Estimating the Uncertainty of Measurements for Various Methods and 3D Printed Parts
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a study on the dimensional accuracy analysis of models produced by 3D printing technology—Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF). Geometric measurements were conducted using a dial caliper, a 3D scanner and a coordinate measuring machine. In addition, a statistical analysis of the test results was carried out, considering the division into different numbers of test samples (3, 5, 10, 20, 30). The analysis of the test results made it possible to assess the influence of the measuring tools used and the number of samples tested on the final measurement result, as well as to determine the consequences associated with it.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, 25-314 Kielce, Poland
Central Office of Measures, Elektoralna 2, 00-139 Warsaw, Poland
Department of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB–Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. An analysis of the surface geometric structure and geometric accuracy of cylindrical gear teeth manufactured with the direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) method
2. Adamczak, S., Zmarzly, P., Kozior, T., and Gogolewski, D. (2017, January 15–18). Analysis of the dimensional accuracy of casting models manufactured by fused deposition modeling technology. Proceedings of the 23 rd International Conference Engineering Mechanics, Svratka, Czech Republic.
3. Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: A review10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.001 ↗
4. Defect inspection technologies for additive manufacturing10.1088/2631-7990/abe0d0 ↗
5. Turek, P., Budzik, G., Sęp, J., Oleksy, M., Józwik, J., Przeszłowski, Ł., Paszkiewicz, A., Kochmański, Ł., and Żelechowski, D. (2020). An analysis of the casting polymer mold wear manufactured using polyjet method based on the measurement of the surface topography. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12123029 ↗
6. Problem of non-measured points in surface texture measurements10.1515/mms-2017-0046 ↗
7. Lesiak, P., Pogorzelec, K., Bochenek, A., Sobotka, P., Bednarska, K., Anuszkiewicz, A., Osuch, T., Sienkiewicz, M., Marek, P., and Nawotka, M. (2022). Three-Dimensional-Printed Mechanical Transmission Element with a Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor Embedded in a Replaceable Measuring Head. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22093381 ↗
8. Quantitative comparison of cylindricity profiles measured with different methods using legendre-fourier coefficients10.2478/v10178-010-033-5 ↗
9. 3D printing additive procedure model creation and dimensional check using CMM
10. A Comparative Study on Precision Metrology Systems For Additive Manufacturing
11. Systematic effect as a part of the coverage interval10.2478/v10178-010-0037-1 ↗
12. Influence of Fine Motor Skill on Accuracy of Measurements Using a Handheld Sliding Caliper at Adolescents Group Aged 19-20
13. Kacmarcik, J., Spahic, D., Varda, K., Porca, E., and Zaimovic-Uzunovic, N. (2018, January 4–6). An investigation of geometrical accuracy of desktop 3D printers using CMM. Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin, China.10.1088/1757-899X/393/1/012085 ↗
14. A Comparison of the CMM and Measuring Scanner for Printing Products Geometry Measurement10.1007/978-3-030-75275-0_34 ↗
15. Comparison of 3D scanning versus traditional methods of capturing foot and ankle morphology for the fabrication of orthoses: A systematic review10.1186/s13047-020-00442-8 ↗
16. 3D scanning as a highly precise, reproducible, and minimally invasive method for surface area and volume measurements of scleractinian corals10.1002/lom3.10109 ↗
17. Takeuchi, E., and Tsubouchi, T. (2006, January 9–13). A 3-D scan matching using improved 3-D normal distributions transform for mobile robotic mapping. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China.10.1109/IROS.2006.282246 ↗
18. D’Apuzzo, N. (2006, January 13–14). State of the art of the methods for static 3D scanning of partial or full human body. Proceedings of the Conference on 3D Modeling, Paris, France.
19. Ulas, C., and Temeltas, H. (September, January 28). A 3D scan matching method based on multi-layered Normal Distribution Transform. Proceedings of the IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), Milan, Italy.
20. Taylor, B.N., and Kuyatt, C.E. (1994). NIST Technical Note 1297, National Institute of Standards and Technology. [1994 ed.]. Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results.10.6028/NIST.TN.1297 ↗
21. Kim, N., Yang, C., Lee, H., and Aluru, N.R. (2019). Spatial uncertainty modeling for surface roughness of additively manufactured microstructures via image segmentation. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061093 ↗
22. Uncertainty quantification in dimensions dataset of additive manufactured NIST standard test artifact
23. (2023). Additive Manufacturing, Test artefacts, Geometric Capability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Systems (Standard No. ISO/ASTM 52902:2023).
24. (2021). Additive Manufacturing—General Principles—Fundamentals and Vocabulary (Standard No. ISO/ASTM 52900:2021).
25. The assessment of geometric accuracy of aircraft engine blades with the use of an optical coordinate scanner10.1108/AEAT-01-2015-0018 ↗
26. (2024, March 24). Technical Data Sheet. Available online: https://after-support.flashforge.jp/uploads/datasheet/tds/PLA_TDS_EN.pdf.
27. MakerBot Industries LLC (2022). User Manual for Makerbot Sketch, MakerBot Industries LLC.
28. (2023, December 12). Seam Position. Available online: https://help.prusa3d.com/article/seam-position_151069.
29. (2009). Geometrical product specifications (GPS), acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines (CMM), Part 2: CMMs used for measuring linear dimensions (Standard No. ISO 10360-2:2009).
30. Estimating the approximation uncertainty for digital materials subjected to stress relaxation tests10.1515/mms-2016-0048 ↗