Echo State Network Based Model Predictive Control for Active Vibration Control of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Powertrains
Source abstract
Abstract
Reservoir computing refers to a computational framework based on recurrent neural networks that can process time-series data. In an echo state network (ESN), which is a type of reservoir computing framework, the reservoir consists of a recursive network of artificial neurons with nonlinear activation functions. A model predictive control (MPC) technique can determine the control signals by solving the optimization problem of a system using the finite-time domain of each control period. However, real-time optimization cannot be achieved unless the optimal control problem can be solved within the next control period. To overcome this limitation, we propose a new control method based on MPC that explicitly incorporates the predicted disturbance of a time-varying trajectory using ESN to achieve the active vibration control of hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) powertrains. Once the ESN has been trained, the associated MPC explicitly satisfies the constraints over a moving horizon without further training. Instead of completing the real-time optimization within the control period, ESN predicts the future disturbance and applies it to the MPC in the future control period. Based on the predicted future disturbance, the system calculates the optimal control signals required for the future. Thus, real-time control can be realized because the optimal signals are determined before the subsequent control period occurs. The proposed method can be implemented in MPC even if the control period is too short to optimize as long as the disturbance can be reasonably measured and predicted. In this study, the simulation approach was demonstrated using the engine start condition in an HEV powertrain. The importance of this study is that the limitation of MPC relevant to real-time optimization can be relaxed by applying our proposed method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aisin AW Industries Co., Ltd., 38 Ikenokami, Echizen, Fukui 915-8520, Japan
Department of Human and Artificial Intelligent Systems, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Fukui, 3-9-1 Bunkyo, Fukui-shi, Fukui 910-8507, Japan
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Ohtsuka, T. (2017, January 2–3). Concept and Applications of Real-Time Optimization. Proceedings of the Conference of Transdisciplinary Federation of Science and Technology, Kyoto, Japan. (In Japanese).
2. Kooy, A., and Seebacher, R. (2018, January 11–13). Best-in-Class Dampers for Every Driveline Concept. Proceedings of the Schaeffler Kolloqu, Baden-Baden, Germany.
3. Active flywheel control based on the method of moment restrictions10.1109/ACC.1997.612101 ↗
4. Beuschel, M., Rau, M., and Schroder, D. (2000, January 8–12). Adaptive damping of torque pulsation using a starter generator-opportunities and boundaries. Proceedings of the Conference Record of the 2000 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, Rome, Italy.
5. On the explicit dead-time compensation for robust model predictive control10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.08.003 ↗
6. Anti-Jerk Control of a Parallel Hybrid Electrified Vehicle with Dead Time10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.172 ↗
7. MPC for Active Torsional Vibration Reduction of Hybrid Electric Powertrains10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.08.110 ↗
8. Model predictive control using neural networks10.1109/37.466261 ↗
9. Lanzetti, N., Lian, Y.Z., Cortinovis, A., Dominguez, L., Mercangöz, M., and Jones, C. (2019, January 25–28). Recurrent Neural Network based MPC for Process Industries. Proceedings of the 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC), Naples, Italy.10.23919/ECC.2019.8795809 ↗
10. Recurrent Neural Network-Based Model Predictive Control for Multiple Unmanned Quadrotor Formation Flight10.1155/2019/7272387 ↗
11. Model Predictive Control of Unknown Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Based on Recurrent Neural Networks10.1109/TIE.2011.2169636 ↗
12. Regularized Taylor Echo State Networks for Predictive Control of Partially Observed Systems
13. Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of an Oil Well with Echo State Networks10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.348 ↗
14. A Practical Approach to Predictive Control for Nonlinear Processes10.3182/20070822-3-ZA-2920.00035 ↗
15. Zhang, H., Liu, C., Su, H., and Zhang, K. (2020). Echo State Network-Based Decentralized Control of Continuous-Time Nonlinear Large-Scale Interconnected Systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 1–11.
16. Liu, C., Zhang, H., Luo, Y., and Su, H. (2020). Dual Heuristic Programming for Optimal Control of Continuous-Time Nonlinear Systems Using Single Echo State Network. IEEE Trans. Cybern., 1–12.
17. Shen, T., and Ohata, A. (2011). Modeling and Control Design for Automotive Engines, Corona Publishing. (In Japanese).
18. Welch, G., and Bishop, G. (2001). An Introduction to the Kalman Filter, University of North Carolina. Technical Report.
19. Maciejowski, J. (2002). Predictive Control With Constraints, Pearson Education Limited.
20. Real-time optimization and nonlinear model predictive control of processes governed by differential-algebraic equations10.1016/S0959-1524(01)00023-3 ↗
21. The ”echo state” approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks
22. Harnessing Nonlinearity: Predicting Chaotic Systems and Saving Energy in Wireless Communication10.1126/science.1091277 ↗
23. Rasmussen, C.E., and Williams, C.K.I. (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
24. Wiseman, Y. (2020). “Autonomous Vehicles”, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Information Resources Management Association. [5th ed.].10.4018/978-1-7998-3479-3.ch001 ↗