High-Throughput Microstructural Characterization and Process Correlation Using Automated Electron Backscatter Diffraction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The need to optimize the processing conditions of additively manufactured (AM) metals and alloys has driven advances in throughput capabilities for material property measurements such as tensile strength or hardness. High-throughput (HT) characterization of AM metal microstructure has fallen significantly behind the pace of property measurements due to intrinsic bottlenecks associated with the artisan and labor-intensive preparation methods required to produce highly polished surfaces. This inequality in data throughput has led to a reliance on heuristics to connect process to structure or structure to properties for AM structural materials. In this study, we show a transformative approach to achieve laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) printing, HT preparation using dry electropolishing and HT electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). This approach was used to construct a library of > 600 experimental EBSD sample sets spanning a diverse range of LPBF process conditions for AM Kovar. This vast library is far more expansive in parameter space than most state-of-the-art studies, yet it required only approximately 10 labor hours to acquire. Build geometries, surface preparation methods, and microscopy details, as well as the entire library of >600 EBSD data sets over the two sample design versions, have been shared with intent for the materials community to leverage the data and further advance the approach. Using this library, we investigated process–structure relationships and uncovered an unexpected, strong dependence of microstructure on location within the build, when varied, using otherwise identical laser parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. King WE, Anderson AT, Ferencz RM, Hodge NE, Kamath C, Khairallah SA, Rubenchik AM (2015) Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges. Appl Phys Rev 2(4):04130410.1063/1.4937809 ↗
2. Sing S, Yeong W (2020) Laser powder bed fusion for metal additive manufacturing: perspectives on recent developments. Virtual Phys Prototyp 15(3):359–37010.1080/17452759.2020.1779999 ↗
3. Ahmed N, Barsoum I, Haidemenopoulos G, Al-Rub RA (2022) Process parameter selection and optimization of laser powder bed fusion for 316L stainless steel: a review. J Manuf Process 75:415–43410.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.064 ↗
4. Aspuru-Guzik A, Persson K (2018) Materials acceleration platform: Accelerating advanced energy materials discovery by integrating high-throughput methods and artificial intelligence., Mission Innovation
5. Baturynska I, Semeniuta O, Martinsen K (2018) Optimization of process parameters for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing by combination of machine learning and finite element method: A conceptual framework. Proc Cirp 67:227–23210.1016/j.procir.2017.12.204 ↗
6. Sing S, Kuo C, Shih C, Ho C, Chua C (2021) Perspectives of using machine learning in laser powder bed fusion for metal additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 16(3):372–38610.1080/17452759.2021.1944229 ↗
7. Liu J, Ye J, Silva Izquierdo D, Vinel A, Shamsaei N, Shao S (2022) A review of machine learning techniques for process and performance optimization in laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 1–2710.1007/s10845-022-02012-0 ↗
8. Wang P, Yang Y, Moghaddam NS (2022) Process modeling in laser powder bed fusion towards defect detection and quality control via machine learning: the state-of-the-art and research challenges. J Manuf Process 73:961–98410.1016/j.jmapro.2021.11.037 ↗
9. Chua C, Liu Y, Williams RJ, Chua CK, Sing SL (2024) In-process and post-process strategies for part quality assessment in metal powder bed fusion: a review. J Manuf Syst 73:75–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.01.00410.1016/j.jmsy.2024.01.004 ↗
10. AbouelNour Y, Gupta N (2022) In-situ monitoring of sub-surface and internal defects in additive manufacturing: a review. Mater Des 222:111063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11106310.1016/j.matdes.2022.111063 ↗
11. Caltanissetta F, Grasso M, Petro S, Colosimo BM (2018) Characterization of in-situ measurements based on layerwise imaging in laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 24:183–199
12. Weaver JS, Pintar AL, Beauchamp C, Joress H, Moon K-W, Phan TQ (2021) Demonstration of a laser powder bed fusion combinatorial sample for high-throughput microstructure and indentation characterization. Mater Des 209:10996910.1016/j.matdes.2021.109969 ↗
