Toward a Physical Basis for a Predictive Finite Element Thermal Model of the LENS™ Process Leveraging Dual-Wavelength Pyrometer Datasets
Source abstract
Abstract
Predicting the thermal history of a component produced via metal-based additive manufacturing is an important step of the part qualification process because the thermal history can be used to predict thermally induced residual stresses, distortion, and porosity. Thermal simulation calibration and validation are difficult due to the lack of insight into the melt pool during the build from traditional data used for calibration, such as thermocouple measurements and infrared camera images. This work presents a three-dimensional, finite element method, predictive thermal model of a Ti–6Al–4V thin wall manufactured via LENS™ that accounts for heat transfer due to conduction, convection, and radiation. Thermal melt pool data taken with a dual-wave pyrometer are used to calibrate and validate the model. Results from the calibration and validation studies indicate that process parameters (i.e., layer height and width) along with physical properties of the heat source and material can be used to inform the heat source modeling of powder-blown directed energy deposition finite element thermal models to generate datasets for modeling across multiple length scales in an integrated computational materials engineering framework.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM International (2010) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, pp 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1520/F2792-10.210.1520/F2792-10.2 ↗
2. Bian L, Thompson SM, Shamsaei N (2015) Mechanical properties and microstructural features of direct laser-deposited Ti-6Al-4V. JOM 67:629–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1308-910.1007/s11837-015-1308-9 ↗
3. Irwin J, Reutzel EW, Michaleris P, Keist J, Nassar AR (2016) Predicting microstructure from thermal history during additive manufacturing for Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Sci Eng 138:111007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403352510.1115/1.4033525 ↗
4. Phan TQ, Strantza M, Hill MR, Gnaupel-Herold TH, Heigel J, D’Elia CR, DeWald AT, Clausen B, Pagan DC, Peter Ko JY, Brown DW, Levine LE (2019) Elastic residual strain and stress measurements and corresponding part deflections of 3D additive manufacturing builds of IN625 AM-bench artifacts using neutron diffraction, synchrotron X-ray diffraction, and contour method. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 8:318–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-019-00149-010.1007/s40192-019-00149-0 ↗
5. Rubenchik AM, King WE, Wu S (2018) Scaling laws for the additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.03410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.034 ↗
6. Zheng B, Zhou Y, Smugeresky JE, Schoenung JM, Lavernia EJ (2008) Thermal behavior and microstructural evolution during laser deposition with laser-engineered net shaping: Part I. Numerical calculations. Metall Mater Trans A 39:2228–2236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-008-9557-710.1007/s11661-008-9557-7 ↗
7. Foteinopoulos P, Papacharalampopoulos A, Stavropoulos P (2017) On thermal modeling of additive manufacturing processes. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2017.09.00710.1016/j.cirpj.2017.09.007 ↗
8. Irwin J, Michaleris P (2016) A line heat input model for additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 138:111004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403366210.1115/1.4033662 ↗
9. Mahmoudi M, Tapia G, Karayagiz K, Franco B, Ma J, Arróyave R, Karaman I, Elwany A (2018) Multivariate calibration and experimental validation of a 3D finite element thermal model for laser powder-bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 7:116–13510.1007/s40192-018-0113-z ↗
10. Raghavan N, Babu SS, Dehoff R, Pannala S, Simunovic S, Kirka M, Turner J, Carlson N (2017) Numerical modeling of heat-transfer and the influence of process parameters on tailoring the grain morphology of IN718 in electron beam additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 112:303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.06710.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.067 ↗
11. Smith J, Xiong W, Yan W, Lin S, Cheng P, Kafka OL, Wagner GJ, Cao J, Liu WK (2016) Linking process, structure, property, and performance for metal-based additive manufacturing: computational approaches with experimental support. Comput Mech 57:583–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1240-410.1007/s00466-015-1240-4 ↗
12. Megahed M, Mindt H-W, N’Dri N, Duan H, Desmaison O (2016) Metal additive-manufacturing process and residual stress modeling. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-016-0047-210.1186/s40192-016-0047-2 ↗
