Show source-provided references
4. Cheng, Y., Leow, W.K., and Lim, T.C. (2012, January 9–11). Automatic identification of frankfurt plane and mid-sagittal plane of skull. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Workshop on the Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Breckenridge, CO, USA.
5. Theoretical basis for virtual skull orientation according to three-dimensional frankfort horizontal plane for computer-aided surgical simulation
10.1097/SCS.0000000000005595 ↗6. Swennen, G.R., Schutyser, F.A., and Hausamen, J.-E. (2005). Three-Dimensional Cephalometry: A Color Atlas and Manual, Springer Science & Business Media.
10.1007/3-540-29011-7 ↗7. Maxillary yaw as the primary predictor of maxillary dental midline deviation: 3d analysis using cone-beam computed tomography
10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.043 ↗9. Lin, H.H., Chuang, Y.F., Weng, J.L., and Lo, L.J. (2015). Comparative validity and reproducibility study of various landmark-oriented reference planes in 3-dimensional computed tomographic analysis for patients receiving orthognathic surgery. PLoS ONE, 10.
10.1371/journal.pone.0117604 ↗10. Accuracy of anatomical landmark identification using different cbct- and msct-based 3d images: An in vitro study
10.1007/s00056-011-0032-5 ↗12. Frankfort horizontal plane is an appropriate three-dimensinal reference in the evaluation of clinical and skeletal cant
10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.2.71 ↗13. Landmarks of the frankfort horizontal plane: Reliability in a three-dimensional cartesian coordinate system
10.1007/s00056-016-0045-1 ↗14. Selection of a horizontal reference plane in 3d evaluation: Identifying facial asymmetry and occlusal cant in orthognathic surgery planning
10.1038/s41598-017-02250-w ↗18. A frontal asymmetry analysis
20. Three-dimensional frankfort horizontal plane for 3d cephalometry: A comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes
10.1093/ejo/cjx066 ↗21. Kapila, S.D. (2014). Protocols for the use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic practice. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: Indications, Insights, and Innovations, John Wiley & Sons.
10.1002/9781118674888 ↗22. Center, O.B.M. (2020, September 29). Ncrp: Achievements of the Past 50 Years and Addressing the Needs of the Future. Available online: https://ncrponline.org/wp-content/themes/ncrp/PDFs/PROGRAM_2-10.pdf.
23. Deviation of landmarks in accordance with methods of establishing reference planes in three-dimensional facial ct evaluation
10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.207 ↗25. Method for quantifying facial asymmetry in three dimensions using stereophotogrammetry
26. Comparison of different midsagittal plane configurations for evaluating craniofacial asymmetry by expert preference
10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.04.024 ↗29. Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients
10.2319/111517-785.1 ↗