Show source-provided references
1. (2024, March 18). Social Isolation and Loneliness. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/social-determinants-of-health/demographic-change-and-healthy-ageing/social-isolation-and-loneliness.
3. The association between physical fitness, sports club participation and body mass index on health-related quality of life in primary school children from a socioeconomically deprived area of England
10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101557 ↗5. Karna, E., Aavikko, L., Rohner, R., Gallistl, V., Pihlainen, K., Muller, C., Ehlers, A., Bevilacqua, R., Strano, S., and Maranesi, E. (2022). A Multilevel Model of Older Adults’ Appropriation of ICT and Acquisition of Digital Literacy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.
10.3390/ijerph192315714 ↗6. Kristoffersson, A., and Lindén, M. (2022). A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Physical Activity. Sensors, 22.
10.3390/s22020573 ↗8. Yamatsu, K., and Narazaki, K. (2022). Feasibility of the Remote Physical Activity Follow-Up Intervention after the Face-to-Face Program for Healthy Middle-Aged Adults: A Randomized Trial Using ICT and Mobile Technology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.
10.3390/ijerph19084922 ↗9. Dimensions of Internet of Things: Technological Taxonomy Architecture Applications and Open Challenges—A Systematic Review
10.1155/2022/9148373 ↗11. (2024, March 20). 4 Different Types of Caregivers. Available online: https://www.nautilusshc.com/blog/4-types-of-caregivers.
12. (2024, March 20). Bloc State Management Library. Available online: https://bloclibrary.dev.
13. Yang, X., and Huang, B. (2015, January 23–25). An accurate step detection algorithm using unconstrained smartphones. Proceedings of the 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2015 CCDC), Qingdao, China.
10.1109/CCDC.2015.7161816 ↗14. Nugent, C., Cleland, I., Nugent, L., Estevez, M.E., Lendinez, A.M., Craig, D., Agnoloni, F., and Tamburini, E. (2023). International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, Springer.
15. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
10.2307/249008 ↗18. Adoption of mobile health services using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model: Self-efficacy and privacy concerns
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944976 ↗19. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale
20. The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation
10.1287/isre.1070.0165 ↗21. Marcus, A. (2014). Design, User Experience, and Usability. Theories, Methods, and Tools for Designing the User Experience, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-07668-3 ↗22. Measurement of digital literacy among older adults: Systematic review
10.2196/26145 ↗24. Wilson, J., Heinsch, M., Betts, D., Booth, D., and Kay-Lambkin, F. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, 21.
10.1186/s12889-021-11623-w ↗26. Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. (1990, January 1–5). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings of the CHI ’90: Conference on Human Factors in Computing, Seattle, WA, USA.
10.1145/97243.97281 ↗27. Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for Aging Well: A Scoping Review
28. Enabling Assistive Technologies to Shape the Future of the Intensive Senior-Centred Care: A Case Study Approach
10.24846/v26i3y201710 ↗30. Remote patient monitoring and classifying using the internet of things platform combined with cloud computing
10.1186/s40537-021-00507-w ↗33. Awadalla, M., Kausar, F., and Ahshan, R. (2021). Developing an IoT Platform for the Elderly Health Care. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 12.
10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120453 ↗34. Stavrotheodoros, S., Kaklanis, N., Votis, K., and Tzovaras, D. (2018). IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Springer.
35. Lorusso, L., Mosmondor, M., Grguric, A., Toccafondi, L., D’Onofrio, G., Russo, S., Lampe, J., Pihl, T., Mayer, N., and Vignani, G. (2023). Design and Evaluation of Personalized Services to Foster Active Aging: The Experience of Technology Pre-Validation in Italian Pilots. Sensors, 23.
10.3390/s23020797 ↗36. A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors and IoT-Based Monitoring Applications for Older Adults - a Focus on Ageing Population and Independent Living
10.1007/s10916-019-1365-7 ↗37. Rojo-Perez, F., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, V., Molina-Martinez, M.A., Fernandez-Mayoralas, G., Sanchez-Gonzalez, D., Rojo-Abuin, J.M., Ayala, A., Rodriguez-Blazquez, C., Calderon-Larranaga, A., and Ribeiro, O. (2022). Active ageing profiles among older adults in Spain: A Multivariate analysis based on SHARE study. PLoS ONE, 17.
10.1371/journal.pone.0272549 ↗40. Older Adults’ and Clinicians’ Perspectives on a Smart Health Platform for the Aging Population: Design and Evaluation Study
10.2196/29623 ↗41. D’Onofrio, G., Fiorini, L., Toccafondi, L., Rovini, E., Russo, S., Ciccone, F., Giuliani, F., Sancarlo, D., and Cavallo, F. (2021). Pilots for Healthy and Active Ageing (PHArA-ON) Project: Definition of New Technological Solutions for Older People in Italian Pilot Sites Based on Elicited User Needs. Sensors, 22.
10.3390/s22010163 ↗42. Liu, C.H., and Tu, J.F. (2020). Development of an IoT-Based Health Promotion System for Seniors. Sustainability, 12.
10.3390/su12218946 ↗46. Chaparro, J.D., Ruiz, J.F.B., Romero, M.J.S., Peño, C.B., Irurtia, L.U., Perea, M.G., Garcia, X.D.T., Molina, F.J.V., Grigoleit, S., and Lopez, J.C. (2021). The SHAPES Smart Mirror Approach for Independent Living, Healthy and Active Ageing. Sensors, 21.
10.3390/s21237938 ↗47. Hvalič-Touzery, S., Šetinc, M., and Dolničar, V. (2022). Benefits of a Wearable Activity Tracker with Safety Features for Older Adults: An Intervention Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.
10.3390/ijerph192315723 ↗48. Continued use intention of wearable health technologies among the elderly: An enablers and inhibitors perspective
49. (2024, May 17). Index—FHIR v5.0.0. Available online: http://hl7.org/fhir.