On the Fidelity of the Scaling Laws for Melt Pool Depth Analysis During Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
In additive manufacturing, the part quality is highly dependent on process parameters. The morphology of the melt pool (depth and width) is highly affected by process parameter selection. Available scaling laws more or less overestimate or underestimate melt pool dimensions with the similar order of magnitudes in the errors. Depending on melt pool mode, either conduction or keyhole, and moving from one material to another, scaling laws might not perform well. To further analyze the performance of the available scaling laws, in this work, melt pool depth obtained from experiments is tested against three well-known scaling laws. The fidelity and error associated with the scaling laws are analyzed and discussed. To improve the accuracy of the prediction, we revised three scaling laws and the results are discussed. While in some cases the scaling laws might have reasonable errors roughly lower than 50%, in other cases, errors are very high signifying missing physics from the predictions. The revised version of the scaling laws improves the fidelity of the predictions. The analysis shows a careful attention is required when using scaling laws to avoid high percentage of error.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Bourell D, Coholich J, Chalancon A, Bhat A (2017) Evaluation of energy density measures and validation for powder bed fusion of polyamide. CIRP Ann 66(1):217–22010.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.128 ↗
2. Mukherjee T, Manvatkar V, De A, DebRoy T (2017) Dimensionless numbers in additive manufacturing. J Appl Phys 121(6):06490410.1063/1.4976006 ↗
3. Wang L, Wei QS, Shi YS, Liu JH, He WT (2011) Experimental investigation into the single-track of selective laser melting of IN625. In: Advanced materials research, vol 233, pp 2844–2848. Trans Tech Publ10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.233-235.2844 ↗
4. Ciurana J, Hernandez L, Delgado J (2013) Energy density analysis on single tracks formed by selective laser melting with CoCrMo powder material. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(5):1103–111010.1007/s00170-013-4902-4 ↗
5. Yadroitsev I, Yadroitsava I, Bertrand P, Smurov I (2012) Factor analysis of selective laser melting process parameters and geometrical characteristics of synthesized single tracks. Rapid Prototyping J10.1108/13552541211218117 ↗
6. Bertoli US, Wolfer AJ, Matthews MJ, Delplanque J-PR, Schoenung JM (2017) On the limitations of volumetric energy density as a design parameter for selective laser melting. Mater Des 113:331–34010.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.037 ↗
7. Weaver JS, Heigel JC, Lane BM (2022) Laser spot size and scaling laws for laser beam additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process 73:26–3910.1016/j.jmapro.2021.10.053 ↗
8. Hann DB, Iammi J, Folkes J (2011) A simple methodology for predicting laser-weld properties from material and laser parameters. J Phys D Appl Phys 44(44):44540110.1088/0022-3727/44/44/445401 ↗
9. King WE, Barth HD, Castillo VM, Gallegos GF, Gibbs JW, Hahn DE, Kamath C, Rubenchik AM (2014) Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 214(12):2915–292510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005 ↗
10. Hanemann T, Seyfert C, Holfelder P, Rota A, Heilmaier M (2020) Dimensionless enthalpy as characteristic factor for process control in laser powder bed fusion. J Laser Micro Nanoeng 15(3):257–266
11. Rubenchik AM, King WE, Wu SS (2018) Scaling laws for the additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 257:234–24310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.034 ↗
12. Fabbro R (2019) Scaling laws for the laser welding process in keyhole mode. J Mater Process Technol 264:346–35110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.09.027 ↗
13. Ye J, Khairallah SA, Rubenchik AM, Crumb MF, Guss G, Belak J, Matthews MJ (2019) Energy coupling mechanisms and scaling behavior associated with laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Adv Eng Mater 21(7):190018510.1002/adem.201900185 ↗
14. Eagar TW, Tsai NS et al (1983) Temperature fields produced by traveling distributed heat sources. Weld J 62(12):346–355
15. Buckingham E (1914) On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Phys Rev 4(4):34510.1103/PhysRev.4.345 ↗
