Verification and validation of ICME methods and models for aerospace applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) model verification and validation (V&V) is difficult because materials processing, microstructural evolution, and property development contain a rich mix of length and time scales with an equally complex set of interacting phenomena and mechanisms. Beyond these difficulties, engineers who adapt these models rarely generate independent validation data sets to confirm model adequacy, quantify uncertainty, and identify potential error sources. Even when a validation data set is produced and applied, the range of model applicability is limited by the range on input model parameters contained within the data set. In this paper we provide a summary of a recommended approach to ICME V&V and include descriptions of V&V planning checklists, an ICME Tool Maturity Level assessment guide and examples of how such practitioner aids might be employed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. National Research Council (NRC), Integrated Computational Materials Engineering: A Transformational Discipline for Improved Competitiveness and National Security. 2nd edition. The National Academies Press, Washington; 2008:70–71.
2. Cowles BA, Backman DG, Dutton RE: The Development and Implementation of Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME),” for Aerospace Applications, Models, Databases, and Simulation Tools Needed for the Realization of Integrated Computational Materials Engineering, Proceedings of the Symposium, Materials Science & Technology. ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio; 2010:44–60.
3. Cowles BA, Backman DG: dvancement and Implementation of ICME for Aerospace Applications. , ; 2010. AFRL-RX-TP-2010–4151 AFRL-RX-TP-2010-4151
4. Cowles BA, Backman DG: Verification and Validation of ICME Methods and Models for Aerospace Applications – V&V Guidelines and Recommended Best Practice,” summary document prepared for AFRL/RXLM. , ; 2011.
5. Cowles BA, Backman DG: Verification and Validation of ICME Methods and Models for Aerospace Applications – V&V Guidelines and Recommended Best Practice,” spreadsheet tools and practitioner aides prepared for AFRL/RXLM. , ; 2011.
6. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations. , ; 1998. AIAA G-077- AIAA G-077-
7. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers: “Guide for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics. , ; 2006. ASME V&V 10 ASME V&V 10
8. Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP):“Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness. , ; 2011. Available at [http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/materials_genome_initiative-final.pdf]
9. Thacker B: “Verification and Validation for Computational Solid Mechanics. , ;
10. Department of Defense Instruction , ; 2008. Number 5000.02, December 8
11. Defense Acquisition Guidebook, ; [https://dag.dau.mil/Pages/Default.aspx]
12. Oberkampf WL, Pilch M, Trucano TG: Predictive Capability Maturity Model for Computational Modeling and Simulation," Sandia report SAND2007–5948. Sandia National Laboratories, ; 2007.10.2172/976951 ↗
13. NASA-STD-7009, Standard for Models and Simulations, NASA Technical Standard, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. , ; 2008.
14. Morris RJ: “Validation of a Probabilistic HCF Fatigue Prediction System - An Industry Perspective,” 8th International HCF Conference. , Monterey; 2003.
15. NASA: “Guidelines for Preparing Project Risk Management Plans”, New Millennium Program. , ; 2005.
16. Myhr OR, Grong O: Acta mater. 2000, 48: 1605–1615. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00435-810.1016/S1359-6454(99)00435-8 ↗
17. Myhr OR, Grong O, Andersen SJ: Acta mater.. 2001, 49: 65–75. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00301-310.1016/S1359-6454(00)00301-3 ↗
18. Schlesinger S: Terminology for Model Credibility. Simulation 1979,32(3):103–104.10.1177/003754977903200304 ↗
19. Ball DL, Watton JD: Fatigue Life Variability in Large Aluminum Forgings with Residual Stress,” 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Colorado, Denver; 2011.
20. AFRL White Paper: Advancement and Implementation of ICME for Aerospace Applications”. Cowles and D.G. Backman, ; 2010.
21. Oberkampf WL: SIAM Conference on Computational Science & Engineering. FLA, Miami; 2009.
22. G.E.P. Box, N. R. Draper: Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces”. Wiley, ; 1987:424.