13. Cooke S, Ahmadi K, Willerth S, Herring R (2020) Metal additive manufacturing: technology, metallurgy and modelling. J Manuf Process 57:978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.02510.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.025 ↗
14. Akram J, Chalavadi P, Pal D, Stucker B (2018) Understanding grain evolution in additive manufacturing through modeling. Addit Manuf 21:255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.02110.1016/j.addma.2018.03.021 ↗
15. Zinovieva O, Zinoviev A, Ploshikhin V (2018) Three-dimensional modeling of the microstructure evolution during metal additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci 141:207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.01810.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.018 ↗
16. Rodgers TM, Bishop JE, Madison JD (2018) Direct numerical simulation of mechanical response in synthetic additively manufactured microstructures. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 26:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/aac61610.1088/1361-651X/aac616 ↗
17. Rodgers TM, Madison JD, Tikare V (2017) Simulation of metal additive manufacturing microstructures using kinetic Monte Carlo. Comput Mater Sci 135:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.05310.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.053 ↗
18. Lu LX, Sridhar N, Zhang YW (2018) Phase field simulation of powder bed-based additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 144:801–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.03310.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.033 ↗
19. Sahoo S, Chou K (2016) Phase-field simulation of microstructure evolution of Ti–6Al–4V in electron beam additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf 9:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.12.00510.1016/j.addma.2015.12.005 ↗
20. Johnson KL, Rodgers TM, Underwood OD, Madison JD, Ford KR, Whetten SR, Dagel DJ, Bishop JE (2018) Simulation and experimental comparison of the thermo-mechanical history and 3D microstructure evolution of 304L stainless steel tubes manufactured using LENS. Comput Mech 61:559–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1516-y10.1007/s00466-017-1516-y ↗
21. Patra A, Priddy MW, McDowell DL (2015) Modeling the effects of microstructure on the tensile properties and micro-fracture behavior of Mo–Si–B alloys at elevated temperatures. Intermetallics 64:6–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2015.04.00810.1016/j.intermet.2015.04.008 ↗
22. Lloyd JT, Matejunas AJ, Becker R, Walter TR, Priddy MW, Kimberley J (2019) Dynamic tensile failure of rolled magnesium: simulations and experiments quantifying the role of texture and second-phase particles. Int J Plast 114:174–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.11.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2018.11.002 ↗
23. Priddy MW, Paulson NH, Kalidindi SR, McDowell DL (2017) Strategies for rapid parametric assessment of microstructure-sensitive fatigue for HCP polycrystals. Int J Fatigue 104:231–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.07.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.07.015 ↗
24. Paulson NH, Priddy MW, McDowell DL, Kalidindi SR (2019) Reduced-order microstructure-sensitive protocols to rank-order the transition fatigue resistance of polycrystalline microstructures. Int J Fatigue 119:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.011 ↗
25. Popova E, Rodgers TM, Gong X, Cecen A, Madison JD, Kalidindi SR (2017) Process-structure linkages using a data science approach: application to simulated additive manufacturing data. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6:54–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0088-110.1007/s40192-017-0088-1 ↗
26. Brindley KA, Priddy MW, Neu RW (2019) Integrative materials design of three-phase Mo-Si-B alloys. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 8:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-019-0124-410.1007/s40192-019-0124-4 ↗
27. Kern PC, Priddy MW, Ellis BD, McDowell DL (2017) pyDEM: a generalized implementation of the inductive design exploration method. Mater Des 134:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.04210.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.042 ↗
28. Hashemi SM, Parvizi S, Baghbanijavid H, Alvin T, Tan L, Nematollahi M, Ramazani A, Fang NX (2021) Computational modelling of process–structure–property–performance relationships in metal additive manufacturing : a review. Int Mater Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2020.186888910.1080/09506608.2020.1868889 ↗
