journal article·2023-10-03Open access

Construction Risk Assessment of Yellow River Bridges Based on Combined Empowerment Method and Two-Dimensional Cloud Model

Lei Wang, Ruibao Jin, Jianpeng Zhou, Qingfu Li

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 19

Abstract

(1) In recent years, the economy of the Yellow River basin in China has developed rapidly, and a series of large bridges across the Yellow River have been built on both sides of the Yellow River, which has brought great convenience to regional socio-economic activities. However, risk events are prone to occur during the construction of bridges across the Yellow River, which affect the safety of the bridges’ structure. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a new scientific risk assessment system for the construction safety of bridges across the Yellow River. (2) Methods: Firstly, based on the construction safety risk assessment index system of bridges across the Yellow River, the cloud AHP method and the cloud entropy weight method are used to determine the subjective weight and objective weight of risk indexes, and then the game theory combination weighting method is used to determine the comprehensive weight of each risk index, and then the digital characteristic values of the risk probability cloud and the consequence cloud are calculated and input into the forward cloud generator algorithm. MATLAB was used to generate a two-dimensional comprehensive cloud map, which was visually compared with the standard cloud map, and the probability level and consequence level of each risk index were preliminarily obtained. Finally, the risk assessment matrix was used for comprehensive risk evaluation. (3) Results: Applying the method to the construction safety risk assessment of the Jiaoping Expressway, the overall construction safety risk level of the Yellow River bridge was determined as level 4, and the risk levels of the four primary indicators were: personnel risk (level 3), material and equipment risk (level 4), construction technology risk (level 5), and construction environment risk (level 4). (4) Conclusions: The results of the risk evaluation are consistent with the actual construction state of the bridge, which shows that game theory’s combination of empowerment with a two-dimensional cloud model is scientific and effective when applied to the construction safety risk evaluation of Yellow River bridges.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Decision-Making Techniques · Evaluation Methods in Various Fields · Research studies in Vietnam

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Henan Jiaotou Jiaozheng Expressway Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450016, China

School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Accelerated bridge construction in Washington State: From research to practice10.15554/pcij.09012012.34.49 ↗
2. Risk evaluation and prioritization in bridge construction projects using system dynamics approach10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000493 ↗
3. Health monitoring of closure joints in accelerated bridge construction: A review of non-destructive testing application10.3151/jact.17.381 ↗
4. Considerations on recent trends in, and future prospects of, steel bridge construction in Japan10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.016 ↗
5. A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.002 ↗
6. A fuzzy expert system for damage assessment using genetic algorithms and neural networks10.1111/j.1467-8667.1996.tb00307.x ↗
7. Curra, J., Omidvar, M., and Horine, B. (2019). Geo-Congress 2019: Soil Erosion, Underground Engineering, and Risk Assessment, American Society of Civil Engineers.
8. Risk assessment of bridge construction based on two-dimensional cloud model
9. Bridge risk assessment model based on game theory and fuzzy mathematics
10. Kim, J.M., Kim, T., and Ahn, S. (2020). Loss assessment for sustainable industrial infrastructure: Focusing on bridge construction and financial losses. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12135316 ↗
11. Monte Carlo simulation for arch bridge assessment10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00020-X ↗
12. Ahn, S., Kim, T., and Kim, J.M. (2020). Sustainable risk assessment through the analysis of financial losses from third-party damage in bridge construction. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12083435 ↗
13. Probabilistic risk assessment for the construction phases of a bridge construction based on finite element analysis10.1016/j.finel.2007.12.004 ↗
14. Hazards identification and risk assessment for UAV–assisted bridge inspections10.1080/15732479.2020.1858878 ↗
15. Agarwal, A., Sharma, V., and Shukla, V. (2018). Advances in Fire and Process Safety, Springer.
16. A new cognitive model: Cloud model10.1002/int.20340 ↗
17. Generic normal cloud model10.1016/j.ins.2014.04.051 ↗
18. A cloud model-based approach for water quality assessment10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.005 ↗
19. Condition assessment of suspension bridges using local variable weight and normal cloud model10.1007/s12205-018-1819-3 ↗
20. Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method10.1016/j.autcon.2008.03.005 ↗
21. An improved analytic hierarchy process based on cloud model scaling
22. Rashidi, M., Ghodrat, M., and Samali, B. (2017). Remedial modelling of steel bridges through application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7020168 ↗
23. Criteria analysis, weight and priority for handling bridges in Kudus District using AHP and Promethee II methods
24. Liu, H.B., Wang, X.R., Tan, G.J., and He, X. (2020). System reliability evaluation of a bridge structure based on multivariate copulas and the AHP–EW method that considers multiple failure criteria. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041399 ↗
25. Durability Evaluation of Concrete Bridges Based on the Theory of Matter Element Extension—Entropy Weight Method—Unascertained Measure10.1155/2021/2646723 ↗
26. Prediction of rock burst classification using cloud model with entropy weight10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64313-3 ↗
27. Li, Q.F., Zhou, J.P., and Feng, J.H. (2022). Safety Risk Assessment of Highway Bridge Construction Based on Cloud Entropy Power Method. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178692 ↗
28. Ranking via composite weighting schemes under a DEA cross-evaluation framework10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.022 ↗
29. A multidimension cloud model-based approach for water quality assessment10.1016/j.envres.2016.05.012 ↗
30. An evaluation approach of subjective trust based on cloud model10.1109/CSSE.2008.641 ↗
31. Analysis and improvements of cloud models for propagation studies10.1029/2008RS003876 ↗
32. Risk priority number for bridge failures10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000480 ↗
33. Use of unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry to obtain topographical information to improve bridge risk assessment10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000393 ↗
34. Risk assessment of bridges under multiple hazards in operation period10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.001 ↗