Quantifying Thermal Model Accuracy in PBF-LB/M using Statistical Similarity Tests Against Thermographic Measurements
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Numerical simulation models for laser powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) vary in complexity and fidelity, ranging from high-fidelity models that capture melt pool dynamics to simplified models suited for part-scale temperature predictions and process optimizations. Validation against experimental data is essential to build confidence in their predictive capabilities. However, for in-situ thermographic measurements, a direct comparison is challenging due to the data’s size and the multi-scale nature of the process. Similarities must be analyzed at different spatial and temporal scales based on the model’s fidelity and its intended application. For example, agreement between a thermal simulation and measurement in a steady-state scenario does not guarantee accuracy during transient phases. Statistical similarity measures provide a quantitative means to assess model-measurement agreement, highlighting regions of high and low similarity. In this work, we validate a thermal simulation model, discretized using the space-time finite element method, against thermographic camera measurements using various similarity measures and evaluate their applicability to PBF-LB/M. We also propose a multi-scale similarity assessment approach tailored to model fidelity and application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Yadroitsev I, I Yadroitsava. 2021 "A step-by-step guide to the L-PBF process." Fundamentals of laser powder bed fusion of metals. Elsevier, 39-7710.1016/B978-0-12-824090-8.00026-3 ↗
2. Zhao C, Shi B, Chen S, Du D, Sun T, Simonds BJ, Fezzaa K, Rollett AD (2022) Laser melting modes in metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Rev Mod Phys 94(4):04500210.1103/RevModPhys.94.045002 ↗
3. Fox JC, Evans CJ, Weaver JS, Redford JK (2023) Surface topography and melt pool behavior in rapid turnaround regions of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of nickel superalloy 625. CIRP Ann 72(1):193–19610.1016/j.cirp.2023.04.024 ↗
4. Redford J, J Fox, and C Evans. 2024 "A critical cooling constant to clarify track-to-track overheating in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of IN625." Proceedings of joint special interest group meeting between EUSPEN and ASPE, Golden.
5. Redford J, Fox J, Evans C, Mullany B, Allen A, Morse E (2023) Center-line-time functions and critical constants for predicting laser powder bed fusion melt pool distortion using one surface topography measurement. In: Proceedings of joint special interest group meeting between Euspen and ASPE advancing precision in additive manufacturing, Leuven. 241-316
6. Holla V, Grünewald J, Kopp P, Praegla PM, Meier C, Wudy K, Kollmannsberger S (2024) Validity of thermal simulation models for different laser beam shapes in bead-on-plate melting. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-024-00382-210.1007/s40192-024-00382-2 ↗
7. Yeung H, Lane B (2020) A residual heat compensation based scan strategy for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Manuf Lett 25:56–5910.1016/j.mfglet.2020.07.005 ↗
8. Meier C, Penny RW, Zou Y, Gibbs JS, Hart AJ (2017) Thermophysical phenomena in metal additive manufacturing by selective laser melting: fundamentals, modeling, simulation, and experimentation. Annu Rev Heat Transf 20: 241–31610.1615/AnnualRevHeatTransfer.2018019042 ↗
9. King W, Anderson AT, Ferencz RM, Hodge NE, Kamath C, Khairallah SA (2015) Overview of modelling and simulation of metal powder bed fusion process at Lawrence livermore national laboratory. Mater Sci Technol 31(8):957–96810.1179/1743284714Y.0000000728 ↗
10. Khairallah SA, Anderson AT, Rubenchik A, King WE (2016) Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Mater 108:36–4510.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 ↗
11. Panwisawas C, Perumal B, Ward RM, Turner N, Turner RP, Brooks JW, Basoalto HC (2017) Keyhole formation and thermal fluid flow-induced porosity during laser fusion welding in titanium alloys: experimental and modelling. Acta Mater 126:251–26310.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.062 ↗
12. Khairallah SA, Anderson A (2014) Mesoscopic simulation model of selective laser melting of stainless steel powder. J Mater Process Technol 214(11):2627–263610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.001 ↗