29. Lampa C, Kaplan AFH, Powell J, Magnusson C (1999) An analytical thermodynamic model of laser welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 30:1293–1299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/30/9/00410.1088/0022-3727/30/9/004 ↗
30. Kazemi K, Goldak JA (2009) Numerical simulation of laser full penetration welding. Comput Mater Sci 44:841–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.01.00210.1016/j.commatsci.2008.01.002 ↗
31. Steuben JC, Iliopoulos AP, Michopoulos JG (2016) Discrete element modeling of particle-based additive manufacturing processes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 305:537–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.02310.1016/j.cma.2016.02.023 ↗
32. Lee WH, Zhang Y, Zhang J (2017) Discrete element modeling of powder flow and laser heating in direct metal laser sintering process. Powder Technol 315:300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.04.00210.1016/j.powtec.2017.04.002 ↗
33. McCallen CR (2012) ALE3D: Arbitrary Lagrange Eulerian three- and two dimensional modeling and simulation capability. Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory, Livermore
34. Khairallah SA, Anderson AT, Rubenchik A, King WE (2016) Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Mater 108:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.01410.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 ↗
35. Yan W, Ge W, Qian Y, Lin S, Zhou B, Liu WK, Lin F, Wagner GJ (2017) Multi-physics modeling of single/multiple-track defect mechanisms in electron beam selective melting. Acta Mater 134:324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.06110.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.061 ↗
36. Heigel JC, Michaleris P, Reutzel EW (2015) Thermo-mechanical model development and validation of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V. Addit Manuf 5:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.10.00310.1016/j.addma.2014.10.003 ↗
37. Marshall G, Young WJ, Shamsaei N, Craig J, Wakeman T, Thompson SM (2015) Dual thermographic monitoring of Ti-6AL-4V cylinders during direct laser deposition. In: Proceedings of the solid freeform fabrication, pp 259–272.
38. Dantin MJ, Furr WM, Priddy MW (2018) Towards an open-source, preprocessing framework for simulating material deposition for a directed energy deposition process. In: Proceedings of the solid freeform fabrication, pp 1903–1912
39. Huang Y, Khamesee MB, Toyserkani E (2019) A new physics-based model for laser directed energy deposition (powder-fed additive manufacturing): from single-track to multi-track and multi-layer. Opt Laser Technol 109:584–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.01510.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.015 ↗
40. Wang L, Felicelli SD, Craig JE (2009) Experimental and numerical study of the LENS rapid fabrication process. J Manuf Sci Eng 131:041019. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.317395210.1115/1.3173952 ↗
41. Marshall GJ, Young WJ, Thompson SM, Shamsaei N, Daniewicz SR, Shao S (2016) Understanding the microstructure formation of Ti-6Al-4V during direct laser deposition via in-situ thermal monitoring. JOM 68:778–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1767-z10.1007/s11837-015-1767-z ↗
42. Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A, Bian L, Thompson SM (2015) An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; Part II: mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control. Addit Manuf 8:12–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.00210.1016/j.addma.2015.07.002 ↗
43. Seifi SH, Tian W, Doude H, Tschopp MA, Bian L (2019) Layer-wise modeling and anomaly detection for laser-based additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 141:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404389810.1115/1.4043898 ↗
44. Khanzadeh M, Chowdhury S, Tschopp MA, Doude HR, Marufuzzaman M, Bian L (2019) In-situ monitoring of melt pool images for porosity prediction in directed energy deposition processes. IISE Trans 51:437–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2017.141765610.1080/24725854.2017.1417656 ↗
45. Yan W, Lin S, Kafka OL, Lian Y, Yu C, Liu Z, Yan J, Wolff S, Wu H, Ndip-Agbor E, Mozaffar M, Ehmann K, Cao J, Wagner GJ, Liu WK (2018) Data-driven multi-scale multi-physics models to derive process–structure–property relationships for additive manufacturing. Comput Mech 61:521–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1539-z10.1007/s00466-018-1539-z ↗
46. Hibbett, Karlsson, Sorensen (1998) ABAQUS/standard: user’s manual, vol 1
47. Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M (1984) A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metall Trans B 15:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0266733310.1007/BF02667333 ↗
