Machine Learning Statistical Ultrasonic Non-destructive Prediction for Friction Stir Processed Metal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Brake Systems and Friction Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang B, Zhong S, Lee T-L, Fancey KS, Mi J (2020) Non-destructive testing and evaluation of composite materials/structures: a state-of-the-art review. Adv Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1177/168781402091376110.1177/1687814020913761 ↗
2. Donald T, New K, Pole M, Guo Y, Guzman A, Ortiz A, Olszta M, Linsuain O, Brown D, Escobar JD, Garcia D, Wang T, Das H, Barker E (2025) MCPC characterization round 1. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.25584/mcpc/257261710.25584/mcpc/2572617 ↗
3. Barker EI, Todd DR, Nwe K, Pole M, Guo Y, Guzman AD, Ortiz A, Olszta MJ, Linsuain O, Brown DML, Escobar JD, Garcia D, Wang T, Das H, Ross KA, Smith LE (2025) MCPC characterization round 2. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.25584/mcpc/257281010.25584/mcpc/2572810 ↗
4. Barker EI, Todd DR, Nwe K, Pole M, Guo Y, Guzman AD, Ortiz A, Olszta MJ, Linsuain O, Brown DML, Escobar JD, Garcia D, Wang T, Das H, Ross KA, Smith LE (2025) MCPC characterization round 3. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.25584/mcpc/257281510.25584/mcpc/2572815 ↗
5. Mishra RS, Ma ZY (2005) Friction stir welding and processing. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 50:1–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2005.07.00110.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001 ↗
6. Liu FC, Hovanski Y, Miles MP, Sorensen CD, Nelson TW (2018) A review of friction stir welding of steels: tool, material flow, microstructure, and properties. J Mater Sci Technol 34:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2017.10.02410.1016/j.jmst.2017.10.024 ↗
7. Mishra D, Roy RB, Dutta S, Pal SK, Chakravarty D (2018) A review on sensor based monitoring and control of friction stir welding process and a roadmap to Industry. J Manuf Process 36:373–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.01610.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.016 ↗
8. Saxena P, Bongale A, Kumar S (2022) A review of friction stir processing in fabricating surface composites for process control and sensor data monitoring. Mater Today Proc 50:2099–2104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.42710.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.427 ↗
9. Tabatabaeipour M, Hettler J, Delrue S, Van Den Abeele K (2016) Non-destructive ultrasonic examination of root defects in friction stir welded butt-joints. NDT E Int 80:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.02.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2016.02.007 ↗
10. Fakih MA, Mustapha S, Tarraf J, Ayoub G, Hamade R (2018) Detection and assessment of flaws in friction stir welded joints using ultrasonic guided waves: experimental and finite element analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 101:516–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.00310.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.003 ↗
11. Xiao H, Chen D, Xu J, Guo S (2020) Defects identification using the improved ultrasonic measurement model and support vector machines. NDT E Int 111:102223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10222310.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102223 ↗
12. Martín Ó, Pereda M, Santos JI, Galán JM (2014) Assessment of resistance spot welding quality based on ultrasonic testing and tree-based techniques. J Mater Process Technol 214:2478–2487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.05.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.05.021 ↗
13. Pawar P, Buktar R (2022) Detection and classification of defects in ultrasonic testing using deep learning. In: Gunjan VK, Zurada JM (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on recent trends in machine learning, IoT, smart cities and applications. Springer Nature, Singapore, pp 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6407-6_110.1007/978-981-16-6407-6_1 ↗
14. Sun H, Ramuhalli P, Jacob RE (2023) Machine learning for ultrasonic nondestructive examination of welding defects: a systematic review. Ultrasonics 127:106854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10685410.1016/j.ultras.2022.106854 ↗
15. Hartl R, Bachmann A, Habedank JB, Semm T, Zaeh MF (2021) Process monitoring in friction stir welding using convolutional neural networks. Metals 11:535. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1104053510.3390/met11040535 ↗
16. Kuhn M, Johnson K (2020) A review of the predictive modeling process. In: Feature engineering and selection: a practical approach for predictive models. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781315108230 ↗
17. Zhang H, Zimmerman J, Nettleton D, Nordman DJ (2020) Random forest prediction intervals. Am Stat 74:392–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.158528810.1080/00031305.2019.1585288 ↗
18. Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 310:17010.1136/bmj.310.6973.170 ↗
19. Gregorutti B, Michel B, Saint-Pierre P (2017) Correlation and variable importance in random forests. Stat Comput 27:659–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9646-110.1007/s11222-016-9646-1 ↗
20. Kuhn M, Wickham H (2020) Tidymodels: a collection of packages for modeling and machine learning using tidyverse principles. https://www.tidymodels.org
21. Wickham H (2019) Welcome to the {tidyverse}. J Open Source Softw 4:1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.0168610.21105/joss.01686 ↗
22. VanderWeele TJ, Mathur MB (2019) Some desirable properties of the Bonferroni correction: is the Bonferroni correction really so bad? Am J Epidemiol 188:617–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy25010.1093/aje/kwy250 ↗
23. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70
24. Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051180284310.1017/CBO9780511802843 ↗
25. Stoklosa J, Hwang W-H, Warton DI (2023) A general algorithm for error-in-variables regression modelling using Monte Carlo expectation maximization. PLoS ONE 18:e0283798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028379810.1371/journal.pone.0283798 ↗
26. Bersimis S, Psarakis S, Panaretos J (2007) Multivariate statistical process control charts: an overview. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23:517–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.82910.1002/qre.829 ↗
27. Qiu P (2024) Machine learning approaches for statistical process control. In: Wiley StatsRef: statistics reference online. Wiley, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat08469. Accessed 12 June 202410.1002/9781118445112.stat08469 ↗
28. Tran PH, Ahmadi Nadi A, Nguyen TH, Tran KD, Tran KP (2022) Application of machine learning in statistical process control charts: a survey and perspective. In: Tran KP (ed) Control charts and machine learning for anomaly detection in manufacturing. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83819-5_2.10.1007/978-3-030-83819-5_2 ↗