6367. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0636710.1038/srep06367 ↗
46. Ley SV, Fitzpatrick DE, Ingham RJ, Myers RM (2015) Organic synthesis: March of the machines. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:3449. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20141074410.1002/anie.201410744 ↗
47. Kitson PJ, Marie G, Francoia J-P, Zalesskiy SS, Sigerson RC, Mathieson JS, Cronin L (2018) Digitization of multistep organic synthesis in reactionware for on-demand pharmaceuticals. Science 359:314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao346610.1126/science.aao3466 ↗
48. Rahmanian F, Flowers J, Guevarra D, Richter M, Fichtner M, Donnely P, Gregoire JM, Stein HS (2022) Enabling modular autonomous feedback-loops in materials science through hierarchical experimental laboratory automation and orchestration. Adv Mater Interfaces 9:2101987. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20210198710.1002/admi.202101987 ↗
49. Deneault JR, Chang J, Myung J, Hooper D, Armstrong A, Pitt M, Maruyama B (2021) Toward autonomous additive manufacturing: Bayesian optimization on a 3D printer. MRS Bull 46:566. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-021-00051-110.1557/s43577-021-00051-1 ↗
50. Elias JR, Chard R, Libera JA, Foster I, Chaudhuri S (2020) The manufacturing data and machine learning platform: enabling real-time monitoring and control of scientific experiments via IoT. In: 2020 IEEE 6th world forum on internet of things (WF-IoT), New Orleans, LA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/WF-IoT48130.2020.922107810.1109/WF-IoT48130.2020.9221078 ↗
51. Sim M, Ghazi Vakili M, Strieth-Kalthoff F, Hao H, Hickman R, Miret S, Pablo-García S, Aspuru-Guzik A (2023) ChemOS 2.0: an orchestration architecture for chemical self-driving laboratories. ChemRxiv. This content is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-v2khf10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-v2khf ↗
52. Statt MJ, Rohr BA, Guevarra D, Suram SK, Morrell TE, Gregoire JM (2023) The materials provenance store. Sci Data 10:184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02107-010.1038/s41597-023-02107-0 ↗
53. Soedarmadji E, Stein HS, Suram SK, Guevarra D, Gregoire JM (2019) Tracking materials science data lineage to manage millions of materials experiments and analyses. NPJ Comput Mater 5:79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0216-x10.1038/s41524-019-0216-x ↗
54. Stein HS, Gregoire JM (2019) Progress and prospects for accelerating materials science with automated and autonomous workflows. Chem Sci 10:9640. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SC03766G10.1039/C9SC03766G ↗
55. Blaiszik B, Chard K, Pruyne J, Ananthakrishnan R, Tuecke S, Foster I (2016) The materials data facility: data services to advance materials science research. JOM 68:2045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2001-310.1007/s11837-016-2001-3 ↗
56. Ghiringhelli LM, Baldauf C, Bereau T, Brockhauser S, Carbogno C, Chamanara J, Cozzini S, Curtarolo S, Draxl C, Dwaraknath S (2023) Shared metadata for data-centric materials science. Sci Data 10:626. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02501-810.1038/s41597-023-02501-8 ↗