Identifying Acoustic Emission Depth in Plate-Like Structures

1. Homa L, Lesthaeghe T, Cherry M, Wertz J (2024) Microtexture region segmentation of eddy current testing data using a structural prior. Inverse Prob 40(5):055013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ad366e10.1088/1361-6420/ad366e ↗

2. Brantut N (2018) Time-resolved tomography using acoustic emissions in the laboratory, and application to sandstone compaction. Geophys J Int 213(3):2177–2192. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy06810.1093/gji/ggy068 ↗

3. Tulshibagwale N, Brodnik N, Muir C, Hilmas A, Kiser JD, Smith CE, Almansour AS, Presby MJ, Daly S (2024) Acoustic emission in ceramic matrix composites. Appl Mech Rev 10(1115/1):4064763

4. Eitzen DG, Wadley HNG (1984) Acoustic emission: establishing the fundamentals. J Res Natl Bur Stand 89(1):75–100. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.089.008.10.6028/jres.089.008. ↗

5. Maillet E, Godin N, R’Mili M, Reynaud P, Fantozzi G, Lamon J (2014) Damage monitoring and identification in SiC/SiC minicomposites using combined acousto-ultrasonics and acoustic emission. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 57:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.010.10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.010. ↗

6. Swaminathan B, McCarthy NR, Almansour AS, Sevener K, Musaffar AK, Pollock TM, Kiser JD, Daly S (2021) Interpreting acoustic energy emission in SiC/SiC minicomposites through modeling of fracture surface areas. J Eur Ceram Soc 41(14):6883–6893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.06.030.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.06.030. ↗

7. Dubuc B, Ebrahimkhanlou A, Livadiotis S, Salamone S (2019) Inversion algorithm for Lamb-wave-based depth characterization of acoustic emission sources in plate-like structures. Ultrasonics 99:105975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2019.105975.10.1016/j.ultras.2019.105975. ↗

8. Zhu W, Xu K, Darve E, Beroza GC (2021) A general approach to seismic inversion with automatic differentiation. Comput Geosci 151:104751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104751.10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104751. ↗

9. To AC, Glaser SD (2005) Full waveform inversion of a 3-D source inside an artificial rock. J Sound Vib 285(4):835–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.09.001.10.1016/j.jsv.2004.09.001. ↗

10. Gorman MR (1991) Plate wave acoustic emission. J Acoust Soc Am 90(1):358–364. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.401258.10.1121/1.401258. ↗

11. Hamstad MA, Gary J (2002) A wavelet transform applied to acoustic emission signals: part 2: source location. J Acoust Emiss 20:39–61

12. Baker C, Morscher GN, Pujar VV, Lemanski JR (2015) Transverse cracking in carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: modal acoustic emission and peak frequency analysis. Compos Sci Technol 116:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.05.005.10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.05.005. ↗

13. Hamstad M (2022) A glimpse at fifty-one years in acoustic emission. In: e-Journal of nondestructive testing, vol 28. University of Denver, Ljubljana, Slovenia. https://www.ndt.net/search/docs.php3?id=2759210.58286/27592 ↗

14. Muir C, Swaminathan B, Fields K, Almansour AS, Sevener K, Smith C, Presby M, Kiser JD, Pollock TM, Daly S (2021) A machine learning framework for damage mechanism identification from acoustic emissions in unidirectional SiC/SiC composites. NPJ Comput Mater 7(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00620-710.1038/s41524-021-00620-7 ↗

15. Gorman MR, Prosser WH (1991) AE source orientation by plate wave analysis. J Acoust Emiss 9(4):283–288. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040121066

16. Sause MGR (2011) Investigation of pencil-lead breaks as acoustic emissions sources. J Acoust Emiss 29:13

17. Morscher G, Han Z (2018) Damage determination in ceramic composites subject to tensile fatigue using acoustic emission. Materials 11(12):2477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1112247710.3390/ma11122477 ↗

18. Hamstad MA (2007) Acoustic emission signals generated by monopole (pencillead break) versus dipole sources: finite element modeling and experiments. J Acoust Emiss 25:15

19. Muir C, Tulshibagwale N, Furst A, Swaminathan B, Almansour AS, Sevener K, Presby M, Kiser JD, Pollock TM, Daly S, Smith C (2023) Quantitative benchmarking of acoustic emission machine learning frameworks for damage mechanism identification. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 12:70–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-023-00293-810.1007/s40192-023-00293-8 ↗

20. Maillet E, Godin N, R’Mili M, Reynaud P, Fantozzi G, Lamon J (2014) Real-time evaluation of energy attenuation: a novel approach to acoustic emission analysis for damage monitoring of ceramic matrix composites. J Eur Ceram Soc 34(7):1673–1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.12.041.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.12.041. ↗

21. Theobald PD, Esward TJ, Dowson SP, Preston RC (2005) Acoustic emission transducers-development of a facility for traceable out-of-plane displacement calibration. Ultrasonics 43(5):343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2004.07.007.10.1016/j.ultras.2004.07.007. ↗

22. Maillet E, Morscher GN (2015) Waveform-based selection of acoustic emission events generated by damage in composite materials. Mech Syst Signal Process 52–53:217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.08.001.10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.08.001. ↗

23. Maillet E, Baker C, Morscher GN, Pujar VV, Lemanski JR (2015) Feasibility and limitations of damage identification in composite materials using acoustic emission. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 75:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.003.10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.003. ↗

24. Godin N, Reynaud P, Fantozzi G (2018) Challenges and limitations in the identification of acoustic emission signature of damage mechanisms in composites materials. Appl Sci 8(8):1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/app808126710.3390/app8081267 ↗

25. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay E (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12(85):2825–2830

26. Geron A (2019) Hands-on machine learning with scikit-learn, 2nd edn. Keras & TensorFlow

27. Simonyan K, Vedaldi A, Zisserman A (2014) Deep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps. arXiv:1312.6034 [cs]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.603410.48550/arXiv.1312.6034 ↗

28. Saeedifar M, Najafabadi MA, Zarouchas D, Toudeshky HH, Jalalvand M (2018) Clustering of interlaminar and intralaminar damages in laminated composites under indentation loading using Acoustic Emission. Compos B Eng 144:206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.028.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.028. ↗

29. Shateri M, Ghaib M, Svecova D, Thomson D (2017) On acoustic emission for damage detection and failure prediction in fiber reinforced polymer rods using pattern recognition analysis. Smart Mater Struct 26(6):065023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aa6e43.10.1088/1361-665X/aa6e43 ↗

30. Moevus M, Godin N, R’Mili M, Rouby D, Reynaud P, Fantozzi G, Farizy G (2008) Analysis of damage mechanisms and associated acoustic emission in two SiCf/[Si–B–C] composites exhibiting different tensile behaviours. Part II Unsupervised acoustic emission data clustering. Compos Sci Technol 68(6):1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.12.002.10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.12.002. ↗

31. Raghunath S, Ulloa Cerna AE, Jing L, vanMaanen DP, Stough J, Hartzel DN, Leader JB, Kirchner HL, Stumpe MC, Hafez A, Nemani A, Carbonati T, Johnson KW, Young K, Good CW, Pfeifer JM, Patel AA, Delisle BP, Alsaid A, Beer D, Haggerty CM, Fornwalt BK (2020) Prediction of mortality from 12-lead electrocardiogram voltage data using a deep neural network. Nat Med 26(6):886–891. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0870-z10.1038/s41591-020-0870-z ↗