Digital Inequalities in China in 2020: Spatial and Multivariate Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
China’s digital divide is explored through spatial and multivariate analysis. The dependent variables include general uses of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and mobile devices, measures of ICT infrastructure, purposeful uses for software services, and purposeful uses of e-commerce. Independent variables include a variety of demographic, economic, educational, ethnic, innovation, and knowledge production indicators. Data come from the China Yearbook. Theoretically, the study draws on the Spatially Aware Technology Utilization Model (SATUM). Digital disparities in Chinese provinces are analyzed using regression analysis, spatial autocorrelation, and k-means cluster analysis. The important correlates associated with digital inequality are expenditure for science and technology, income, R&D investment, full-time teachers, non-Han (minority) population, and proportion of urbanization. Longitudinal comparison reveals factors influencing ICT changes to be expenditure on science and technology, the unemployment rate, and college degree. Among the cluster findings are geographic concentrations of digital variables in Shanghai and Beijing and marked spatial pattern differences in central and central–east China between variable groups. Provincial and national policy implications, which are compared to China’s five-year plans, include an emphasis on science and technology, technology education in all provinces, support for higher provincial incomes, and ICT training for the non-Han population. These steps are especially important in ICT-deprived provinces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ICT Impact and Policies · Smart Cities and Technologies · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Business and Society, University of Redlands, Redlands, CA 92373, USA
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. CEIC (2023). Exports: ICT Goods, CEIC Data Ltd.. Available online: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/exports-ict-goods.
2. Investigation of e-commerce in China in a geographical perspective10.1111/grow.12307 ↗
3. China’s prefectural digital divide: Spatial analysis and multivariate determinants of ICT diffusion10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102072 ↗
4. UN Human Rights Council (2016). The Promotion, Protection, and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet, United Nations. Oral Revisions of 30 June, 32nd Session, Agenda Item 3.
5. Ragnedda, M., and Muschert, G.W. (2013). A theory of the digital divide. The Digital Divide: The Internet and Social Inequality in International Perspective, Routledge.10.4324/9780203069769 ↗
6. van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide, Polity Press.
7. New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes10.3102/0091732X09349791 ↗
8. Galliers, R.D., and Stein, M.K. (2017). Digital divides: Past, present, and future. The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems, Routledge.10.4324/9781315619361 ↗
9. Determinants of internet skills, uses, and outcomes. A Systematic review of the second and third-level digital divide10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007 ↗
10. Progress of e-development in China since 199810.1016/j.telpol.2017.03.001 ↗
11. Unpacking the Effect of IT Capability on the Performance of Export-focused SMEs: A Report from China10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00303.x ↗
12. Digital divide between urban and rural regions in China. Electron10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00253.x ↗
13. The Digital Divide in Individual E-Commerce Utilization in China: Results from a National Survey10.1177/0266666912450168 ↗
14. The geography of online shopping in China and its key drivers10.1177/23998083211002189 ↗
15. ECT and Socio-economic Development: Evidence from a Spatial Panel Data Analysis in China10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102173 ↗
16. Broadband and Economic Growth in China: An Empirical Study during the COVID-19 pandemic period10.1016/j.tele.2020.101533 ↗
17. Development of the Internet and digital divide in China: A spatial analysis
18. Determinants of China’s Technology Availability and Utilization 2006–2009: A Spatial Analysis10.1080/01972243.2012.739266 ↗
19. Measuring spatial differences of informatization in China10.1007/s11769-013-0646-1 ↗
20. The digital divide: Current and future research directions
21. Pick, J., and Sarkar, A. (2016, January 5–8). Theories of the digital divide: Critical comparison. Proceedings of the IEEE 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Koloa, HI, USA.10.1109/HICSS.2016.484 ↗
22. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press. [5th ed.].
23. Internet adoption by the elderly: Employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide10.1057/ejis.2013.19 ↗
24. The digital divide and t-government in the United States: Using the technology acceptance model to understand usage10.1057/ejis.2010.64 ↗
25. Pick, J., and Sarkar, A. (2015). The Global Digital Divides: Explaining Change, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-46602-5 ↗
26. The role of information and communication technologies in socioeconomic development: Towards a multi-dimensional framework10.1080/02681102.2019.1596654 ↗
27. Digital Divide and A Spatial Investigation of Convergence in ICT Development Across Provinces in Indonesia
28. Determinants of digitalization and digital divide in Sub-Saharan African economies: A spatial Durbin analysis10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102224 ↗
29. Covid-19 Pandemic and Disparity in Household Adaptations to School Lockdown: Redressing the Myth of Educational Equality10.5296/ije.v14i3.19988 ↗
30. Information infrastructure, governance, and socio-economic development in developing countries10.1057/ejis.2008.56 ↗
31. Ben, S., Bosc, R., Jinpu, J., Li, W., Simonelli, F., and Zhang, R. (2017). Digital Infrastructure: Overcoming the Digital Divide in China and the European Union, The Centre for European Policy Studies. Available online: https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/digital-infrastructure-overcoming-digital-divide-china-and-european-union/.
