Location-Specific Microstructure Characterization Within AM Bench 2022 Laser Tracks on Bare Nickel Alloy 718 Plates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Additive manufacturing of metal alloys produces microstructures that are typically very different from those produced by more traditional manufacturing approaches. Computer simulations are useful for connecting processing, structure, and performance for these materials, but validation data that span this full range is difficult to produce. This research is part of a broad effort by the Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Test Series to produce such datasets for laser powder bed fusion builds of nickel Alloy 718. Here, single laser tracks produced with variations in laser power, scan velocity, and laser diameter, and arrays of adjacent laser tracks on bare wrought Alloy 718 plates are examined using optical microscopy, electron backscatter diffraction, and energy dispersive spectroscopy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Turner J, Belak J et al (2022) ExaAM: metal additive manufacturing simulation at the fidelity of the microstructure. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 36(1):13–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342021104255810.1177/10943420211042558 ↗
2. Levine LE, Lane BM et al (2023) Outcomes and conclusions from the 2022 AM bench measurements challenge problems, modeling submissions, and conference. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:1–1510.1007/s40192-019-00164-1 ↗
3. Weaver JS, Deisenroth D, Mekhontsev S, Lane BM, Levine LE, Yeung H (2024) Cross-sectional melt pool geometry of laser scanned tracks and pads on nickel Alloy 718 for the 2022 additive manufacturing benchmark challenges. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-024-00355-510.1007/s40192-024-00355-5 ↗
4. Levine LE, Williams ME, Creuziger A, Stoudt MR, Young SA, Moon KW, Lane BM (2024) Location-specific microstructure characterization within AM Bench 2022 nickel Alloy 718 3D builds. Integr Mater Manuf Innov.10.1007/s40192-024-00361-7 ↗
5. Levine LE, Williams ME, Zhang F, Schwalbach E, Young SA, Stoudt MR, Creuziger A, Borkiewicz OJ, Ilavsky J (2022) AM Bench 2022 microstructure measurements for IN718 3D builds, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Accessed 2023-10-16. https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-269210.18434/mds2-2692 ↗
6. Weaver JS, Deisenroth D, Mekhontsev S, Lane BM, Levine LE, Yeung H (2022) AM Bench 2022 measurement results data: optical microscopy of laser-scanned single tracks and pads (AMB2022-03), National Institute of Standards and Technology. Accessed 2023-10-16. https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-271810.18434/mds2-2718 ↗
7. Levine LE, Williams ME, Stoudt MR, Young SA, Weaver JS, Deisenroth D, Lane BM (2023) AM Bench 2022: cross sectional microstructure of single laser tracks produced using different processing conditions and 2D arrays of laser tracks (pads) on solid plates of nickel Alloy 718, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Accessed 2023-11-29. https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-277510.18434/mds2-2775 ↗
8. Deisenroth D, Mekhontsev S, Lane BM, Weaver JS, Yeung H (2022) AM Bench 2022 measurement results data: in-situ thermography and scan strategy for laser-scanned single tracks and pads on bare In718 (AMB2022-03), National Institute of Standards and Technology. Accessed 2023-10-16. https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-271610.18434/mds2-2716 ↗
9. Deisenroth D, Weaver JS, Yeung H, Mekhontsev S, Lane BM, Levine LE (2023) Laser-scanned tracks and pads and in-situ thermography for the 2022 Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Challenges, for submission to IMMI.
10. Lane BM, Mekhontsev S et al (2016) Design, developments, and results from the NIST additive manufacturing metrology testbed (AMMT). In: proceedings of the 26th annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium, (Austin, TX), pp 1145–1160
11. VanderVoort GF (1999) Metallography principles and practice. ASM International, Materials Park
12. Heigel JC, Lane BM, Levine LE (2020) In situ measurements of melt-pool length and cooling rate during 3D builds of the metal AM-Bench artifacts. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:31–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-020-00170-810.1007/s40192-020-00170-8 ↗
13. Ricker RE, Heigel JC, Lane BM, Zhirnov I, Levine LE (2019) Topographic measurement of individual laser tracks in Alloy 625 bare plates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 8:521–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-019-00157-010.1007/s40192-019-00157-0 ↗
14. Anwar AB, Quang-Cuong P (2017) Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg: effects of scan direction, part placement and inert gas flow velocity on tensile strength. J Mater Process Technol 240:388–39610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.015 ↗
15. Deisenroth DC et al (2020) Effects of shield gas flow on melt pool variability and signature in scanned laser melting. International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 8425610.1115/MSEC2020-8410 ↗