Framework for the Generation of 3D Fiber Composite Structures from 2D Observations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Synthetic generation of realistic materials for testing of process–structure–property (PSP) relationships in computational materials science has gained significant traction over the past two decades. Generation tools continue to lag in some aspects of realism, leading to uncertainty and errors in simulating material response. The experimental collection of information to guide generation of 3D synthetic structures remains costly, time consuming, and challenging. These challenges are compounded by limitations of stereology, which permits estimation of 3D microstructural statistics from 2D observations under restrictive assumptions on constituent morphologies and size distributions and can be difficult to apply to microstructure metrics like constituent orientation distribution and clustering. This work seeks to overcome these challenges by introducing a framework for learning probable 3D microstructure statistics by minimizing the loss determined by matching statistics obtained from 2D observations via synthetic microstructure generation software (e.g. Dream.3D) and stereological principles. This framework is applied to short carbon fiber composite structures printed from an additive manufacturing process, Direct Ink Writing, with the hope that the framework could generalize to other particulate structures as well as allow for simulation and design of materials structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Wright WJ, Koerner H, Rapking D, Abbott A, Celik E (2022) Rapid fiber alignment quantification in direct write printing of short fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B Eng 236:109814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10981410.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109814 ↗
2. Nawafleh N, Erbay F, Aljaghtham M, Oflaz E, Ciciriello A, Dumont C, Dauer E, Gorguluarslan R, Demir T, Celik E (2020) Static and dynamic mechanical performance of short Kevlar fiber reinforced composites fabricated via direct ink writing. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04826-w10.1007/s10853-020-04826-w ↗
3. Lewicki J, Rodriguez J et al (2017) 3d-printing of meso-structurally ordered carbon fiber/polymer composites with unprecedented orthotropic physical properties. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep4340110.1038/srep43401 ↗
4. Jiao Y, Chawla N (2014) Modeling and characterizing anisotropic inclusion orientation in heterogeneous material via directional cluster functions and stochastic microstructure reconstruction. J Appl Phys 115(9):093511. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.486761110.1063/1.4867611 ↗
5. Rollett AD, Campman R, Saylor D (2006) Three dimensional microstructures: statistical analysis of second phase particles in aa7075-t651. In: Aluminium alloys 2006 - ICAA10. Materials science forum, vol 519, pp 1–10. Trans Tech Publications Ltd (2006). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.1 ↗
6. Groeber M, Ghosh S, Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM (2008) A framework for automated analysis and simulation of 3d polycrystalline microstructures: part 1: statistical characterization. Acta Mater 56(6):1257–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.04110.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.041 ↗
7. Sheidaei A, Baniassadi M, Banu M, Askeland P, Pahlavanpour M, Kuuttila N, Pourboghrat F, Drzal LT, Garmestani H (2013) 3-d microstructure reconstruction of polymer nano-composite using FIB-SEM and statistical correlation function. Compos Sci Technol 80:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.001 ↗
8. Fullwood DT, Niezgoda SR, Kalidindi SR (2008) Microstructure reconstructions from 2-point statistics using phase-recovery algorithms. Acta Mater 56(5):942–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.04410.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.044 ↗
9. Deng H, Liu Y, Gai D, Dikin DA, Putz KW, Chen W, Catherine Brinson L, Burkhart C, Poldneff M, Jiang B, Papakonstantopoulos GJ (2012) Utilizing real and statistically reconstructed microstructures for the viscoelastic modeling of polymer nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 72(14):1725–1732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.020 ↗
10. Gommes CJ, Jiao Y, Torquato S (2012) Microstructural degeneracy associated with a two-point correlation function and its information content. Phys Rev E 85:051140. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.05114010.1103/PhysRevE.85.051140 ↗
11. Chawla N, Chawla KK (2006) Microstructure-based modeling of the deformation behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci 41:913–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-6572-110.1007/s10853-006-6572-1 ↗
