journal article·2023-08-11Open access

Fragility Analysis of Transmission Towers Subjected to Downburst Winds

Chao Zhu, Qingshan Yang, Dahai Wang, Guoqing Huang, Shuguo Liang

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 16

Abstract

A downburst is a typical local highly intensive wind all over the world, which is attributed to be the main cause of wind damage to transmission lines in inland areas worldwide. The collapse accidents of transmission towers under the downburst still occur every year. Therefore, it is of great significance to assess the safety of the transmission towers under downbursts. The motivation of the present study is to propose a fragility assessment method for transmission towers under the action of a downburst considering the uncertainty of wind-resistance capacity and the stochastic wind load effect. First, the downburst wind field of the transmission tower with different wind attack angles and different radial distances is simulated according to the mixed stochastic model. Then, random material characteristic samples are generated by the Latin hypercube sampling technique and applied to establish uncertain finite element models for transmission towers. Next, the static nonlinear buckling analysis is carried out by numerical methods to determine the ultimate capacity under the downburst wind load. The parameter analysis of different wind attack angles and radial distances between the downburst and the tower is conducted to determine the most unfavorable location of the maximum response. The failure mode of the transmission tower and the probabilities of the initial failure main members are summarized. Finally, the fragility curves of the transmission tower under the downburst and the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) wind are compared. The results show that the maximum response is located at R = 1.6D. Most of the initial buckling members are located close to the first section of the tower. The fragility curves of the tower under the downburst are more dangerous than the ABL wind with the attack angle increasing from 0° to 90°. Furthermore, considering the probability model of intensity and direction of the downburst and based on the previous fragility analysis, the collapse probability of the transmission tower caused by the downburst is obtained. By probability analysis of the parameters, including layout conditions, different directions, and different wind speeds, it is found that the most favorable arrangement is 157.5°, and the most unfavorable arrangement is 112.5°.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wind and Air Flow Studies · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

School of Civil and Building Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · 111 Project

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Fujita, T.T. (Smrp, 1978). Manual of downburst identification for project NIMROD, Smrp.
2. Downbursts: Meteorological features and wind field characteristics10.1016/0167-6105(90)90294-M ↗
3. Thunderstorms—Their importance in wind engineering—A case for the next generation wind tunnel10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00262-3 ↗
4. Experimental measurement and numerical simulation of an impinging jet with application to thunderstorm microburst winds10.1016/j.jweia.2007.09.001 ↗
5. Failure Characteristics of Transmission Towers Subjected to Downbursts
6. Winds wreak havoc on lines
7. Investigation on tower collapses of 500kV Renshang 5237 transmission line caused by a downburst
8. Wind-induced dynamic response of high-rise transmission tower under downburst wind load
9. Downburst’s characteristics and its effect on wind-induced collapse of transmission tower
10. Fragility analysis of transmission line subjected to wind loading10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001311 ↗
11. Fragility modelling framework for transmission line towers under winds10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.096 ↗
12. Fragility analysis of a transmission tower under combined wind and rain loads10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104098 ↗
13. Fragility analysis of a long-span transmission tower–line system under wind loads10.1177/1369433220903983 ↗
14. Component-based fragility analysis of transmission towers subjected to hurricane wind load10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112586 ↗
15. Assessment of wind-induced fragility of transmission towers under quasi-static wind load
16. A moment-matching method for fragility analysis of transmission towers under straight line winds10.1016/j.ress.2023.109241 ↗
17. Modelling of tornado and microburst-induced wind loading and failure of a lattice transmission tower10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00045-6 ↗
18. Design of an experimental arrangement to study the wind loads on transmission towers due to downbursts
19. A deterministic–stochastic hybrid model of downbursts and its impact on a cantilevered structure10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.12.009 ↗
20. Chay, M.T., Albermani, F.G., and Hawes, H. (2006). First World Congress on Asset Management, IEEE.
21. Behaviour of guyed transmission line structures under downburst wind loading10.12989/was.2007.10.3.249 ↗
22. Aboshosha, H., and El Damatty, A.A. (December, January 28). Capacity of electrical transmission towers under downburst loading. Proceedings of the First Australasia and South-East Asia Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, Perth, Australia.
23. Nonlinear inelastic responses of transmission tower-line system under downburst wind10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.047 ↗
24. Multi-scale failure analysis of transmission towers under downburst loading10.1142/S0219455418500293 ↗
25. Progressive collapse analysis of a truss transmission tower-line system subjected to downburst loading10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.107044 ↗
26. Capacity of a transmission tower under downburst wind loading10.12989/was.2016.22.1.065 ↗
27. Critical load cases for lattice transmission line structures subjected to downbursts: Economic implications for design of transmission lines10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.043 ↗
28. Aero-elastic response of transmission line system subjected to downburst wind: Validation of numerical model using experimental data
29. The Dynamic Effect of Downburst Winds on the Longitudinal Forces Applied to Transmission Towers10.3389/fbuil.2019.00059 ↗
30. Fang, Z., Wang, Z., Zhu, R., and Huang, H. (2022). Study on wind-induced response of transmission tower-line system under downburst wind. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12070891 ↗
31. Zhong, Y., Li, S., Yan, Z., Liu, X., Luo, J., and Jin, W. (2022). Study on Stability of Transmission Tower-Line System under a Downburst. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12091338 ↗
32. Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structural systems under uncertainty10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001544 ↗
33. Uncertainty analysis of the strength capacity and failure path for a transmission tower under a wind load10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.009 ↗
34. An empirical model of a downburst10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00058-9 ↗
35. Oseguera, R.M., and Bowles, R.L. (1988). A Simple, Analytic 3-Dimensional Downburst Model Based on Boundary Layer Stagnation Flow, NASA Technical Memorandum No. 100632.
36. Physical and numerical modelling of thunderstorm downbursts10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00090-8 ↗
37. Assessment of microburst models for downdraft estimation10.2514/3.46282 ↗
38. Simulation of non-stationary fluctuating wind velocity in downburst
39. Simulation of multi-dimensional Gaussian stochastic fields by spectral representation10.1115/1.3101883 ↗
40. Simulation of multivariate nonstationary random processes: Hybrid stochastic wave and proper orthogonal decomposition approach10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001273 ↗
41. (2012). Technical Code for the Design of Tower and Pole Structures of Overhead Transmission Lines, China Planning Press. DL/T5154-2012.
42. Dynamic response of transmission line conductors under downburst and synoptic winds10.12989/was.2015.21.2.241 ↗
43. Failure Analysis of a Transmission Tower Subjected to Wind Load Using Uncertainty Method
44. Huang, B.C., and Wang, C.J. (2008). The Wind Resistance Analysis Principle and Application in Structures, Tongji University Press. (In Chinese).
45. Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation10.1115/1.3119501 ↗
46. Wind velocity field simulation based on enhanced closed-form solution of Cholesky decomposition10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001712 ↗
47. Experimental and numerical study on the responses of a transmission tower to skew incident winds10.1016/j.jweia.2016.05.010 ↗
48. Design wind loads for tubular-angle steel cross-arms of transmission towers under skewed wind loading10.1016/j.jweia.2015.01.012 ↗
49. Wind tunnel tests on wind loads acting on an angled steel triangular transmission tower10.1016/j.jweia.2016.07.016 ↗
50. A risk model for design of transmission line systems against thunderstorm down burst winds10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00057-7 ↗