A Simultaneous Analysis of the User Safety and Resilience of a Twin-Tube Road Tunnel
Source abstract
Abstract
This study complements our previous work with a simultaneous analysis of user safety and road tunnel resilience. We developed a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model and simulated the corresponding egress process to evaluate the risk level of users exposed to different types of fire, such those which might occur on the undisrupted lane of a partially closed tube tunnel due to a traffic accident, or in the adjacent tube when used for two-way traffic in the case of the complete closure of the tube involved in the accident. The CFD results showed that: (i) better environmental conditions were found with the partial closure of the tube rather than the complete one; (ii) additional benefits can be achieved by activating variable message signs (VMSs) that suggest an alternative itinerary for heavy good vehicles (HGVs) only; (iii) safety issues for human health may arise only in the case of a 100 MW fire, occurring during the complete closure of the tube and the use of the parallel one for two-way traffic. The findings of the CFD simulations were subsequently used to perform a quantitative risk analysis (QRA) based on a probabilistic approach. The findings of the QRA were found to be consistent with those obtained by the tunnel resilience analysis. In particular, the lowest risk level for user safety was found with the partial closure of the tube instead of the complete one, and by activating the VMSs to redirect HGVs only towards an alternative itinerary. This finding was found to correspond to a higher resilience index of the tunnel (i.e., a lower resilience loss due to a traffic accident occurring in a tube). This study increases our knowledge on certain relevant aspects of the operating conditions of tunnels and can serve as a possible reference for tunnel management agencies (TMAs) in their choice of the most appropriate arrangement to recover the functionality of a tunnel taking into account both user safety and resilience at the same time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Underground infrastructure and sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. A crash-prediction model for multilane roads10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.012 ↗
2. A crash-prediction model for road tunnels10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.024 ↗
3. A new bivariate regression model for the simultaneous analysis of total and severe crashes occurrence
4. Comparison and analysis of road tunnel traffic accident frequencies and rates using random-parameter model
5. Analysis of crash frequency in motorway tunnels based on a correlated random-parameters approach10.1016/j.tust.2018.12.012 ↗
6. A Bayesian bivariate hierarchical model with correlated parameters for the analysis of road crashes in Italian tunnels10.1007/s10260-021-00567-5 ↗
7. Evaluation of Resiliency of Transportation Networks after Disasters10.3141/2284-13 ↗
8. Measuring the Performance of Transportation Infrastructure Systems in Disasters: A Comprehensive Review10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000212 ↗
9. A new measure of resilience: An application to the London Underground10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.017 ↗
10. Resilience metrics and measurement methods for transportation infrastructure: The state of the art10.1080/23789689.2018.1448663 ↗
11. The influence of spillback modelling when assessing consequences of Blockings in a road network
12. Simulation studies of traffic management strategies for a long tunnel10.1016/j.tust.2011.08.004 ↗
13. Measuring the resiliency of the Manhattan points of entry in the face of severe disruption10.3844/ajeassp.2011.153.161 ↗
14. Evaluation of diversion strategies using dynamic traffic assignment10.1080/03081060.2011.565168 ↗
15. Transport resilience and vulnerability: The role of connectivity10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.012 ↗
16. Improving regional road network resilience by optimised traffic guidance
17. Amini, S., Tilg, G., and Busch, F. (2018, January 4–7). Evaluating the impact of real-time traffic control measures on the resilience of urban road networks. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569678 ↗
18. Transportation network redundancy: Complementary measures and computational methods10.1016/j.trb.2018.05.014 ↗
19. Assessing the effects of link-repair sequences on road network resilience10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100448 ↗
20. Traffic signal optimisation in disrupted networks, to improve resilience and sustainability10.1016/j.tbs.2020.08.005 ↗
21. Stochastic event simulation model for quantitative prediction of road tunnel downtime10.1016/j.tust.2021.104092 ↗
22. Research on resilience recovery strategy optimization of highway after disaster based on genetic algorithm10.1088/1742-6596/2083/3/032014 ↗
23. PIARC (2021). PIARC Literature Review—Improving Road Tunnel Resilience, Considering Safety and Availability, Technical Committee on Road Tunnels, The World Road Association. Available online: https://www.piarc.org/en/order-library/35017-en-ImprovingRoad%20Tunnel%20Resilience,%20Considering%20Safety%20and%20Availability%20-%20PIARC%20Literature%20Review.
