FedDeep: A Federated Deep Learning Network for Edge Assisted Multi-Urban PM2.5 Forecasting
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate urban PM2.5 forecasting serves a crucial function in air pollution warning and human health monitoring. Recently, deep learning techniques have been widely employed for urban PM2.5 forecasting. Unfortunately, two problems exist: (1) Most techniques are focused on training and prediction on a central cloud. As the number of monitoring sites grows and the data explodes, handling a large amount of data on the central cloud can cause tremendous computational pressures and increase the risk of data leakages. (2) Existing methods lack an adaptive layer to capture the varying impacts of different external factors (e.g., weather conditions, temperature, and wind speed). In this paper, a federated deep learning network (FedDeep) is developed for edge-assisted multi-urban PM2.5 forecasting. First, we assign each urban region to an edge cloud server (ECS). An external spatio-temporal network (ESTNet) is then deployed on each ECS. Data from different urban regions are uploaded to the corresponding ECS for training, which avoids processing all the data on the central cloud and effectively alleviates computational pressure and data leakage issues. Second, in ESTNet, we develop a gating fusion layer to adaptively fuse external factors to improve prediction accuracy. Finally, we adopted PM2.5 data collected from air quality monitoring sites in 13 prefecture-level cities, Jiangsu Province for validation. The experimental results proved that FedDeep outperformed the advanced baselines in terms of prediction accuracy and model efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Computer and Software, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China
NARI Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210047, China
Shenzhen Urban Transport Planning Center Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Research on Distribution Room Condition Sensing Early Warning and Distribution Cable Operation and Inspection Smart Decision Making Technology
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, B., Rong, Y., Yong, R., Qin, D., Li, M., Zou, G., and Pan, J. (2022). Deep learning for air pollutant concentration prediction: A review. Atmos. Environ., 119347.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119347 ↗
2. Many-objective optimal power dispatch strategy incorporating temporal and spatial distribution control of multiple air pollutants10.1109/TII.2019.2896968 ↗
3. Urban air pollution monitoring system with forecasting models10.1109/JSEN.2016.2514378 ↗
4. A novel spatiotemporal convolutional long short-term neural network for air pollution prediction10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.086 ↗
5. Air-pollution prediction in smart city, deep learning approach10.1186/s40537-021-00548-1 ↗
6. Deep air quality forecasting using hybrid deep learning framework10.1109/TKDE.2019.2954510 ↗
7. Privacy-preserving deep learning via additively homomorphic encryption
8. Puthal, D., Sahoo, B.P., Mishra, S., and Swain, S. (2015, January 12–13). Cloud computing features, issues, and challenges: A big picture. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks, Odisha, India.10.1109/CINE.2015.31 ↗
9. Cloud security issues and challenges: A survey10.1016/j.jnca.2016.11.027 ↗
10. An ensemble long short-term memory neural network for hourly PM2.5 concentration forecasting10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.121 ↗
11. Identification of factors affecting air pollution by dust aerosol PM10 in Brno City, Czech Republic10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.017 ↗
12. Meteorological factors affecting particulate air pollution of a city10.1175/1520-0477-42.8.556 ↗
13. Xue, T., Zheng, Y., Geng, G., Zheng, B., Jiang, X., Zhang, Q., and He, K. (2017). Fusing observational, satellite remote sensing and air quality model simulated data to estimate spatiotemporal variations of PM2. 5 exposure in China. Remote Sens., 9.10.20944/preprints201702.0059.v1 ↗
14. Semi-supervised air quality forecasting via self-supervised hierarchical graph neural network10.1109/TKDE.2022.3149815 ↗
15. Air pollution concentration forecasting based on wavelet transform and combined weighting forecasting model10.1016/j.apr.2021.101144 ↗
16. Spatio-temporal fusion of meteorological factors for multi-site PM2. 5 prediction: A deep learning and time-variant graph approach10.1016/j.envres.2023.117286 ↗
17. Future edge cloud and edge computing for internet of things applications10.1109/JIOT.2017.2767608 ↗
18. Relevance analysis and short-term prediction of PM2. 5 concentrations in Beijing based on multi-source data10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.054 ↗
19. Ground-level ozone simulation using ensemble WRF/Chem predictions over the Southeast United States10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132428 ↗
20. Rekhi, J.K., Nagrath, P., and Jain, R. (2020). Advances in Data Sciences, Security and Applications: Proceedings of ICDSSA 2019, Springer.
21. Liu, H., Li, Q., Yu, D., and Gu, Y. (2019). Air quality index and air pollutant concentration prediction based on machine learning algorithms. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9194069 ↗
22. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
23. Long short-term memory-Fully connected (LSTM-FC) neural network for PM2. 5 concentration prediction10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.128 ↗
24. Using a deep convolutional neural network to predict 2017 ozone concentrations, 24 h in advance10.1016/j.neunet.2019.09.033 ↗
25. Correlational graph attention-based Long Short-Term Memory network for multivariate time series prediction10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107377 ↗
26. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA.
27. Nguyen, D.V., and Zettsu, K. (2021, January 15–18). Spatially-distributed federated learning of convolutional recurrent neural networks for air pollution prediction. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/BigData52589.2021.9671336 ↗
28. GPU-aided edge computing for processing the k nearest-neighbor query on SSD-resident data10.1016/j.iot.2021.100428 ↗
29. Recent advances on federated learning for cybersecurity and cybersecurity for federated learning for internet of things10.1109/JIOT.2022.3150363 ↗
30. Application of the XGBoost machine learning method in PM2. 5 prediction: A case study of Shanghai10.4209/aaqr.2019.08.0408 ↗
31. Lian, M., and Liu, J. (2022, January 6–8). Single Pollutant Prediction Approach by Fusing MLSTM and CNN. Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management, Singapore.10.1007/978-3-031-10989-8_11 ↗
32. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
33. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks
34. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and obesity in school-aged children and adolescents in Jiangsu province of China10.1016/j.envres.2021.110804 ↗
35. Development of a high-resolution emission inventory and its evaluation and application through air quality modeling for Jiangsu Province, China10.5194/acp-17-211-2017 ↗