13. Wen Y, Zhang B, Narayan RL, Wang P, Song X, Zhao H, Ramamurty U, Qu X (2021) Laser powder bed fusion of compositionally graded CoCrMo-Inconel 718. Addit Manuf 40:101926
14. Eschner N, Weiser L, Häfner B, Lanza G (2020) Classification of specimen density in laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) using in-process structure-borne acoustic process emissions. Addit Manuf 34:101324
15. Drissi-Daoudi R, Pandiyan V, Logé R, Shevchik S, Masinelli G, Ghasemi-Tabasi H, Parrilli A, Wasmer K (2022) Differentiation of materials and laser powder bed fusion processing regimes from airborne acoustic emission combined with machine learning. Virtual Phys Prototyp 17(2):181–20410.1080/17452759.2022.2028380 ↗
16. Halsey W, Rose D, Scime L, Dehoff R, Paquit V (2021) Localized defect detection from spatially mapped, in-situ process data with machine learning. Front Mech Eng 7:76744410.3389/fmech.2021.767444 ↗
17. Scime L, Joslin C, Duncan R, Brinkley F, Ledford C, Siddel D, Paquit V (2022) Layer-wise imaging dataset from powder bed additive manufacturing processes for machine learning applications (peregrine v2022-10), Tech. rep., Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
18. Heiden M, Bolintineanu D, Garland A, Cillessen D, Moore D, Saiz D, Love A, Aragon M (2022) Combining in-situ diagnostics and data analytics for discovery of process-structure-property relationships in AM parts? A step toward digital twins., Tech. rep., Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)10.2172/1892132 ↗
19. Pandiyan V, Drissi-Daoudi R, Shevchik S, Masinelli G, Le-Quang T, Logé R, Wasmer K (2021) Semi-supervised monitoring of laser powder bed fusion process based on acoustic emissions. Virtual Phys Prototyp 16(4):481–49710.1080/17452759.2021.1966166 ↗
20. Zhang L, Chen X, Zhou W, Cheng T, Chen L, Guo Z, Han B, Lu L (2020) Digital twins for additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review. Appl Sci 10(23):835010.3390/app10238350 ↗
21. Bartsch K, Pettke A, Hübert A, Lakämper J, Lange F (2021) On the digital twin application and the role of artificial intelligence in additive manufacturing: a systematic review. J Phys Mater 4(3):03200510.1088/2515-7639/abf3cf ↗
22. Agrawal AK, Thoma DJ (2022) High-throughput surface characterization to identify porosity defects in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel. Addit Manuf Lett 3:100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2022.10009310.1016/j.addlet.2022.100093 ↗
23. Agrawal AK, Meric de Bellefon G, Thoma D (2020) High-throughput experimentation for microstructural design in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13984110.1016/j.msea.2020.139841 ↗
24. Salzbrenner BC, Rodelas JM, Madison JD, Jared BH, Swiler LP, Shen Y-L, Boyce BL (2017) High-throughput stochastic tensile performance of additively manufactured stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 241:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.02310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.023 ↗
25. Melia MA, Whetten SR, Puckett R, Jones M, Heiden MJ, Argibay N, Kustas AB (2020) High-throughput additive manufacturing and characterization of refractory high entropy alloys. Appl Mater Today 19:10056010.1016/j.apmt.2020.100560 ↗
26. Carneiro Í, Simões S (2020) Recent advances in EBSD characterization of metals. Metals 10(8):109710.3390/met10081097 ↗
27. Wisniewski W, Rüssel C (2016) An experimental viewpoint on the information depth of EBSD. Scanning 38(2):164–17110.1002/sca.21251 ↗
28. Goulden J, Trimby P, Bewick A (2018) The benefits and applications of a CMOS-based EBSD detector. Microsc Microanal 24(S1):1128–112910.1017/S1431927618006128 ↗
29. Wright SI, Nowell MM, de Kloe R, Camus P, Rampton T (2015) Electron imaging with an EBSD detector. Ultramicroscopy 148:132–14510.1016/j.ultramic.2014.10.002 ↗
30. Rowenhorst DJ, Nguyen L, Murphy-Leonard AD, Fonda RW (2020) Characterization of microstructure in additively manufactured 316L using automated serial sectioning. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 24(3):10081910.1016/j.cossms.2020.100819 ↗
31. Chapman MG, Uchic MD, Scott JM, Shah MN, Donegan SP, Shade PA, Musinski WD, Obstalecki M, Groeber MA, Menasche D et al (2019) 3D reconstruction of an additive manufactured In625 tensile sample using serial sectioning and multi-modal characterization. Microsc Microanal 25(S2):342–34310.1017/S1431927619002447 ↗
32. Boyce BL, Uchic MD (2019) Progress toward autonomous experimental systems for alloy development. MRS Bull 44(4):273–28010.1557/mrs.2019.75 ↗
