Progress, Challenges, and Sustainable Perspectives in Nuclear Energy Strategies
Source abstract
Abstract
This bibliometric review of global nuclear energy strategies reveals a renewed interest in this technology as a fundamental part of the energy transition and the fight against climate change. The findings highlight an emerging leadership of China and other Asian countries in scientific production, although the United States and European countries maintain a greater impact in their research. There is an evolution from a purely technical focus to a greater focus on security, energy policy, climate change, and sustainability, reflecting a more holistic understanding of the role of nuclear energy. The 21st century has seen a resurgence of interest in nuclear energy, driven by concerns about climate change, although these topics are still relatively underrepresented in specialized literature. New areas of research are identified, such as integration with renewable energy and advanced applications. Research on public perception and social acceptance has gained sophistication. Surprisingly, an apparent lack of scientific interest in international collaboration is detected, despite its recognized importance in addressing global challenges and promoting the peaceful use of nuclear energy. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the current status and future trends in nuclear energy research and strategies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Risk Perception and Management · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Nuclear and radioactivity studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Technology, Instruction and Design in Engineering and Education Research Group (TiDEE.rg), Catholic University of Ávila, C/Canteros s/n, 05005 Ávila, Spain
Department of Applied Informatics, University of Macedonia, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
Department of Education, University of Nicosia, 2417 Nicosia, Cyprus
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Limitations of Nuclear Power as a Sustainable Energy Source10.3390/su4061173 ↗
2. PRIS IAEA (2024, November 08). The Power Reactor Information System (PRIS). Available online: https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/home.aspx.
3. Fernández-Arias, P., Vergara, D., and Orosa, J.A. (2020). A Global Review of PWR Nuclear Power Plants. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10134434 ↗
4. A Taxonomy of Systems That Combine Utility-Scale Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Technologies10.1016/j.rser.2021.110711 ↗
5. Nuclear Energy—The Solution to Climate Change?10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112363 ↗
6. Dehner, G., McBeth, M.K., Moss, R., and van Woerden, I. (2023). A Zero-Carbon Nuclear Energy Future? Lessons Learned from Perceptions of Climate Change and Nuclear Waste. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16042025 ↗
7. Bushehr Nuclear Power Plants (BNPPs) and the Perspective of Sustainable Energy Development in Iran10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104179 ↗
8. Rahmanta, M.A., Harto, A.W., Agung, A., and Ridwan, M.K. (2023). Nuclear Power Plant to Support Indonesia’s Net Zero Emissions: A Case Study of Small Modular Reactor Technology Selection Using Technology Readiness Level and Levelized Cost of Electricity Comparing Method. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16093752 ↗
9. Fernández-Arias, P., Vergara, D., and Antón-Sancho, Á. (2023). Bibliometric Review and Technical Summary of PWR Small Modular Reactors. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16135168 ↗
10. Experimental Analyses and Computational Simulations of Dilution Events for an SMR Pressurizer Test Facility10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113335 ↗
11. Merk, B., Litskevich, D., Whittle, K.R., Bankhead, M., Taylor, R.J., and Mathers, D. (2017). On a Long Term Strategy for the Success of Nuclear Power. Energies, 10.10.20944/preprints201704.0050.v1 ↗
12. Lee, S., Yoon, B., and Shin, J. (2016). Effects of Nuclear Energy on Sustainable Development and Energy Security: Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Case. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8100979 ↗
13. Vergara, D., Fernández-Arias, P., Lampropoulos, G., and Antón-Sancho, Á. (2024). Hydrogen Revolution in Europe: Bibliometric Review of Industrial Hydrogen Applications for a Sustainable Future. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17153658 ↗
14. Generation-IV Nuclear Power: A Review of the State of the Science10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.059 ↗
15. Hydrogen Storage–Industrial Prospectives10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.121 ↗
16. Improved Nuclear Power Plant Operations and Safety through Performance-Based Safety Regulation10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00080-1 ↗
17. Role and Importance of NDE in Nuclear Power Plant Life Extension10.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.036 ↗
18. Ageing Management and Life Extension of Concrete in Nuclear Power Plants10.1016/j.powtec.2017.08.053 ↗
19. “I Can Live with Nuclear Energy If…”: Exploring Public Perceptions of Nuclear Energy in Singapore10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.060 ↗
20. Nuclear Energy: Status and Future Limitations10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.040 ↗
21. Mondal, K., Martinez, O., and Jain, P. (2024). Advanced Manufacturing and Digital Twin Technology for Nuclear Energy. Front. Energy Res., 12.10.3389/fenrg.2024.1339836 ↗
22. Machine Learning Enabled Advanced Manufacturing in Nuclear Engineering Applications10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110817 ↗
23. Generation IV International Forum: A Decade of Progress through International Cooperation10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.010 ↗
