Blockchain-Based Security Access Control System for Sharing Squeeze Casting Process Database
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Ghomashchi MR, Vikhrov A (2000) Squeeze casting: an overview. J Mater Process Technol 101:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00291-510.1016/S0924-0136(99)00291-5 ↗
2. Mourad A-HI, Christy JV, Krishnan PK, Mozumder MS (2023) Production of novel recycled hybrid metal matrix composites using optimized stir squeeze casting technique. J Manuf Processes 88:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.04010.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.040 ↗
3. Deng J, Xie B, You D et al (2022) Process parameters design of squeeze casting through an improved KNN algorithm and existing data. J Manuf Processes 84:1320–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.07410.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.074 ↗
4. Deng J, Xie B, You D, Huang H (2023) Review of design of process parameters for squeeze casting. Chin J Mech Eng 36:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-023-00979-210.1186/s10033-023-00979-2 ↗
5. Li J, Sun Y, Wang Y, Sun J (2022) Optimization of squeeze casting process of gearbox cover based on FEM and Box-Behnken design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 118:3421–3430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08099-810.1007/s00170-021-08099-8 ↗
6. Fr S, J A, Chanakyan C, (2023) Optimization of squeeze casting process parameters on mechanical properties of SiCp reinforced LM25 composites through Taguchi technique. Mater Res Express 10:076515. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ace75e10.1088/2053-1591/ace75e ↗
7. Muthu Kamatchi R, Muraliraja R (2023) Optimization of squeeze casting process parameters for the production of Al composite reinforced with bone powder, Mater Today Proc, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.22210.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.222 ↗
8. Azhagan MT, Mohan B (2021) Parametric optimization in squeeze casting of AA6061-Si3N4 composites using Taguchi method. J Ceram Process Res 22:470–474
9. Batra R, Song L, Ramprasad R (2021) Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning. Nat Rev Mater 6:655–678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y ↗
10. Gjerding MN, Taghizadeh A, Rasmussen A et al (2021) Recent progress of the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB). 2D Mater 8:04400210.1088/2053-1583/ac1059 ↗
11. Marechal L, Balland P, Lindenroth L et al (2021) Toward a common framework and database of materials for soft robotics. Soft Rob 8:284–297. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2019.011510.1089/soro.2019.0115 ↗
12. Rosen AS, Iyer SM, Ray D et al (2021) Machine learning the quantum-chemical properties of metal–organic frameworks for accelerated materials discovery. Matter 4:1578–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.01510.1016/j.matt.2021.02.015 ↗
13. Vergniory MG, Wieder BJ, Elcoro L, et al (2022) All topological bands of all nonmagnetic stoichiometric materials. Science 376:eabg9094. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg909410.1126/science.abg9094 ↗
14. Huang S, Cole JM (2020) A database of battery materials auto-generated using ChemDataExtractor. Sci Data 7:260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00602-210.1038/s41597-020-00602-2 ↗
15. Jie J, Weng M, Li S et al (2019) A new MaterialGo database and its comparison with other high-throughput electronic structure databases for their predicted energy band gaps. Sci China Technol Sci 62:1423–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-9514-510.1007/s11431-019-9514-5 ↗
16. Saal JE, Kirklin S, Aykol M et al (2013) Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD). JOM 65:1501–1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-410.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
17. Natrayan L, Senthil Kumar M (2020) An integrated artificial neural network and Taguchi approach to optimize the squeeze cast process parameters of AA6061/Al2O3/SiC/Gr hybrid composites prepared by novel encapsulation feeding technique. Mater Today Commun 25:101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10158610.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101586 ↗
18. Adithiyaa T, Chandramohan D, Sathish T (2020) Optimal prediction of process parameters by GWO-KNN in stirring-squeeze casting of AA2219 reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Today: Proc 21:1000–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.05110.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.051 ↗
19. Panicker PG, Kuriakose S (2023) Parameter optimisation of squeeze casting process using LM 20 Alloy: numeral analysis by neural network and modified coefficient-based deer hunting optimization. Aust J Mech Eng 21:351–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2020.184230610.1080/14484846.2020.1842306 ↗
20. Horstemeyer MF, Huddleston BD, Bagheri A et al (2020) Universal material constants for MultiStage Fatigue (MSF) modeling of the Process–Structure–Property (PSP) relations of A000, 2000, 5000, and 7000 series aluminum alloys. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:157–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-020-00175-310.1007/s40192-020-00175-3 ↗
21. Namasudra S, Deka GC, Johri P et al (2021) The revolution of blockchain: state-of-the-art and research challenges. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28:1497–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09426-010.1007/s11831-020-09426-0 ↗
22. Javaid M, Haleem A, Pratap Singh R et al (2021) Blockchain technology applications for Industry 4.0: a literature-based review. Blockchain Res Appl 2:100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2021.10002710.1016/j.bcra.2021.100027 ↗
23. Zaabar B, Cheikhrouhou O, Jamil F et al (2021) HealthBlock: a secure blockchain-based healthcare data management system. Comput Networks 200:108500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.10850010.1016/j.comnet.2021.108500 ↗
24. Zhang W, Wang Z, Li X (2023) Blockchain-based decentralized federated transfer learning methodology for collaborative machinery fault diagnosis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 229:108885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.10888510.1016/j.ress.2022.108885 ↗
25. Li D, Hu Y, Lan M (2020) IoT device location information storage system based on blockchain. Future Gener Comput Syst 109:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.03.02510.1016/j.future.2020.03.025 ↗
26. Rui H, Huan L, Yang H, YunHao Z (2020) Research on secure transmission and storage of energy IoT information based on Blockchain. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 13:1225–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-019-00856-710.1007/s12083-019-00856-7 ↗
27. Abunadi I, Kumar RL (2021) BSF-EHR: blockchain security framework for electronic health records of patients. Sensors 21:2865. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2108286510.3390/s21082865 ↗
28. Lusetti M, Salsi L, Dallatana A (2020) A blockchain based solution for the custody of digital files in forensic medicine. Forensic Sci Int: Digital Invest 35:301017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.30101710.1016/j.fsidi.2020.301017 ↗
29. Wang W, Yang Y, Yin Z et al (2022) BSIF: blockchain-based secure, interactive, and fair mobile crowdsensing. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 40:3452–3469. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2022.321330610.1109/JSAC.2022.3213306 ↗
30. Jabarulla MY, Lee H-N (2021) Blockchain-based distributed patient-centric image management system. Appl Sci 11:196. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1101019610.3390/app11010196 ↗
31. Zhang L, Peng M, Wang W et al (2021) Secure and efficient data storage and sharing scheme based on double blockchain. Comput Mater Contin 66:499–515
32. Ye H, Park S (2021) Reliable vehicle data storage using blockchain and IPFS. Electronics 10:1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics1010113010.3390/electronics10101130 ↗