journal article·2021-06-07Open access

Evaluation of ACL Graft Remodeling and Prediction of Graft Insufficiency in Sequenced MRI—Two-Year Follow-Up

Urszula Zdanowicz, Beata Ciszkowska-Łysoń, Marcin Paśnik, Michał Drwięga, Karol Ratajczak, Kamil Fulawka, Yoojin C. Lee, Robert Śmigielski

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

Background: Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft maturity is a useful and practical tool that allows for assessment of graft status and remodeling stage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare previously described methods of graft evaluation in MRI. We identify factors influencing the maturation and correlating graft appearance in MRI with indirect symptoms of graft insufficiency to identify patients at risk. Methods: Retrospective evaluation was performed in 44 patients who received bone patellar tendon bone (BPTB) ACL reconstruction with nine consecutive postoperative MRIs at 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 weeks. Graft status was evaluated using signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) methods in both sagittal and axial planes. We also assessed the homogeneity of the graft by standard deviation (SD) of signal intensity. SNQ was correlated with patient’s age, sex, postoperative weight-bearing, as well as indirect signs of graft insufficiency by MRI including graft appearance, posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) buckling, and measurement of anterior tibia subluxation. Results: We observed that the results of modelling SNQs from both sagittal and axial planes were similar. For both SNQs, the change over weeks quotient was nonlinear where the clinical parameter increased at week 36 and subsequently decreased. The SNQ at week 96 does not reach the levels from week 2. We observed that the model incorporating SNQ and relative SD (rSD) in the sagittal plane predicted the tibia anterior subluxation proportions better than the model with clinical parameters measured in the axial plane. Our results demonstrate that greater SD is associated with less graft homogeneity, which could indicate that this model is a good predictor of graft insufficiency. In addition, the proportion of PCL buckling increased over the course of the study. Conclusions: MRI graft evaluation is very useful for assessing graft ligamentization stage and to predict graft insufficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Carolina Medical Center, Orthopaedic and Sports Traumatology Department, Pory 78, 02-757 Warsaw, Poland

McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 450 Technology Drive, Suite 300, Pittsburgh, PA 15219-3110, USA

Carolina Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Pory 78, 02-757 Warsaw, Poland

Radiology and Imaging Diagnostic Department, LIFE Institute, Grzybowska 43a/U8, 00-855 Warsaw, Poland

MIRAI Clinic, Radiology Department, Armii Krajowej 8, 05-400 Otwock, Poland

MIRAI Clinic, Orthopaedic Department, Armii Krajowej 8, 05-400 Otwock, Poland

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, UCK Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland

Pogotowie Statystyczne, Stefana Hausbrandta 34/88, 80-126 Gdańsk, Poland

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219-3110, USA

Biological Treatment Centre, Orthopaedics Department, LIFE Institute, 02-757 Warsaw, Poland

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. The Long-Term Consequence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscus Injuries: Osteoarthritis10.1177/0363546507307396 ↗
2. Tibiofemoral Kinematics Following Successful Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Dynamic Multiple Resonance Imaging10.1177/0363546503261702 ↗
3. Allograft Tendons Are a Safe and Effective Option for Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Clinical Review10.1007/s00167-018-5147-4 ↗
4. Ligamentization of Autogenous Hamstring Grafts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Versus Long-Term Results10.1177/0363546515584039 ↗
5. The “Ligamentization” Process in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: What Happens to the Human Graft? A Systematic Review of the Literature10.1177/0363546511402662 ↗
6. In Situ, Noninvasive, T2*-Weighted MRI-Derived Parameters Predict Ex Vivo Structural Properties of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction or Bioenhanced Primary Repair in a Porcine Model10.1177/0363546512472978 ↗
7. MRI Volume and Signal Intensity of ACL Graft Predict Clinical, Functional, and Patient-Oriented Outcome Measures After ACL Reconstruction10.1177/0363546514561435 ↗
8. Biomechanical Properties and Vascularity of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Can Be Predicted by Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Two-Year Study in Sheep10.1177/03635465010290061401 ↗
9. Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autografts during the First Year of Implantation: A Preliminary Study10.1177/036354659101900107 ↗
10. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Hamstring Tendon Autografts: Comparison of Remnant Bundle Preservation and Standard Technique10.1177/0363546510368132 ↗
11. Reconstructed Anterior Cruciate Ligaments Using Patellar Tendon Ligament Grafts: Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced MRI in a 2-Year Follow-up Regimen10.1007/s003300100870 ↗
12. Compensation for Herbivory in Wild Sunflower: Response to Simulated Damage by the Head-Clipping Weevil10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[3097:CFHIWS]2.0.CO;2 ↗
13. Kruschke, J.K. (2015). Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-405888-0.00008-8 ↗
14. R-Squared for Bayesian Regression Models10.1080/00031305.2018.1549100 ↗
15. Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). Brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using. Stan. J. Stat. Soft., 80.10.18637/jss.v080.i01 ↗
16. Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Maturity With Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Literature Review10.1177/2325967119849012 ↗
17. Assessment of Graft Maturity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autografts: A Systematic Review of Biopsy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.008 ↗
18. Inferior Graft Maturity in the PL Bundle after Autograft Hamstring Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction10.1007/s00167-018-5087-z ↗
19. Electron Microscopy of the Remodelling Process in Hamstring Tendon Used as ACL Graft10.1007/s00167-009-0925-7 ↗
20. The Effect of Mechanical Loading Upon Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffold-Mediated Skeletal Muscle Remodeling10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0011 ↗
21. Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
22. Zaffagnini, S. (2015). Return to Sport after ACL Reconstruction: How, When and Why? A Narrative Review of Current Evidence. Joints.10.11138/jts/2015.3.1.025 ↗
23. SIGASCOT Sports Committee, Grassi, A., Vascellari, A., Combi, A., Tomaello, L., Canata, G.L., and Zaffagnini, S. (2016). Return to Sport after ACL Reconstruction: A Survey between the Italian Society of Knee, Arthroscopy, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technologies (SIGASCOT) Members. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol., 26, 509–516.10.1007/s00590-016-1756-0 ↗
24. Should Return to Sport Be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations10.1007/s40279-016-0584-z ↗
25. Accelerated Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Early Knee Osteoarthritis Features at 1 Year: An Exploratory Study10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.09.005 ↗