24. The International Technological Nuclear Cooperation Landscape: A New Dataset and Network Analysis10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.024 ↗
25. Gierszewski, J., Młynarkiewicz, Ł., Nowacki, T.R., and Dworzecki, J. (2021). Nuclear Power in Poland’s Energy Transition. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14123626 ↗
26. Fernández-Arias, P., Antón-Sancho, Á., Lampropoulos, G., and Vergara, D. (2024). On Green Hydrogen Generation Technologies: A Bibliometric Review. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14062524 ↗
27. Fernández-Arias, P., Vergara, D., and Antón-Sancho, Á. (2023). Global Review of International Nuclear Waste Management. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16176215 ↗
28. Towards Strategic Agenda for European Nuclear Education, Training, and Knowledge Management10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113001 ↗
29. Human resources challenges in the nuclear industry (knowledge retention and transfer (KRT)) in the United Kingdom (UK) as reference10.47672/ejh.543 ↗
30. Public perceptions and governance of controversial technologies to tackle climate change: Nuclear power, carbon capture and storage, wind, and geoengineering10.1002/wcc.134 ↗
31. Renewable energy and nuclear power towards sustainable development: Characteristics and prospects10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.035 ↗
32. Renewable and nuclear power: A common future?10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.024 ↗
33. Political Ideology and Nuclear Energy: Perception, Proximity, and Trust10.1111/ropr.12489 ↗
34. Iqbal, M., Moss, R., and Van Woerden, I. (2022). Peoples’ Perception towards Nuclear Energy. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15124397 ↗
35. Social Acceptance of Nuclear Power Plants in Korea: The Role of Public Perceptions Following the Fukushima Accident. Renewable and Sustainable
36. Takebayashi, Y., Lyamzina, Y., Suzuki, Y., and Murakami, M. (2017). Risk Perception and Anxiety Regarding Radiation after the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident: A Systematic Qualitative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14.10.3390/ijerph14111306 ↗
37. Effects of the Chernobyl Accident on Public Perceptions of Nuclear Plant Accident Risks10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00522.x ↗
38. Dallenes, H., Geerts, R., Vandermoere, F., and Verbist, G. (2023). The Energy Mix: Understanding People’s Diverging Energy Preferences in Belgium. Soc. Sci., 12.10.3390/socsci12050260 ↗
39. Bilgin, U., and Soner Kara, S. (2024). Identification of Perceived Challenges in the Green Energy Transition by Turkish Society through Sentiment Analysis. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16083367 ↗
40. IAEA (2024). Climate Change and Nuclear Power 2024: Financing Nuclear Energy in Low Carbon Transitions. Climate Change and Nuclear Power 2024: Financing Nuclear Energy in Low Carbon Transitions, IAEA.
41. IAEA (2023). Nuclear Energy and Climate Change A Synthesis of the IAEA Submission to the First Global Stocktake Under the Paris Agreement Questions and Answers on Progress, Challenges and Opportunities, IAEA.
42. Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005 ↗
43. Implementing PRISMA-P: Recommendations for Prospective Authors10.1186/s13643-016-0191-y ↗
44. Cortese, T.T.P., de Almeida, J.F.S., Batista, G.Q., Storopoli, J.E., Liu, A., and Yigitcanlar, T. (2022). Understanding Sustainable Energy in the Context of Smart Cities: A PRISMA Review. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15072382 ↗
45. Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Xia, B., and Li, R.Y.M. (2022). Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8.10.3390/joitmc8010045 ↗
46. Sustainable Transportation in Africa: A Bibliometric, Visualisation and Thematic Analysis10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142727 ↗
47. A Bibliometric Analysis of Corona Pandemic in Social Sciences: A Review of Influential Aspects and Conceptual Structure10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008733 ↗
48. Scientific Production and Thematic Breakthroughs in Smart Learning Environments: A Bibliometric Analysis10.1186/s40561-020-00145-4 ↗
49. A bibliometric analysis of topic modelling studies (2000–2017)10.1177/0165551519877049 ↗
50. Bibliometric Analysis on Tendency and Topics of Artificial Intelligence over Last Decade10.1007/s00542-019-04426-y ↗
51. Pesta, B., Fuerst, J., and Kirkegaard, E.O.W. (2018). Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles. J. Intell., 6.10.3390/jintelligence6040046 ↗
52. The SHAMISEN Project: Challenging Historical Recommendations for Preparedness, Response and Surveillance of Health and Well-Being in Case of Nuclear Accidents: Lessons Learnt from Chernobyl and Fukushima10.1016/j.envint.2020.106200 ↗
53. Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima: An analysis of traditional and new media coverage of nuclear accidents and radiation10.1177/0096340211421587 ↗
54. Fernández-Arias, P., Antón-Sancho, Á., Lampropoulos, G., and Vergara, D. (2024). Emerging Trends and Challenges in Pink Hydrogen Research. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17102291 ↗
55. Nuclear Lessons for Cyber Security?
56. Chang, I.C., Yu, T.K., Chang, Y.J., and Yu, T.Y. (2021). Applying Text Mining, Clustering Analysis, and Latent Dirichlet Allocation Techniques for Topic Classification of Environmental Education Journals. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su131910856 ↗
57. Quatrini, E., Colabianchi, S., Costantino, F., and Tronci, M. (2022). Clustering Application for Condition-Based Maintenance in Time-Varying Processes: A Review Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12020814 ↗