24. Resilience and Emergency Management of Road Tunnels: The Case Study of the San Rocco and Stonio Tunnels in Italy
25. Caliendo, C., Russo, I., and Genovese, G. (2022). Resilience Assessment of a Twin-Tube Motorway Tunnel in the Event of a Traffic Accident or Fire in a Tube. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12010513 ↗
26. Numerical simulation of different HGV fire scenarios in curved bi-directional road tunnels and safety evaluation10.1016/j.tust.2012.04.004 ↗
27. Simulation of fire scenarios due to different vehicle types with and without traffic in a bi-directional road tunnel10.1016/j.tust.2013.03.004 ↗
28. Computational analysis of fire and people evacuation for different positions of burning vehicles in a road tunnel with emergency exits10.1080/23311916.2018.1530834 ↗
29. Modeling and numerical simulation of pedestrian flow evacuation from a multi-storey historical building in the event of fire applying safety engineering tools10.1016/j.culher.2019.06.010 ↗
30. Caliendo, C., Genovese, G., and Russo, I. (2021). Risk analysis of road tunnels: A computational fluid dynamic model for assessing the effects of natural ventilation. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010032 ↗
31. Caliendo, C., Russo, I., and Genovese, G. (2021). Risk analysis of one-way road tunnel tube used for bi-directional traffic under fire scenarios. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11073198 ↗
32. Caliendo, C., Genovese, G., and Russo, I. (2021). A Numerical Study for Assessing the Risk Reduction Using an Emergency Vehicle Equipped with a Micronized Water System for Contrasting the Fire Growth Phase in Road Tunnels. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11115248 ↗
33. Quantitative risk analysis on the transport of dangerous goods through a bi-directional road tunnel10.1111/risa.12594 ↗
34. Quantitative risk analysis based on the impact of traffic flow in a road tunnel
35. Simplified method for risk evaluation in unidirectional road tunnels related to dangerous goods vehicles
36. Caliendo, C., and De Guglielmo, M.L. (2019). Risk level evaluation of dangerous goods through road tunnels. Pavement and Asset Management, Proceedings of the World Conference on Pavement and Asset Management, Baveno, Italy, 12–16 June 2017, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429264702-93 ↗
37. Quantitative Risk Assessment on the Transport of Dangerous Goods Vehicles Through Unidirectional Road Tunnels: An Evaluation of the Risk of Transporting Hydrogen10.1111/risa.13653 ↗
38. National Research Council (2010). HCM 2010: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board.
39. Concrete at high temperature with application to tunnel fire10.1007/s00466-002-0318-y ↗
40. Microsimulation Approach for Predicting Crashes at Unsignalized Intersections Using Traffic Conflicts10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000473 ↗
41. Road Transition Zones between the Rural and Urban Environment: Evaluation of Speed and Traffic Performance Using a Microsimulation Approach10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000495 ↗
42. A Stress-prediction model for airport pavements with jointed concrete slabs10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000151 ↗
43. Delay time model at unsignalized intersections10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000696 ↗
44. Astarita, V., Caliendo, C., Giofrè, V.P., and Russo, I. (2020). Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation: Validation of safety indicators with intersection traffic crash data. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12176974 ↗
45. McGrattan, K., Hostikka, S., Floyd, J., McDermott, R., and Vanella, M. (2019). Fire Dynamics Simulator: User’s Guide, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Fire Research Division, Engineering Laboratory. [6th ed.].
46. Comparison of different combustion models in enclosure fire simulation10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00043-6 ↗
47. Korhonen, T. (2018). Fire Dynamic Simulator with Evacuation: FDS+Evac Technical Reference and User’s Guide, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
48. DiNenno, P.J., Drysdale, D., Beyler, C.L., Douglas Walton, W., Custer, R.L.P., Hall, J.R., and Watts, J.M. (1995). SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, National Fire Protection Association. [3rd ed.].
49. Experimental study on vertical evacuation capacity of evacuation slide in road shield tunnel10.1016/j.tust.2019.103250 ↗
50. UPTUN (2022, February 02). Workpackage 2—Fire Development and Mitigation Measures. Available online: https://fogtec-international.com/files/uptun-guideline-08_30.08.07.pdf.
51. CFPA Europe (2021, February 02). Fire Safety Engineering Concerning Evacuation from Buildings. Guidelines No 19: 2009. CFPA Eur. Available online: http://www.cfpa-e.eu/wp-content/uploads/files/guidelines/CFPA_E_Guideline_No_19_2009.pdf.
52. ANAS (2022, February 02). Linee Guida per la Progettazione della Sicurezza nelle Gallerie Stradali Secondo la Normativa Vigente. Circolare n°179431/2009. Available online: https://www.stradeanas.it/sites/default/files/pdf/Linee_guida_sicurezza_gallerie_2009.pdf.