Impact of Non-Landslide Sample Sampling Strategies and Model Selection on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of non-landslide sampling strategies on landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA) performance and explored approaches to minimizing uncertainty in model selection. Five non-landslide sampling strategies were evaluated using the random forest (RF) model to generate landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) for each scenario. To assess the impact of these strategies, this study employed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, a confusion matrix, and various statistical indicators. Additionally, the mean susceptibility indices derived from the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), support vector machine (SVM), and RF models were analyzed to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing the uncertainty during model selection. The GBDT, SVM, and RF were selected for their ability to handle complex, nonlinear relationships in the data, superior generalization capability, effective mitigation of overfitting risks, high predictive performance, and robustness. The findings revealed that selecting non-landslide samples from slope units without landslides enhances accuracy and averaging across models mitigated the uncertainty associated with landslide susceptibility models. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that the non-landslide sample selection method significantly improved prediction accuracy, particularly when samples were drawn from very-low-susceptibility zones identified by pre-classified machine learning models. These results highlight the importance of refining sample selection strategies and integrating multiple machine learning models to improve the reliability and accuracy of landslide susceptibility assessments. This approach provides valuable insights for future research and practical applications in risk mitigation and disaster management by offering a more precise depiction of low-susceptibility areas, thereby reducing the occurrence of false positives in landslide prediction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Fire effects on ecosystems · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Future Technology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Landslide susceptibility assessment in complex geological settings: Sensitivity to geological information and insights on its parameterization10.1007/s10346-019-01340-2 ↗
2. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 ↗
3. Innovative approaches to landslide hazard mapping
4. Landslide hazard evaluation: A review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00078-1 ↗
5. Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (West Turkey)10.1007/s10661-011-2352-8 ↗
6. Probabilistic stability analysis of Bazimen landslide with monitored rainfall data and water level fluctuations in Three Gorges Reservoir, China10.1007/s11709-020-0655-y ↗
7. Assessing LNRF, FR, and AHP models in landslide susceptibility mapping index: A comparative study of Nojian watershed in Lorestan province, Iran10.1007/s12665-018-7524-1 ↗
8. A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Uttarakhand area (India)10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.005 ↗
9. Guo, Z., Tian, B., Li, G., Huang, D., Zeng, T., He, J., and Song, D. (2023). Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Loess Plateau of northwest China using three data-driven techniques: A case study from middle Yellow River catchment. Front. Earth Sci., 10.10.3389/feart.2022.1033085 ↗
10. Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in mountainous areas: A case study of the Wuling Mountains, China
11. Landslide susceptibility assessment using k-nearest neighbor algorithm in the southwestern region of China
12. A novel landslide susceptibility mapping approach using support vector machine with the integration of geological and topographical factors. Environ
13. Landslide susceptibility mapping using extremely randomized trees: A case study in the Qinling Mountains, China. Nat
14. Landslide susceptibility modeling using Bayesian networks: A case study of the Sichuan Basin, China
15. Landslide susceptibility assessment using artificial neural networks in the Loess Plateau, China
16. Gradient boosting decision tree for landslide susceptibility modeling: A case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China
17. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest: Application to the Tibetan Plateau
18. Chang, Z.L. (2023). Regional Rainfall-Induced Landslide Hazard Assessment Method Based on Data-Driven and Forming Mechanism. [Ph.D. Thesis, Nanchang University]. (In Chinese).
19. Effectiveness of Newmark-based sampling strategy for coseismic landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning, support vector machine, and logistic regression10.1007/s10064-022-02664-5 ↗
20. How do the landslide and non-landslide sampling strategies impact landslide susceptibility assessment? A catchment-scale case study from China10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.07.026 ↗
21. Validation of an artificial neural network model for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1007/s12665-009-0188-0 ↗
22. Azarafza, M., Azarafza, M., Akgün, H., Atkinson, P.M., and Derakhshani, R. (2021). Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-03585-1 ↗
23. Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Niu, R., and Peng, L. (2017). Integration of information theory, K-means cluster analysis and the logistic regression model for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Three Gorges Area, China. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9090938 ↗
24. Investigation of the influence of nonoccurrence sampling on landslide susceptibility assessment using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.catena.2020.105067 ↗
25. Application of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study
26. Role of Geological Data in Landslide Risk Assessment
27. Landslide susceptibility assessment using spatial interpolation of rainfall data: A case study of the Xijiang River Basin
28. Relationship Between Vegetation Cover (NDVI) and Landslide Susceptibility
29. Impact of Land Use and Vegetation on Landslide Hazard Assessment
30. Rockfall susceptibility assessment along a mountainous road: An evaluation of bivariate statistic, analytical hierarchy process, and frequency ratio10.1007/s12665-017-6471-6 ↗
31. Note on Regression and Inheritance in the Case of Two Parents10.1098/rspl.1895.0041 ↗
32. Nelder, J.A., and Baker, R.J. (2006). Generalized Linear Models, Wiley Online Library.10.1002/0471667196.ess0866.pub2 ↗
33. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
34. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
35. Support vector machines and kernel methods: The new generation of learning machines
36. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
37. A review of technologies on random forests
38. A proposal for an approach to mapping susceptibility to landslides using natural language processing and machine learning10.1007/s10346-021-01643-3 ↗
39. Landslide hazard and risk zonation: Why is it still so difficult?10.1007/s10064-005-0023-0 ↗
40. A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the MultiBoost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling10.1007/s10064-018-1281-y ↗
41. Integrating principal component analysis with statistically-based models for analysis of causal factors and landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparative study from the loess plateau area in Shanxi (China)10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124159 ↗
42. Uncertainty pattern in landslide susceptibility prediction modelling: Effects of different landslide boundaries and spatial shape expressions10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101317 ↗
43. Exploring the effects of the design and quantity of absence data on the performance of random forest-based landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.035 ↗
44. The influence of DEM spatial resolution on landslide susceptibility mapping in the Baxie River basin, NW China10.1007/s11069-020-03899-9 ↗
45. Uncertainty in regional scale assessment of landslide susceptibility using various resolutions10.1007/s11069-023-05865-7 ↗
46. Machine learning-based landslide susceptibility assessment with optimized ratio of landslide to non-landslide samples10.1016/j.gr.2022.05.012 ↗