journal article·2024-04-23Open access

Detecting Fatigue during Exoskeleton-Assisted Trunk Flexion Tasks: A Machine Learning Approach

Pranav Madhav Kuber, Hrushikesh Godbole, Ehsan Rashedi

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 9

Abstract

Back-Support Industrial Exoskeletons (BSIEs) can be beneficial in reducing the risk of injury due to overexertion during trunk flexion tasks. Most real-world tasks include complex body movements, leading to mixed outcomes that necessitate field-based methods for detecting overall physical demands. Monitoring fatigue can be beneficial in this regard to ensure that benefits of BSIEs are translated to the real world. Our experiment included 14 participants, who performed 30 repetitions of 45° trunk-flexion while assisted by a BSIE, first without fatigue and then at medium-high back fatigue (7/10 in the Borg scale). We extracted 135 features from recorded muscle activity, trunk motion, and whole-body stability across bending, transition, and retraction portions of each trunk-flexion cycle. Four classification algorithms, namely Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost (XGB), were implemented to assess fatigue prediction. XGB (Accuracy: 86.1%, Recall: 86%, Specificity: 86.3%) was effective in classifying fatigue with data obtained from a single EMG sensor located on the lower back (erector spinae) muscle. Meanwhile, stability measures showed high predictability with both RF (92.9%, 91.9%, 94.1%) and XGB (93.5, 94.1%, 93.1%). Findings demonstrate the success of force plates, and when replaced by pressure insoles, they can facilitate real-world fatigue detection during BSIE-assisted trunk-flexion tasks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, 1 Lomb Memorial Dr, Rochester, NY 14623, USA

