Experimenting with Extreme Learning Machine for Biomedical Image Classification
Source abstract
Abstract
Currently, deep learning networks, with particular regard to convolutional neural network models, are typically exploited for biomedical image classification. One of the disadvantages of deep learning is that is extremely expensive to train due to complex data models. Extreme learning machine has recently emerged which, as shown in experimental studies, can produce an acceptable predictive performance in several classification tasks, and at a much lower training cost compared to deep learning networks that are trained by backpropagation. We propose a method devoted to exploring the possibility of considering extreme learning machines for biomedical classification tasks. Binary and multiclass classification in four case studies are considered to demonstrate the effectiveness of extreme learning machine, considering the biomedical images acquired with the dermatoscope and with the blood cell microscope, showing that the extreme learning machine can be successfully applied for biomedical image classification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning and ELM · Extracellular vesicles in disease · Neural Networks and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “Vincenzo Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
Institute for Informatics and Telematics, National Research Council of Italy, 56121 Pisa, Italy
Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy
Funding
MUR - REASONING · National Plan for NRRP Complementary Investments D^3 4 Health · e-DAI
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Learning representations by back-propagating errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
2. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm10.1109/72.329697 ↗
3. Orthogonal Least Squares Learning Algorithm for Radial10.1109/72.80341 ↗
4. Urgen Branke, J. (1995, January 9–12). Evolutionary algorithms for neural network design and training. Proceedings of the 1st Nordic Workshop on Genetic Algorithms and its Applictions, Vaasa, Finland.
5. Trends in extreme learning machines: A review10.1016/j.neunet.2014.10.001 ↗
6. Convex incremental extreme learning machine10.1016/j.neucom.2007.02.009 ↗
7. Universal approximation using incremental constructive feedforward networks with random hidden nodes10.1109/TNN.2006.875977 ↗
8. Is extreme learning machine feasible? A theoretical assessment (Part I)10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2335212 ↗
9. Is extreme learning machine feasible? A theoretical assessment (Part II)10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2336665 ↗
10. Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification10.1109/TSMCB.2011.2168604 ↗
11. Support vector machine10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
12. Least squares support vector machine classifiers10.1023/A:1018628609742 ↗
13. Direct Kernel Perceptron (DKP): Ultra-fast kernel ELM-based classification with non-iterative closed-form weight calculation10.1016/j.neunet.2013.11.002 ↗
14. Semi-supervised and unsupervised extreme learning machines10.1109/TCYB.2014.2307349 ↗
15. An insight into extreme learning machines: Random neurons, random features and kernels10.1007/s12559-014-9255-2 ↗
16. Orthogonal least squares algorithm for training cascade neural networks10.1109/TCSI.2012.2189060 ↗
17. Biomedical image classification using deep convolutional neural networks–overview10.1088/1757-899X/1022/1/012020 ↗
18. A survey on artificial intelligence approaches for medical image classification10.17485/ijst/2011/v4i11.35 ↗
19. Artificial neural network based screening of cervical cancer using a hierarchical modular neural network architecture (HMNNA) and novel benchmark uterine cervix cancer database10.1007/s00521-017-3246-7 ↗
20. Diagnosing uterine cervical cancer on a single T2-weighted image: Comparison between deep learning versus radiologists10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109471 ↗
21. Classification using deep learning neural networks for brain tumors10.1016/j.fcij.2017.12.001 ↗
22. Afshar, P., Mohammadi, A., and Plataniotis, K.N. (2018, January 7–10). Brain tumor type classification via capsule networks. Proceedings of the 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Athens, Greece.10.1109/ICIP.2018.8451379 ↗
23. A new rectangular window based image cropping method for generalization of brain neoplasm classification systems10.1002/ima.22266 ↗
24. Convolutional neural networks and extreme learning machines for malware classification10.1007/s11416-020-00354-y ↗
25. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
26. Pathological brain detection based on AlexNet and transfer learning10.1016/j.jocs.2018.11.008 ↗
27. Cross-wavelet assisted convolution neural network (AlexNet) approach for phonocardiogram signals classification10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102142 ↗
28. Kumar, A.M., and Chakrapani, A. (2022). Classification of ECG signal using FFT based improved Alexnet classifier. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0274225 ↗
29. Extreme learning machine (elm)-based classification of benign and malignant cells in breast cancer
30. E-DiCoNet: Extreme learning machine based classifier for diagnosis of COVID-19 using deep convolutional network10.1007/s12652-020-02688-3 ↗
31. Pavlov, S., Vassilenko, V., Saldan, I., Vovkotrub, D., Poplavskaya, A., and Kuzin, O. (September, January 24). Methods of processing biomedical image of retinal macular region of the eye. Proceedings of the Reflection, Scattering, and Diffraction from Surfaces V, Online.
32. Kapoor, L., and Thakur, S. (2017, January 12–13). A survey on brain tumor detection using image processing techniques. Proceedings of the 2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering-Confluence, Noida, India.10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2017.7943218 ↗
33. Biomedical image processing10.1109/MC.1983.1654163 ↗
34. Kaucha, D.P., Prasad, P., Alsadoon, A., Elchouemi, A., and Sreedharan, S. (2017, January 21–22). Early detection of lung cancer using SVM classifier in biomedical image processing. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering (ICPCSI), Chennai, India.10.1109/ICPCSI.2017.8392305 ↗
35. Learning, M. (1997). Tom Mitchell, McGraw Hill.
36. Singh, P., Manure, A., Singh, P., and Manure, A. (2023, July 20). Introduction to tensorflow 2.0. In Learn TensorFlow 2.0: Implement Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models with Python; 2020; pp. 1–24. Available online: https://books.google.com.hk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3_rEDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Learn+TensorFlow+2.0:+Implement+Machine+Learning+and+Deep+++Learning+Models+with+Python&ots=iac1aMg5mX&sig=C1uvgYzaOVuCQWH2DzGnMIHhGK8&redir_esc=y.10.1007/978-1-4842-5558-2_1 ↗
37. Yang, J., Shi, R., and Ni, B. (2021, January 13–16). Medmnist classification decathlon: A lightweight automl benchmark for medical image analysis. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Nice, France.10.1109/ISBI48211.2021.9434062 ↗
38. The HAM10000 dataset, a large collection of multi-source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions10.1038/sdata.2018.161 ↗
39. Codella, N., Rotemberg, V., Tschandl, P., Celebi, M.E., Dusza, S., Gutman, D., Helba, B., Kalloo, A., Liopyris, K., and Marchetti, M. (2019). Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection 2018: A challenge hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (isic). arXiv.
40. A dataset of microscopic peripheral blood cell images for development of automatic recognition systems10.1016/j.dib.2020.105474 ↗