32. Technology and society: Socioeconomic influences on technological sectors for United States counties10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.10.001 ↗
33. Sarkar, A., Pick, J., and Moss, G. (2017, January 4–7). Geographic patterns and socio-economic influences on mobile internet access and use in United States counties. Proceedings of the IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Village, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2017.502 ↗
34. Multivariate and geospatial analysis of technology utilization in US counties10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102572 ↗
35. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2021). China Statistical Yearbook, China Statistics Press.
36. China’s growing it services and software industry: Challenges and implications
37. Statista (2023). Penetration Rate of Internet Users in China from 2008 to June 2022, Statista. Available online: www.statista.com.
38. Statista (2023). IT Services—China, Statista. Available online: www.statista.com.
39. Developing ICT Services in a Low-Resource Development Context10.7250/csimq.2016-9.05 ↗
40. Perrin, A., and Duggan, M. (2015). Americans’ Internet Access: 2000–2015, Report; Pew Research Center.
41. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2022). New NTIA Data Show Enduring Barriers to Closing the Digital Divide, Achieving Digital Equity, U.S. Department of Commerce. May 11 Report.
42. Japan’s prefectural digital divide: A multivariate analysis10.1016/j.telpol.2014.05.004 ↗
43. Pick, J., Sarkar, A., and Rosales, J. (2019). Social Media Use in American Counties: Geography and Determinants. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8090424 ↗
44. Local Geographies of Digital Inequality10.1177/0894439317693332 ↗
45. Quality of China’s Official Statistics: A Brief Review of Academic Perspectives
46. Regional innovation system: Theoretical approach and empirical study of China10.1007/s11769-003-0016-5 ↗
47. Koleski, K. (2017). The 13th Five Year Plan, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Staff Research Report.
48. Lim, E.J., Stubbs, J., and Xu, Q. (2024, April 14). Working with Chinese Government Data Sets: Potential Issues and Solutions. Available online: https://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/2511/1/185-lim-en.pdf.
49. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 ↗
50. Chinese statistics: Classification systems and data sources10.1080/15387216.2014.908312 ↗
51. Hair, J., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., and Sarstedt, J. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, SAGE Publications. [3rd ed.].10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 ↗
52. Kline, R.B. (2010). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guilford Press. [3rd ed.].
53. Kline, R.B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guilford Press. [5th ed.].
54. Software Review: Software Programs for Structural Equation Modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL10.1177/073428299801600407 ↗
55. Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation10.1007/BF02294248 ↗
56. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2021). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-1-0716-1418-1 ↗
57. Developing comparable questions in cross-national surveys
58. Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.036 ↗
59. Multiscale contextual poverty in the Netherlands: Within and between-municipality inequality10.1007/s12061-021-09394-3 ↗
60. Casali, Y., Aydin, N.Y., and Comes, T. (2024). A data-driven approach to analyse the co-evolution of urban systems through a resilience lens: A Helsinki case study. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci.10.1177/23998083241235246 ↗
61. Campbell, D.T., and Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Rand McNally.
62. Change Scores as Dependent Variables in Regression Analysis10.2307/271083 ↗
63. Examining change using regression analysis: Three approaches compared10.1080/02732173.1991.9981960 ↗
64. A dendrite method for cluster analysis
65. Central Compilation and Translation Press (2016). The 13th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China, Central Compilation and Translation Press.
66. Center for Security and Emerging Technology (2019). 13th National Five-Year Plan for the Development of Strategic Emerging Industries, Center for Security and Emerging Technology, Georgetown University. Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China.
67. Center for Security and Emerging Technology (2021). Outline of the People’s Republic of China 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and Long-Range Objectives for 2035, Center for Security and Emerging Technology, Georgetown University.
68. The determinants of the global digital divide: A cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration10.1093/oep/gpl024 ↗
69. Auxier, B., and Anderson, M. (2021). Social Media Use in 2021, Pew Research Center.
70. The Diffusion of Mobile Internet in Japan10.1080/01972240802356067 ↗
71. Wang, T. (2023). Making Sense of China’s Economy, Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9781003310938 ↗