48. Pinkerton AJ, Li L (2004) An analytical model of energy distribution in laser direct metal deposition. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 218:363–37410.1243/095440504323055498 ↗
49. Bramson M (1968) Infrared radiation: a handbook for applications. Plenum, New York10.1007/978-1-4757-0911-7 ↗
50. Boivineau M, Cagran C, Doytier D, Eyraud V, Nadal MH, Wilthan B, Pottlacher G (2006) Thermophysical properties of solid and liquid Ti-6Al-4V (TA6V) alloy. Int J Thermophys 27:507–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-005-0001-610.1007/s10765-005-0001-6 ↗
51. Denlinger ER, Heigel JC, Michaleris P (2015) Residual stress and distortion modeling of electron beam direct manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 229:1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440541453949410.1177/0954405414539494 ↗
52. Shen N, Chou K (2012) Thermal modeling of electron beam additive manufacturing process: powder sintering effects. In: ASME 2012 international manufacturing science and engineering conference, p 287. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2012-725310.1115/MSEC2012-7253 ↗
53. Chiumenti M, Lin X, Cervera M, Lei W, Zheng Y, Huang W (2017) Numerical simulation and experimental calibration of additive manufacturing by blown powder technology. Part I: Thermal analysis. Rapid Prototyp J 23:448–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2015-013610.1108/RPJ-10-2015-0136 ↗
54. Yang J, Sun S, Brandt M, Yan W (2010) Experimental investigation and 3D finite element prediction of the heat affected zone during laser assisted machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 210:2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.08.00710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.08.007 ↗
55. Denlinger ER, Michaleris P (2016) Effect of stress relaxation on distortion in additive manufacturing process modeling. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.01110.1016/j.addma.2016.06.011 ↗
56. Wang L, Felicelli S (2006) Analysis of thermal phenomena in LENS™ deposition. Mater Sci Eng A 435–436:625–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.08710.1016/j.msea.2006.07.087 ↗
57. Mills KC (2002) Recommended values of thermophysical properties for selected commercial alloys. Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge10.1533/9781845690144 ↗
58. Jelinek B, Young WJ, Dantin M, Furr W, Doude H (2020) Two-dimensional thermal finite element model of directed energy deposition: matching melt pool temperature profile with pyrometer measurement. J Manuf Process 57:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.02110.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.021 ↗
59. Marshall GJ, Thompson SM, Shamsaei N (2016) Data indicating temperature response of Ti–6Al–4V thin-walled structure during its additive manufacture via laser engineered net shaping. Data Brief 7:697–70310.1016/j.dib.2016.02.084 ↗
60. Lampa C, Kaplan AFH, Powell J, Magnusson C (1997) An analytical thermodynamic model of laser welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 30:1293–1299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/30/9/00410.1088/0022-3727/30/9/004 ↗
61. Kummailil J (2004) Process models for laser engineered net shaping. http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd-0429104-103828/
62. Dantin MJ (2022) Thermal_Model_Validation_LENS_Bi_Directional_Ti64_Thin_Wall. https://doi.org/10.17632/zvztvdgxpj.110.17632/zvztvdgxpj.1 ↗
63. Wolff SJ, Lin S, Faierson EJ, Liu WK, Wagner GL, Cao J (2017) A framework to link localized cooling and properties of directed energy deposition (DED)-Processed Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Mater 132:106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.02710.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.027 ↗
64. Gouge MF, Heigel JC, Michaleris P, Palmer TA (2015) Modeling forced convection in the thermal simulation of laser cladding processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:307–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6831-x10.1007/s00170-015-6831-x ↗
65. Hagqvist P, Sikström F, Christiansson AK (2013) Emissivity estimation for high temperature radiation pyrometry on Ti–6Al–4V. Meas J Int Meas Confed 46:871–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.10.01910.1016/j.measurement.2012.10.019 ↗
66. Li L, Yu K, Zhang K, Liu Y (2016) Study of Ti-6Al-4V alloy spectral emissivity characteristics during thermal oxidation process. Int J Heat Mass Transf 101:699–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.05.06910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.05.069 ↗
67. Laser Institute of America (2001) LIA handbook of laser materials processing, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg