Park Inclusive Design Index as a Systematic Evaluation Framework to Improve Inclusive Urban Park Uses: The Case of Hangzhou Urban Parks
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aims to optimize the evaluation system of inclusive design in urban parks, emphasizing the systemic nature of sensory, cognitive, and motor capacity support and exploring its role in park design practice. Based on the capability demand model, this study constructed indicators through literature collation and focus group discussion and assigned weights through hierarchical analysis to finally construct the Park Inclusive Design Index (PIDI). Then, the PIDI was utilized to assess the inclusive design performance of 48 urban parks in Hangzhou, China. The results of this study show that the overall inclusive design level of parks is relatively low (the average PIDI < 70), especially in the provision of cognitive support (cognitive-related indicator < 4). Meanwhile, comprehensive and specialized parks performed better in inclusive design compared to community parks and leisure parks. The level of inclusive design is moderatory correlated with the park renovation time and the park area, and strongly correlated with geographic location (scenic spot parks perform better; the parks in the old city perform worse). Ten indicators in the assessment scored below 2, which reveals the current status, shortcomings, and general problems with inclusive facilities in Hangzhou’s urban parks. This study integrated the needs and ability differences of people into the indicators, providing an assessment framework with broad applicability. Inclusive performance is a long-term process, and the implementation of the evaluation framework will provide a reference guide for the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of urban parks across China and even around the world.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urban Green Space and Health · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Urban Transport and Accessibility
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia
School of Culture Communication and Design, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics Dongfang College, Haining 314408, China
Centre for the Study of Built Environment in the Malay World (KALAM) and Institute for Smart Infrastructure and Innovative Construction (ISIIC), Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia
Funding
UTM Flagship COE/RG 1.2 · Guangdong Philosophy and Social Science Planning 2023 Youth Project
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Accessible nature beyond city limits—A scoping review10.1016/j.jort.2022.100490 ↗
2. Modeling the impacts of park access on health outcomes: A utility-based accessibility approach10.1177/2399808320974027 ↗
3. Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002 ↗
4. Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.003 ↗
5. Greener urbanization? Changing accessibility to parks in China10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.004 ↗
6. Equitable distribution of open space: Using spatial analysis to evaluate urban parks in Curitiba, Brazil10.1177/0265813515603369 ↗
7. Mahdzar, S.S.S. (2008). Sociability vs Accessibility Urban Street Life, University of London.
8. An assessment of urban park access in Shanghai–Implications for the social equity in urban China10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.007 ↗
9. A Brief Review of the English Literature on “Landscape Justice” 1998–2018
10. Study on the application of natural elements in urban parks’ children’s play spaces in China
11. Design for All in Scandinavia—A strong concept10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.004 ↗
12. Planning for environmental justice in an urban national park10.1080/09640560802703256 ↗
13. Universal Design practices of children’s playscape under the perspective of landscape justice
14. Defining landscape justice: The role of landscape in supporting wellbeing of migrants, a literature review10.1080/01426397.2017.1363880 ↗
15. Strategies and inequities in balancing recreation and COVID exposure when visiting green spaces10.1177/23998083221114645 ↗
16. Recent study and trend of usage condition of urban park analysis based on CiteSpace
17. Shoari, N., Ezzati, M., Baumgartner, J., Malacarne, D., and Fecht, D. (2020). Accessibility and allocation of public parks and gardens in England and Wales: A COVID-19 social distancing perspective. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1101/2020.05.11.20098269 ↗
18. A design model for service co-creation involving children
19. Ten questions concerning inclusive design of the built environment10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.008 ↗
20. The significance of Inclusive Design in public open space design and Building for the aging society
21. No “obstacles” in playgrounds that are not only accessible but also inclusive
22. Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation10.1007/s10209-007-0083-y ↗
23. Capability measurement for inclusive design10.1080/09544820903303464 ↗
24. “Separate but equal?” Understanding gender differences in urban park usage and its implications for gender-inclusive design10.3368/lj.40.1.1 ↗
25. A case for inclusive design: Analyzing the needs of those who frequent Taiwan’s urban parks10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.015 ↗
26. Research on the Influencing Factors of Users’ Perception of the Inclusiveness of Urban Parks Based on the Grounded Theory10.15302/J-LAF-1-020066 ↗
27. Boucherit, S., Maffei, L., Masullo, M., Berkouk, D., and Bouzir, T.A.K. (2023). Assessment of Sighted and Visually Impaired Users to the Physical and Perceptual Dimensions of an Oasis Settlement Urban Park. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15087014 ↗
28. Assessing the accessibility of youth friendly neighborhood parks: A case study in UEP Subang Jaya, Malaysia
29. Accessibility and usability of parks and playgrounds10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.08.011 ↗
30. Lee, Y.B., Chan, L.D., and Tang, M.X. (2013, January 2–3). Park seating furniture design in Hong Kong: A case study of inclusive design and its relation to user interaction. Proceedings of the Include Asia, Hong Kong, China.
31. History of Inclusive Design in the UK10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002 ↗
32. Patil, M.V., and Bambawale, A. (2022, January 3–4). Evaluation of Usability of Public Parks in Satara City (W.R.T. Inlusive Design), Dist-Satara, Maharashtra. Proceedings of the Virtual National Conference on Rural Architecture and regional planning, Pravara Rural College of Architecture, Loni, India.
33. Basnak, M., Tauke, B., and Weidemann, S. (2015, January 6–9). Universal design in architectural education: Who is doing it? How is it being done?. Proceedings of the ARCC 2015 Proceedings, Chicago, IL, USA.
34. Dong, H. (2019). Inclusive Design: The Chinese Archive, Tongji University Press.
35. Mahdzar, S.S.S., Phua, C.Y., and Chan, W. (2022, January 20–24). The impact of spatial accessibility on mobility of wheelchair users at Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Proceedings of the13th Space Syntax Symposium (van Nes A and Tan W), Bergen, Norway.
36. Moving beyond accessibility: The principles of universal (inclusive) design as a dimension in nD modelling of the built environment
37. Designing a more inclusive world10.5042/jic.2010.0375 ↗
38. Countering design exclusion: Bridging the gap between usability and accessibility10.1007/s10209-003-0059-5 ↗
39. Designing for our future selves: The Swedish experience10.1016/0003-6870(93)90155-3 ↗
40. A framework of persona based on the structural characteristics of older adults’ social network
41. (2016). Code for the Design of Public Park (Standard No. GB51192-2016).
42. (2016). Specification of Barrier-Free Facilities Setting in the Park (Standard No. DB11/T746-2010).
43. (2021). Tourism and Related Services (Standard No. ISO-21902-2021).
44. (2014). Barrierefreies Bauen–Planungsgrundlagen–Teil 3: Öffentlicher Verkehrs–und Freiraum (Standard No. DIN 18040-3).
45. Approved Document M (2015). Access to and Use of Buildings: Approved Document M, Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government in the United Kingdom.
46. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process10.1007/BF03191825 ↗
47. (2017). Standard for Classification of Urban Green Space (Standard No. CJJ85-2017).
48. Under the umbrella: Components of empathy in psychology and design10.1017/dsj.2022.13 ↗