Irrigation Scheduling in Processing Tomato to Save Water: A Smart Approach Combining Plant and Soil Monitoring
Source abstract
Abstract
The gradual reduction of water reserves for irrigation has become a worldwide concern. To improve the irrigation of processing tomato, we conducted a study to evaluate a system that monitors both plant water status and soil moisture levels (PlaSoMan) compared to an evapotraspirometric method (IrriMan) and an empirical farmer’s management (FarMan) in a two-year field trial. The results showed that PlaSoMan saved around 30% and 7.5% of water, with a yield loss of only 10% and 2.5% compared to FarMan and IrriMan, respectively. Thus, PlaSoMan showed satisfactory irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) over the two years. Moreover, IrriMan and PlaSoMan had lower blue water requirement (BWR) values than FarMan. Finally, PlaSoMan reached the highest value of the yield quality indicator, which combined total yield and brix degree. Thus, the new system, which assesses both plant water status and soil moisture levels, appears to be associated with high-quality and water-friendly tomato production representing an efficient solution for areas with limited water resources.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Irrigation Practices and Water Management · Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics · Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
Funding
Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies (MiPAAF)
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. (2023, May 22). World Processing Tomato Council (WPTC). Available online: https://www.wptc.to/.
2. Nemeskéri, E., Neményi, A., Bocs, A., Pék, Z., and Helyes, L. (2019). Physiological Factors and their Relationship with the Productivity of Processing Tomato under Different Water Supplies. Water, 11.10.3390/w11030586 ↗
3. Laranjeira, T., Costa, A., Faria-Silva, C., Ribeiro, D., Ferreira de Oliveira, J.M.P., Simões, S., and Ascenso, A. (2022). Sustainable Valorization of Tomato By-Products to Obtain Bioactive Compounds: Their Potential in Inflammation and Cancer Management. Molecules, 27.10.3390/molecules27051701 ↗
4. Identifying the most promising agronomic adaptation strategies for the tomato growing systems in Southern Italy via simulation modeling10.1016/j.eja.2019.125937 ↗
5. Report FAO (2000). New Dimensions in Water Security—Water, Society and Ecosystem Services in the 21st Century, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Land and Water Development Division.
6. A decision support system for managing irrigation in agriculture10.1016/j.compag.2016.04.003 ↗
7. Chand, J., Hewa, G., Hassanli, A., and Myers, B. (2020). Evaluation of Deficit Irrigation and Water Quality on Production and Water Productivity of Tomato in Greenhouse. Agriculture, 10.10.3390/agriculture10070297 ↗
8. Regional assessment of green and blue water consumption for tomato cultivated in Southern Italy10.1017/S0021859617000831 ↗
9. Processing tomatoes under different irrigation regimes in Southern Italy: Agronomic and economic assessments in a simulation case study
10. Water saving strategies assessment on processing tomato cultivated in Mediterranean region
11. The water saving with Irriframe platform for thousands of Italian farms
12. Doorenbos, J., and Pruit, W.O. (1977). Crop Water Requirements, FAO. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24.
13. van Keulen, H., and Wolfm, J. (1986). Modelling of Agricultural Production: Weather, Soils and Crops, Pudoc. Available online: https://edepot.wur.nl/172091.
14. (2023, March 06). Available online: https://www.irriframe.it/Irriframe.
15. Measuring yield-reducing plant water potential depressions in wheat by infrared thermometry10.1007/BF00258374 ↗
16. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, FAO. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/x0490e/x0490e00.htm.
17. Giuliani, M.M., Nardella, E., Gagliardi, A., and Gatta, G. (2017). Deficit irrigation and partial root-zone drying techniques in processing tomato cultivated under Mediterranean conditions. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9122197 ↗
18. (1995). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. [16th ed.].
19. Francis, F.J., and Clydesdale, F.M. (1975). Food Colorimetry: Theory and Applications, AVI Publishing Co.
20. Processing tomato quality as affected by irrigation scheduling10.1016/j.scienta.2009.06.026 ↗
21. Effect of thermal processing on lycopene, beta-carotene and Vitamin C content of tomato [Var.UC82B]
22. An analysis of transformations10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x ↗
23. Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in Gagliardi dry areas10.1016/j.agwat.2009.04.009 ↗
24. Experimental testing of a model-based decision support system integrated with smart sensors to optimize irrigation strategies for processing tomato: A case study in southern Italy10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1311.62 ↗
25. LCIS DSS—An irrigation supporting system for water use efficiency improvement in precision agriculture: A maize case study10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102646 ↗
26. Evaluation of the influence of irrigation methods and water quality on sugar beet yield and water use efficiency10.1016/j.agwat.2009.10.010 ↗
27. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on the water-yield relationship and carotenoid production of processing tomatoes10.21273/HORTSCI13048-18 ↗
28. Water use efficiency of surface drip irrigation versus an alternative subsurface drip irrigation method10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000745 ↗
29. The water foot print of Tunisia from an economic perspective10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.015 ↗
30. Quantitative response of greenhouse tomato yield and quality to water deficit at different growth stages10.1016/j.agwat.2013.07.011 ↗