33. Miracle DB, Li M, Zhang Z, Mishra R, Flores KM (2021) Emerging capabilities for the high-throughput characterization of structural materials. Annu Rev Mater Res 51:131–16410.1146/annurev-matsci-080619-022100 ↗
34. Hanke LD, Schenk KH, Scholz DR (2016) Broad beam ion milling for microstructure characterization. Mater Perform Charact 5(5):767–779. https://doi.org/10.1520/MPC2016004910.1520/MPC20160049 ↗
35. Nowell MM, Witt RA, True BW (2005) EBSD sample preparation: techniques, tips, and tricks. Microsc Today 13(4):44–4910.1017/S1551929500053669 ↗
36. Wilkinson AJ, Britton TB (2012) Strains, planes, and EBSD in materials science. Mater Today 15(9):366–37610.1016/S1369-7021(12)70163-3 ↗
37. Amirmajdi OM, Ashyer-Soltani R, Clode MP, Mannan SH, Wang Y, Cabruja E, Pellegrini G (2009) Cross-section preparation for solder joints and MEMS device using argon ion beam milling. IEEE Trans Electron Packag Manuf 32(4):265–27110.1109/TEPM.2009.2029344 ↗
38. Hanke LD, Schenk KH, Scholz DR (2016) Broad beam ion milling for microstructure characterization. Mater Perform Charact 5(5):767–77910.1520/MPC20160049 ↗
39. Wynick G, Boehlert C (2005) Use of electropolishing for enhanced metallic specimen preparation for electron backscatter diffraction analysis. Mater Charact 55(3):190–20210.1016/j.matchar.2005.04.008 ↗
40. Van Cauwenbergh P, Samaee V, Thijs L, Nejezchlebová J, Sedlak P, Iveković A, Schryvers D, Van Hooreweder B, Vanmeensel K (2021) Unravelling the multi-scale structure-property relationship of laser powder bed fusion processed and heat-treated AlSi10Mg. Sci Rep 11(1):642310.1038/s41598-021-85047-2 ↗
41. Huang K, Kain C, Diaz-Vallejo N, Sohn Y, Zhou L (2021) High throughput mechanical testing platform and application in metal additive manufacturing and process optimization. J Manuf Process 66:494–50510.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.027 ↗
42. Taha A, Hammad F (1990) Application of the Hall-Petch relation to microhardness measurements on Al, Cu, Al-Md 105, and Al-Cu alloys. Phys Status Solidi (a) 119(2):455–46210.1002/pssa.2211190207 ↗
43. Sabzi HE, Hernandez-Nava E, Li X-H, Fu H, San-Martín D, Rivera-Díaz-del Castillo PE (2021) Strengthening control in laser powder bed fusion of austenitic stainless steels via grain boundary engineering. Mater Des 212:11024610.1016/j.matdes.2021.110246 ↗
44. Esmaeilizadeh R, Keshavarzkermani A, Ali U, Mahmoodkhani Y, Behravesh B, Jahed H, Bonakdar A, Toyserkani E (2020) Customizing mechanical properties of additively manufactured hastelloy x parts by adjusting laser scanning speed. J Alloy Compd 812:15209710.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152097 ↗
45. Promoppatum P, Chayasombat B, Soe AN, Sombatmai A, Sato Y, Suga T, Tsukamoto M (2023) In-situ modification of thermal, microstructural, and mechanical responses by altering scan lengths in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. Opt Laser Technol 164:10952510.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109525 ↗
46. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten J-W, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE et al (2016) The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3(1):1–910.1038/sdata.2016.18 ↗
47. Fowler JE, Ruggles T, Cillessen D, Johnson K, Jauregui L, Henriksen A, Bianco N, Boyce B (2023) High-throughput EBSD characterization of additively manufactured microstructures [data set]. https://doi.org/10.18126/7D9U-EDEV10.18126/7D9U-EDEV ↗
48. Yang D-H, Kim Y-K, Hwang Y, Kim M-S, Lee K-A (2019) Effect of dry-electropolishing on the high cycle fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy manufactured by selective laser melting. J Powder Mater 26(6):471–47610.4150/KPMI.2019.26.6.471 ↗
49. Riu G, Weil D, Llanes L, Johanns KE, Oliver WC, Roa JJ (2022) Surface integrity of new dry-electropolishing technology on wc-co cemented carbides. Proc CIRP 108:543–54810.1016/j.procir.2022.03.085 ↗
50. El-Helieby S, Rowe G (1981) Grinding cracks and microstructural changes in ground steel surfaces. Metals Technol 8(1):58–6610.1179/030716981803275596 ↗
51. Huang X, Zhou Z, Ren Y, Mao C, Li W (2013) Experimental research material characteristics effect on white layers formation in grinding of hardened steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:1555–156110.1007/s00170-012-4439-y ↗
52. Zhou N, Lin Peng R, Pettersson R (2017) Surface characterization of austenitic stainless steel 304L after different grinding operations. Int J Mech Mater Eng 12:1–1410.1186/s40712-017-0074-6 ↗