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023). Employer Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses.
2. Ergonomic Optimization of a Manufacturing System Work Cell in a Virtual Environment10.14311/872 ↗
3. Multi-Position Ergonomic Computer Workstation Design to Increase Comfort of Computer Work10.1016/j.ergon.2015.10.005 ↗
4. Dubina, K.S., Ice, L., Kim, J.-L., and Rieley, M.J. (2021). Projections Overview and Highlights, 2020–30.10.21916/mlr.2021.20 ↗
5. A Systematic Review on Lower-Limb Industrial Exoskeletons: Evaluation Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions10.1007/s10439-023-03242-w ↗
6. A Systematic Review on Evaluation Strategies for Field Assessment of Upper-Body Industrial Exoskeletons: Current Practices and Future Trends10.1007/s10439-022-03003-1 ↗
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016). Incidence Rates for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses with Days Away from Work by Selected Occupations.
8. The Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Muscle Activity, Discomfort and Endurance Time in Forward Bending Work10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.003 ↗
9. Effectiveness of an On-Body Lifting Aid at Reducing Low Back Physical Demands during an Automotive Assembly Task: Assessment of EMG Response and User Acceptability10.1016/j.apergo.2009.01.006 ↗
10. High-Force Soft Printable Pneumatics for Soft Robotic Applications10.1089/soro.2016.0030 ↗
11. Effect of Trunk Flexion Angle and Time on Lumbar and Abdominal Muscle Activity While Wearing a Passive Back-Support Exosuit Device during Simple Posture-Maintenance Tasks10.1080/00140139.2023.2191908 ↗
12. Kazerooni, H., Tung, W., and Pillai, M. (November, January 28). Evaluation of Trunk-Supporting Exoskeleton. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2019, Washington, DC, USA.10.1177/1071181319631261 ↗
13. Effects of Industrial Back-Support Exoskeletons on Body Loading and User Experience: An Updated Systematic Review10.1080/00140139.2020.1870162 ↗
14. Versatile and Non-Versatile Occupational Back-Support Exoskeletons: A Comparison in Laboratory and Field Studies10.1017/wtc.2021.9 ↗
15. The Effect of a Passive Trunk Exoskeleton on Metabolic Costs during Lifting and Walking10.1080/00140139.2019.1602288 ↗
16. A Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton for Manual Materials Handling: Reduction of Low Back Loading and Metabolic Effort during Repetitive Lifting10.1080/24725838.2021.2005720 ↗
17. The Effect of Control Strategies for an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton on Spine Loading and Kinematics during Lifting10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.044 ↗
18. The Effect of On-Body Lift Assistive Device on the Lumbar 3D Dynamic Moments and EMG during Asymmetric Freestyle Lifting10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.012 ↗
19. Neurophysiological, Muscular, and Perceptual Adaptations of Exoskeleton Use over Days during Overhead Work with Competing Cognitive Demands10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104097 ↗
20. An Adaptable Human Fatigue Evaluation System10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.131 ↗
21. The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale10.1093/occmed/kqx063 ↗
22. Stastny, P., Gołaś, A., Blazek, D., Maszczyk, A., Wilk, M., Pietraszewski, P., Petr, M., Uhlir, P., and Zajac, A. (2017). A Systematic Review of Surface Electromyography Analyses of the Bench Press Movement Task. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0171632 ↗
23. Effects of Two Passive Back-Support Exoskeletons on Postural Balance during Quiet Stance and Functional Limits of Stability10.1016/j.jelekin.2021.102516 ↗
24. Repetitive Lifting Tasks Fatigue the Back Muscles and Increase the Bending Moment Acting on the Lumbar Spine10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00086-4 ↗
25. Therapeutic Effects of Reaching with Forward Bending of Trunk on Postural Stability, Dynamic Balance, and Gait in Individuals with Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke10.1589/jpts.27.2447 ↗
26. Impact of Two Postural Assist Exoskeletons on Biomechanical Loading of the Lumbar Spine10.1016/j.apergo.2018.09.006 ↗
27. Product Ergonomics in Industrial Exoskeletons: Potential Enhancements for Workforce Safety and Efficiency10.1080/1463922X.2020.1850905 ↗
28. Towards Reducing Risk of Injury in Nursing: Design and Analysis of a New Passive Exoskeleton for Torso Twist Assist10.1177/2327857921101141 ↗
29. Machine Learning in Manufacturing: Advantages, Challenges, and Applications
30. Shafighfard, T., Kazemi, F., Bagherzadeh, F., Mieloszyk, M., and Yoo, D.Y. (2024). Chained Machine Learning Model for Predicting Load Capacity and Ductility of Steel Fiber–Reinforced Concrete Beams. Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 1–22.10.1111/mice.13164 ↗
31. Applying Machine Learning to Continuously Monitored Physiological Data10.1007/s10877-018-0219-z ↗
32. A Review on the Role of Machine Learning in Enabling IoT Based Healthcare Applications10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059858 ↗
33. Machine Learning in Human Movement Biomechanics: Best Practices, Common Pitfalls, and New Opportunities10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.09.009 ↗
34. Gurchiek, R.D., Cheney, N., and McGinnis, R.S. (2019). Estimating Biomechanical Time-Series with Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques. Sensors, 19.10.20944/preprints201911.0006.v1 ↗
35. Matijevich, E.S., Volgyesi, P., and Zelik, K.E. (2021). A Promising Wearable Solution for the Practical and Accurate Monitoring of Low Back Loading in Manual Material Handling. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21020340 ↗
36. Fatigue Evaluation through Machine Learning and a Global Fatigue Descriptor10.1155/2020/6484129 ↗
37. Estimating Knee Joint Load Using Acoustic Emissions During Ambulation10.1007/s10439-020-02641-7 ↗
38. Abdollahi, M., Rashedi, E., Jahangiri, S., Kuber, P.M., Azadeh-Fard, N., and Dombovy, M. (2024). Fall Risk Assessment in Stroke Survivors: A Machine Learning Model Using Detailed Motion Data from Common Clinical Tests and Motor-Cognitive Dual-Tasking. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24030812 ↗
39. Machine Learning-Based Seismic Fragility and Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structures10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107761 ↗
40. A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Fatigue during Repetitive Physical Tasks10.1007/s00779-023-01718-z ↗
