Predictive Analysis for Optimizing Port Operations
Source abstract
Abstract
Maritime transport is a pivotal logistics mode for the long-distance and bulk transportation of goods. However, the intricate planning involved in this mode is often hindered by uncertainties, including weather conditions, cargo diversity, and port dynamics, leading to increased costs. Consequently, accurate estimation of the total (stay) time of the vessel and any delays at the port are essential for efficient planning and scheduling of port operations. This study aims to develop predictive analytics to address the shortcomings in the previous works of port operations for a vessel’s Stay Time and Delay Time, offering a valuable contribution to the field of maritime logistics. The proposed solution is designed to assist decision-making in port environments and predict service delays. This is demonstrated through a case study on Brazil’s ports, where the best performance is observed for tree-based methods. Additionally, feature analysis is used to understand and interpret key factors impacting maritime logistics, enhancing the overall understanding of the complexities involved in port operations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Maritime Ports and Logistics · Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Maritime Navigation and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Industrial AI Lab, R&D, Hitachi America, Ltd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Ogura, T., Inoue, T., and Uchihira, N. (2021). Prediction of Arrival Time of Vessels Considering Future Weather Conditions. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11104410 ↗
2. Robust berth scheduling using machine learning for vessel arrival time prediction10.1007/s10696-022-09462-x ↗
3. Machine Learning Models for Efficient Port Terminal Operations: Case of Vessels’ Arrival Times Prediction10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.217 ↗
4. A data-driven optimization of large-scale dry port location using the hybrid approach of data mining and complex network theory10.1016/j.tre.2019.11.010 ↗
5. A decision tree model for the prediction of the stay time of ships in Brazilian ports10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105634 ↗
6. Dimitrios, D., Nikitakos, N., Papachristos, D., and Dalaklis, A. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges in Relation to Big Data Analytics for the Shipping and Port Industries, Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Reggiannini, M., Righi, M., Tampucci, M., Duca, A.L., Bacciu, C., Bedini, L., D’Errico, A., Paola, C.D., Marchetti, A., and Martinelli, M. (2019). Remote Sensing for Maritime Prompt Monitoring. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 7.10.3390/jmse7070202 ↗
8. Bautista-Sánchez, R., Barbosa-Santillán, L.I., and Sánchez-Escobar, J.J. (November, January 27). Statistical Approach in Data Filtering for Prediction Vessel Movements Through Time and Estimation Route Using Historical AIS Data. Proceedings of the Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Xalapa, Mexico.
9. Maritime traffic monitoring using a space-based AIS receiver10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.12.016 ↗
10. A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.069 ↗
11. Climate change risk to global port operations10.1038/s41558-020-00937-z ↗
12. A comprehensive multi-objective optimization model for the vessel scheduling problem in liner shipping10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.027 ↗
13. Model predictive scheduling for container terminals10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00134 ↗
14. Optimizing container terminal operations: A systematic review of operations research applications10.1057/s41278-023-00254-0 ↗
15. A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals10.1016/j.ejor.2014.12.030 ↗
16. Column generation for the multi-port berth allocation problem with port cooperation stability10.1016/j.trb.2023.03.004 ↗
17. Berth allocation and quay crane assignment/scheduling problem under uncertainty: A survey10.1016/j.ejor.2021.12.040 ↗
18. The development of a ship performance model in varying operating conditions based on ANN and regression techniques10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106972 ↗
19. Efficiency and productivity of container terminals in Brazilian ports (2008–2017)10.1016/j.jup.2018.11.006 ↗
20. An analysis of factors affecting the severity of marine accidents10.1016/j.ress.2021.107513 ↗
21. Research in marine accidents: A bibliometric analysis, systematic review and future directions10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115048 ↗
22. Port sustainability and performance: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.009 ↗
23. Vessel turnaround time prediction: A machine learning approach10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107021 ↗
24. Štepec, D., Martinčič, T., Klein, F., Vladušič, D., and Costa, J.P. (July, January 30). Machine Learning based System for Vessel Turnaround Time Prediction. Proceedings of the 2020 21st IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM), Versailles, France.10.1109/MDM48529.2020.00060 ↗
25. Abreu, L., Maciel, I., Alves, J., Braga, L., and Pontes, H. (2025, March 04). Dataset—Stay Time of Ships in Brazilian Ports in 2018. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365589683_Dataset_-_Stay_Time_of_Ships_in_Brazilian_Ports_in_2018?channel=doi&linkId=6379043e54eb5f547ce6ee87&showFulltext=true.
26. Efficiency Container Ports In Brazil: A DEA And FDH Approach
27. Climate change, seaports, and coastal management in Brazil: An overview of the policy framework
28. 20 years of port reform in Brazil: Insights into the reform process
29. Costa, W., Soares-Filho, B., and Nobrega, R. (2022). Can the Brazilian National Logistics Plan Induce Port Competitiveness by Reshaping the Port Service Areas?. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142114567 ↗
30. Cacho, J., Tokarski, A., Thomas, E., and Chkoniya, V. (2021). Port Dada Integration: Opportunities for Optimization and Value Creation, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-7998-6985-6.ch001 ↗
31. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
32. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
33. A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
34. Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R. (2017, January 4–9). LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
35. Extremely randomized trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
36. Louppe, G., Wehenkel, L., Sutera, A., and Geurts, P. (2013, January 5–8). Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
37. James, G.M., Witten, D.M., Hastie, T.J., and Tibshirani, R. (2013). An Introduction to Statistical Learning. Springer Texts in Statistics, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 ↗
38. Support-Vector Networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
39. Idiot’s Bayes—Not So Stupid After All?
40. An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879 ↗
41. Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00527.x ↗
42. State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00938 ↗
43. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
44. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
45. Kohavi, R. (1995, January 20–25). A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, QC, Canada.
46. Menze, B.H., Kelm, B.M., Masuch, R., Himmelreich, U., Bachert, P., Petrich, W., and Hamprecht, F.A. (2009). A comparison of random forest and its Gini importance with standard chemometric methods for the feature selection and classification of spectral data. BMC Bioinform., 10.10.1186/1471-2105-10-213 ↗
47. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.I. (2017, January 4–9). A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
48. A Deep-Learned Embedding Technique for Categorical Features Encoding10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3104357 ↗
49. Grinsztajn, L., Oyallon, E., and Varoquaux, G. Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on typical tabular data? In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA, 28 November–9 December 2022.