53. Basha M, Basha S, Jain V, Sankar M (2022) State of the art on chemical and electrochemical based finishing processes for additive manufactured features. Addit Manuf 58:103028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10302810.1016/j.addma.2022.103028 ↗
54. Zuback J, DebRoy T (2018) The hardness of additively manufactured alloys. Materials 11(11):207010.3390/ma11112070 ↗
55. Liu F, Lin X, Shi J, Zhang Y, Bian P, Li X, Hu Y (2019) Effect of microstructure on the charpy impact properties of directed energy deposition 300M steel. Addit Manuf 29:100795
56. Du C, Zhao Y, Jiang J, Wang Q, Wang H, Li N, Sun J (2023) Pore defects in laser powder bed fusion: formation mechanism, control method, and perspectives. J Alloy Compd 944:16921510.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169215 ↗
57. Cepeda-Jiménez C, Potenza F, Magalini E, Luchin V, Molinari A, Pérez-Prado M (2020) Effect of energy density on the microstructure and texture evolution of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Charact 163:11023810.1016/j.matchar.2020.110238 ↗
58. Buhairi MA, Foudzi FM, Jamhari FI, Sulong AB, Radzuan NAM, Muhamad N, Mohamed IF, Azman AH, Harun WSW, Al-Furjan M (2023) Review on volumetric energy density: influence on morphology and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured via laser powder bed fusion. Prog Addit Manuf 8(2):265–28310.1007/s40964-022-00328-0 ↗
59. Perdikouri C, Piazolo S, Kasioptas A, Schmidt BC, Putnis A (2013) Hydrothermal replacement of aragonite by calcite: interplay between replacement, fracturing and growth. Eur J Mineral 25(2):123–13610.1127/0935-1221/2013/0025-2261 ↗
60. Bestmann M, Pennacchioni G, Frank G, Göken M, De Wall H (2011) Pseudotachylyte in muscovite-bearing quartzite: coseismic friction-induced melting and plastic deformation of quartz. J Struct Geol 33(2):169–18610.1016/j.jsg.2010.10.009 ↗
61. Sanjari M, Farzadfar A, Kabir A, Utsunomiya H, Jung I-H, Petrov R, Kestens L, Yue S (2014) Promotion of texture weakening in magnesium by alloying and thermomechanical processing:(i) alloying. J Mater Sci 49:1408–142510.1007/s10853-013-7826-3 ↗
62. Samy VPN, Schäfle M, Brasche F, Krupp U, Haase C (2023) Understanding the mechanism of columnar-to-equiaxed transition and grain refinement in additively manufactured steel during laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 73:103702
63. Narasimharaju SR, Zeng W, See TL, Zhu Z, Scott P, Jiang X, Lou S (2022) A comprehensive review on laser powder bed fusion of steels: processing, microstructure, defects and control methods, mechanical properties, current challenges and future trends. J Manuf Process 75:375–41410.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.033 ↗
64. Ikehata H, Mayweg D, Jägle E (2021) Grain refinement of Fe-Ti alloys fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Des 204:10966510.1016/j.matdes.2021.109665 ↗
65. Watring DS, Benzing JT, Hrabe N, Spear AD (2020) Effects of laser-energy density and build orientation on the structure-property relationships in as-built inconel 718 manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 36:101425
66. Alfieri V, Giannella V, Caiazzo F, Sepe R (2022) Influence of position and building orientation on the static properties of LPBF specimens in 17-4 PH stainless steel. Forces Mech 8:10010810.1016/j.finmec.2022.100108 ↗
67. Elambasseril J, Rogers J, Wallbrink C, Munk D, Leary M, Qian M (2023) Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (LPBF-AM): the influence of design features and LPBF variables on surface topography and effect on fatigue properties. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 48(1):132–16810.1080/10408436.2022.2041396 ↗
68. Dehoff RR, Kirka M, Sames W, Bilheux H, Tremsin A, Lowe L, Babu S (2015) Site specific control of crystallographic grain orientation through electron beam additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Technol 31(8):931–93810.1179/1743284714Y.0000000734 ↗
69. Wilson-Heid AE, Wang Z, McCornac B, Beese AM (2017) Quantitative relationship between anisotropic strain to failure and grain morphology in additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Eng A 706:287–29410.1016/j.msea.2017.09.017 ↗
70. Ronneberg T, Davies CM, Hooper PA (2020) Revealing relationships between porosity, microstructure and mechanical properties of laser powder bed fusion 316L stainless steel through heat treatment. Mater Des 189:10848110.1016/j.matdes.2020.108481 ↗
71. Jacobsen A, Kaliyaperumal R, da Silva Santos LOB, Mons B, Schultes E, Roos M, Thompson M (2020) A generic workflow for the data fairification process. Data Intell 2(1–2):56–6510.1162/dint_a_00028 ↗