16. Grossmann A, Felger J, Froelich T, Gosmann J, Mittelstedt C (2019) Melt pool controlled laser powder bed fusion for customised low-density lattice structures. Mater Des 181:10805410.1016/j.matdes.2019.108054 ↗
17. Großmann A, Mölleney J, Frölich T, Merschroth H, Felger J, Weigold M, Sielaff A, Mittelstedt C (2020) Dimensionless process development for lattice structure design in laser powder bed fusion. Mater Des 194:10895210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108952 ↗
18. Yang Y, Großmann A, Kühn P, Mölleney J, Kropholler L, Mittelstedt C, Bai-Xiang X (2022) Validated dimensionless scaling law for melt pool width in laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Process Technol 299:11731610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117316 ↗
19. Gan Z, Kafka OL, Parab N, Zhao C, Fang L, Heinonen O, Sun T, Liu WK (2021) Universal scaling laws of keyhole stability and porosity in 3D printing of metals. Nat Commun 12(1):1–810.1038/s41467-021-22704-0 ↗
20. Coen V, Goossens L, Van Hooreweder B (2022) Methodology and experimental validation of analytical melt pool models for laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Process Technol, p 11754710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117547 ↗
21. Simonds BJ, Tanner J, Artusio-Glimpse A, Williams PA, Parab N, Zhao C, Sun T (2021) The causal relationship between melt pool geometry and energy absorption measured in real time during laser-based manufacturing. Appl Mater Today 23:10104910.1016/j.apmt.2021.101049 ↗
22. Wang Z, Liu M (2019) Dimensionless analysis on selective laser melting to predict porosity and track morphology. J Mater Process Technol 273:11623810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.05.019 ↗
23. Goossens LR, Van Hooreweder B (2021) A virtual sensing approach for monitoring melt-pool dimensions using high speed coaxial imaging during laser powder bed fusion of metals. Addit Manuf 40:101923
24. Liu B, Fang G, Lei L (2021) An analytical model for rapid predicting molten pool geometry of selective laser melting (SLM). Appl Math Model 92:505–52410.1016/j.apm.2020.11.027 ↗
25. Rankouhi B, Agrawal AK, Pfefferkorn FE, Thoma DJ (2021) A dimensionless number for predicting universal processing parameter boundaries in metal powder bed additive manufacturing. Manuf Lett 27:13–1710.1016/j.mfglet.2020.12.002 ↗
26. Agrawal AK, Rankouhi B, Thoma DJ (2022) Predictive process mapping for laser powder bed fusion: a review of existing analytical solutions. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 26(6):10102410.1016/j.cossms.2022.101024 ↗
27. Rai R, Elmer JW, Palmer TA, DebRoy T (2007) Heat transfer and fluid flow during keyhole mode laser welding of tantalum, Ti–6Al–4V, 304L stainless steel and vanadium. J Phys D Appl Phys 40(18):575310.1088/0022-3727/40/18/037 ↗
28. Trapp J, Rubenchik AM, Guss G, Matthews MJ (2017) In situ absorptivity measurements of metallic powders during laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. Appl Mater Today 9:341–34910.1016/j.apmt.2017.08.006 ↗
29. Simonds BJ, Sowards J, Hadler J, Pfeif E, Wilthan B, Tanner J, Harris C, Williams P, Lehman J (2018) Time-resolved absorptance and melt pool dynamics during intense laser irradiation of a metal. Phys Rev Appl 10(4):04406110.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.044061 ↗
30. Deisenroth DC, Mekhontsev S, Lane B (2020) Measurement of mass loss, absorbed energy, and time-resolved reflected power for laser powder bed fusion. 11271:112710L10.1117/12.2547491 ↗
31. Lane B, Mekhontsev S, Grantham S, Vlasea ML, Whiting J, Yeung H, Fox J, Zarobila C, Neira J, McGlauflin M (2016) Design, developments, and results from the NIST additive manufacturing metrology testbed (AMMT). In: 2016 International solid freeform fabrication symposium. University of Texas at Austin
32. Lane B, Heigel J, Ricker R, Zhirnov I, Khromschenko V, Weaver J, Phan T, Stoudt M, Mekhontsev S, Levine L (2020) Measurements of melt pool geometry and cooling rates of individual laser traces on IN625 bare plates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9(1):16–3010.1007/s40192-020-00169-1 ↗
33. Shrestha S, Chou K (2021) A study of transient and steady-state regions from single-track deposition in laser powder bed fusion. J Manuf Process 61:226–23510.1016/j.jmapro.2020.11.023 ↗