12. Zhao Z, Wu H, Zhang M, Fu S, Zhu K (2023) Fiber orientation reconstruction from sem images of fiber-reinforced composites. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1306370010.3390/app13063700 ↗
13. Notta-Cuvier D, Lauro F, Bennani B (2014) An original approach for mechanical modelling of short-fibre reinforced composites with complex distributions of fibre orientation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 62:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.016 ↗
14. Sharp ND, Goodsell JE, Favaloro AJ (2019) Measuring fiber orientation of elliptical fibers from optical microscopy. J Compos Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs301002310.3390/jcs3010023 ↗
15. Behrens B-A, Rolfes R, Vucetic M, Reinoso J, Vogler M, Grbic N (2014) Material modelling of short fiber reinforced thermoplastic for the fea of a clinching test. In: Proceedings of the international conference on manufacturing of lightweight components—ManuLight 2014. Procedia CIRP, vol 18, pp 250–255 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.14010.1016/j.procir.2014.06.140 ↗
16. Yang H, Colton JS (1994) Quantitative image processing analysis of composite materials. Polym Compos 15(1):46–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.75015010810.1002/pc.750150108 ↗
17. Spowart JE, Maruyama B, Miracle DB (2001) Multi-scale characterization of spatially heterogeneous systems: implications for discontinuously reinforced metal-matrix composite microstructures. Mater Sci Eng A 307(1):51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01962-610.1016/S0921-5093(00)01962-6 ↗
18. Madej L (2017) Digital/virtual microstructures in application to metals engineering—a review. Arch Civil Mech Eng 17(4):839–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.03.00210.1016/j.acme.2017.03.002 ↗
19. Callahan PG, Groeber M, De Graef M (2016) Towards a quantitative comparison between experimental and synthetic grain structures. Acta Mater 111:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.07810.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.078 ↗
20. Groeber MA, Haley BK, Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM, Ghosh S (2006) 3D reconstruction and characterization of polycrystalline microstructures using a FIB-SEM system. Mater Charact 57(4):259–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2006.01.01910.1016/j.matchar.2006.01.019 ↗
21. Kumar NC, Matouš K, Geubelle PH (2008) Reconstruction of periodic unit cells of multimodal random particulate composites using genetic algorithms. Comput Mater Sci 42(2):352–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.04310.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.043 ↗
22. Cruz-Orive LM (2017) Stereology: a historical survey. Image Anal Stereol 36(3):153–177. https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.176710.5566/ias.1767 ↗
23. Liu G (1993) Applied stereology in materials science and engineering. J Microsc 171(1):57–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03358.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03358.x ↗
24. Ferguson CC (1979) Intersections of ellipsoids and planes of arbitrary orientation and position. Math Geol 11:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0103499710.1007/BF01034997 ↗
25. Da Costa J-P, Oprean S, Baylou P, Germain C (2013) Stereological estimation of orientation distribution of generalized cylinders from a unique 2D slice. Microsc Microanal 19(6):1678–1687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S143192761301354810.1017/S1431927613013548 ↗
26. Mohana Kumar L, Zeng C, Foster SJ (2022) A stereological approach to estimation of fibre distribution in concrete. Construct Build Mater 324:126547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12654710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126547 ↗
27. Dowd C (2020) A new ECDF two-sample test statistic (2020) arXiv:2007.01360 [stat.ME]
28. Rowenhorst D, Rollett AD, Rohrer GS, Groeber M, Jackson M, Konijnenberg PJ, Graef MD (2015) Consistent representations of and conversions between 3d rotations. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 23(8):083501. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/23/8/08350110.1088/0965-0393/23/8/083501 ↗
29. Groeber MA, Jackson MA (2014) Dream.3D: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3d. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3:55–72. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9772-3-510.1186/2193-9772-3-5 ↗
30. Gerlt ARC, Criner AK, Lee-Semiatin S, Wertz KN (2021) Non-linear transfer functions for accurately estimating 3d particle size, distribution, and expected error from 2d cross sections of a lognormal distribution of spherical particles. Metall Mater Trans A 52:228–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-06072-w10.1007/s11661-020-06072-w ↗