41. Aguirre, A., Pinto, M.J., Cifuentes, C.A., Perdomo, O., Díaz, C.A.R., and Múnera, M. (2021). Machine Learning Approach for Fatigue Estimation in Sit-to-Stand Exercise. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21155006 ↗
42. A Machine Learning Approach to Detect Changes in Gait Parameters Following a Fatiguing Occupational Task10.1080/00140139.2018.1442936 ↗
43. Pinto-Bernal, M.J., Cifuentes, C.A., Perdomo, O., Rincón-Roncancio, M., and Múnera, M. (2021). A Data-Driven Approach to Physical Fatigue Management Using Wearable Sensors to Classify Four Diagnostic Fatigue States. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21196401 ↗
44. Automatic Recognition of Gait Patterns in Human Motor Disorders Using Machine Learning: A Review10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.12.006 ↗
45. Surface Electromyography Based Muscle Fatigue Detection Using High-Resolution Time-Frequency Methods and Machine Learning Algorithms10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.10.024 ↗
46. Machine Learning-Based Identification and Classification of Physical Fatigue Levels: A Novel Method Based on a Wearable Insole Device10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103404 ↗
47. Evaluation of Upper Limb Muscle Fatigue Based on Surface Electromyography10.1007/s11427-011-4229-z ↗
48. Human Movement Analysis as a Measure for Fatigue: A Hidden Markov-Based Approach10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2291327 ↗
49. Chen, S.W., Liaw, J.W., Chan, H.L., Chang, Y.J., and Ku, C.H. (2014). A Real-Time Fatigue Monitoring and Analysis System for Lower Extremity Muscles with Cycling Movement. Sensors, 14.10.3390/s140712410 ↗
50. Zhang, L., Diraneyya, M.M., Ryu, J., Haas, C.T., and Abdel-Rahman, E. (2018). Assessment of Jerk As a Method of Physical Fatigue Detection, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/DETC2018-86289 ↗
51. Jiang, Y., Hernandez, V., Venture, G., Kulić, D., and Chen, B.K. (2021). A Data-Driven Approach to Predict Fatigue in Exercise Based on Motion Data from Wearable Sensors or Force Plate. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21041499 ↗
52. Ameli, S., Stirling, D., Naghdy, F., Naghdy, G., and Aghmesheh, M. (2013, January 9–12). Assessing the Impact of Fatigue on Gait Using Inertial Sensors. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, AIM 2013, Wollongong, Australia.10.1109/AIM.2013.6584109 ↗
53. Hernandez, G., Valles, D., Wierschem, D.C., Koldenhoven, R.M., Koutitas, G., Mendez, F.A., Aslan, S., and Jimenez, J. (2020, January 6–8). Machine Learning Techniques for Motion Analysis of Fatigue from Manual Material Handling Operations Using 3D Motion Capture Data. Proceedings of the 2020 10th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference CCWC 2020, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CCWC47524.2020.9031222 ↗
54. Smartphone-Based Human Fatigue Level Detection Using Machine Learning Approaches10.1080/00140139.2020.1858185 ↗
55. Nakane, H., Toyama, J., and Kudo, M. (2011, January 8–10). Fatigue Detection Using a Pressure Sensor Chair. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, GrC 2011, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.10.1109/GRC.2011.6122646 ↗
56. Reliability of Single-Leg Balance and Landing Tests in Rugby Union; Prospect of Using Postural Control to Monitor Fatigue
57. Biomechanical Analysis of Risk Factors for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders during Repetitive Lifting Task in Construction Workers10.1016/j.autcon.2017.07.007 ↗
58. (2023, October 17). SENIAM Project (Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles). Available online: http://www.seniam.org/.
59. (2023, October 17). VICON Nexus Documentation. Available online: https://docs.vicon.com/display/Nexus212/Nexus+Documentation.
60. Ergonomic Evaluation of a Wearable Assistive Device for Overhead Work10.1080/00140139.2014.952682 ↗
61. Hefferle, M., Snell, M., and Kluth, K. (2021). Influence of Two Industrial Overhead Exoskeletons on Perceived Strain—A Field Study in the Automotive Industry, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-51758-8_13 ↗
62. An EMG-Based Model to Estimate Lumbar Muscle Forces and Spinal Loads during Complex, High-Effort Tasks: Development and Application to Residential Construction Using Prefabricated Walls10.1016/j.ergon.2011.03.004 ↗
63. Heydari, H., Hoviattalab, M., Azghani, M.R., Ramezanzadehkoldeh, M., and Parnianpour, M. (2013). Investigation on a Developed Wearable Assistive Device (WAD) in Reduction Lumbar Muscles Activity. Biomed. Eng. Appl. Basis Commun., 25.10.4015/S101623721350035X ↗
64. Fall Risk Prediction in Multiple Sclerosis Using Postural Sway Measures: A Machine Learning Approach10.1038/s41598-019-52697-2 ↗
65. Correlation between Electromyographic Spectral Changes and Subjective Assessment of Lumbar Muscle Fatigue in Subjects without Pain from the Lower Back10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00053-9 ↗
66. Relationship between Perceived Exertion and Mean Power Frequency of the EMG Signal from the Upper Trapezius Muscle during Isometric Shoulder Elevation10.1007/s00421-005-0014-7 ↗
67. Bae, J., Kong, K., Byl, N., and Tomizuka, M. (2011). A Mobile Gait Monitoring System for Abnormal Gait Diagnosis and Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study for Parkinson Disease Patients. J. Biomech. Eng., 133.10.1115/1.4003525 ↗
68. A Device to Monitor Fatigue Level in Order-Picking10.1108/IMDS-05-2017-0182 ↗
69. A Data-Driven Approach to Modeling Physical Fatigue in the Workplace Using Wearable Sensors10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.001 ↗
70. Raghuraman, R.N., Barbieri, D., Aviles, J., and Srinivasan, D. (2023, January 23–27). Comparison of Soft vs. Rigid Back Support Exoskeletons through Psychophysical and Biomechanical Approaches during Load Handling. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2023, Liverpool, UK.10.1177/21695067231192532 ↗
71. An Ergonomic Assessment Tool for Evaluating the Effect of Back Exoskeletons on Injury Risk10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103619 ↗
72. Poon, N., van Engelhoven, L., Kazerooni, H., and Harris, C. (November, January 28). Evaluation of a Trunk Supporting Exoskeleton for Reducing Muscle Fatigue. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2019, Washington, DC, USA.10.1177/1071181319631491 ↗
73. Side-Effects and Adverse Events of a Shoulder- and Back-Support Exoskeleton in Workers: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104042 ↗