13. Holla V, Kopp P, Grünewald J, Wudy K, Kollmannsberger S (2023) Laser beam shape optimization in powder bed fusion of metals. Addit Manuf 72:103609
14. Carraturo M, Lane B, Yeung H, Kollmannsberger S, Reali A, Auricchio F (2020) Numerical evaluation of advanced laser control strategies influence on residual stresses for laser powder bed fusion systems. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:435–44510.1007/s40192-020-00191-3 ↗
15. Holla V, Redford J, Kopp P, Kollmannsberger S (2025) The trace of heat: on the predictive power of modeling transient diffusion. Progr Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-025-01147-910.1007/s40964-025-01147-9 ↗
16. Chiumenti M, Neiva E, Salsi E, Cervera M, Badia S, Moya J, Chen Z, Lee C, Davies C (2017) Numerical modelling and experimental validation in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 18:171–185
17. Grünewald J, Prudlik R, Holla V, Kopp P, Off R, Stoll T, Kollmannsberger S, Wudy K (2024) Generating brick-like melt pools for laser-based powder bed fusion using flexible beam shaping: a proof of concept on bead-on-plate single tracks. Proced CIRP 124:746–75010.1016/j.procir.2024.08.216 ↗
18. Kollmannsberger S, Carraturo M, Reali A, Auricchio F (2019) Accurate prediction of melt pool shapes in laser powder bed fusion by the non-linear temperature equation including phase changes: model validity: isotropic versus anisotropic conductivity to capture AM Benchmark Test AMB2018-02. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 8:167–17710.1007/s40192-019-00132-9 ↗
19. Lane B, Deisenroth D (2023) In-process thermography of metal additive manufacturing processes. ASM International . https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.hb.v24A.a000695410.31399/asm.hb.v24A.a0006954 ↗
20. Mazzoleni L, Demir AG, Caprio L, Pacher M, Previtali B (2019) Real-time observation of melt pool in selective laser melting: spatial, temporal, and wavelength resolution criteria. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 69(4):1179–119010.1109/TIM.2019.2912236 ↗
21. Chandrasekar S, Coble JB, List F III, Carver K, Beauchamp S, Godfrey A, Paquit V, Babu SS (2022) Similarity analysis for thermal signature comparison in metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des 224:11126110.1016/j.matdes.2022.111261 ↗
22. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2022) AMB2022-03 Benchmark Measurements and Challenge Problems. https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2022/05/26/AMB2022-03%20Measurement%20and%20Challenge%20Descriptions_1.01.pdf. Accessed: 2025-07-01
23. Lane B, Yeung H, Yang Z (2022) Statistical and spatio-temporal data features in melt pool monitoring of additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 2022 IISE Annual Conference, pp. 1–6. Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE)
24. Zenzinger G, Bamberg J, Ladewig A, Hess T, Henkel B, Satzger W (2015) Process monitoring of additive manufacturing by using optical tomography. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol. 1650, pp. 164–170. American Institute of Physics10.1063/1.4914606 ↗
25. Deisenroth D, Mekhontsev S, Lane B, Weaver J, Yeung H (2024) AM Bench 2022 measurement results data: in-situ thermography and scan strategy for laser-scanned single tracks and pads on bare In718 (AMB2022-03). National Institute of Standards and Technology. Accessed 07 Apr 2025
26. AMBench N (2022) AMB2022-03 benchmark measurements and challenge problems
27. Lane B, Heigel J, Ricker R, Zhirnov I, Khromschenko V, Weaver J, Phan T, Stoudt M, Mekhontsev S, Levine L (2020) Measurements of melt pool geometry and cooling rates of individual laser traces on IN625 bare plates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:16–3010.1007/s40192-020-00169-1 ↗
28. Kopp P, Calo V, Rank E, Kollmannsberger S (2022) Space-time hp-finite elements for heat evolution in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Eng Comput 38(6):4879–489310.1007/s00366-022-01719-1 ↗
29. Agazhanov AS, Samoshkin D, Kozlovskii YM (2019) Thermophysical properties of Inconel 718 alloy. In: Journal of physics: conference series, vol. 1382, p. 012175. IOP Publishing10.1088/1742-6596/1382/1/012175 ↗
30. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–61210.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗
31. Simonds BJ, Tanner J, Artusio-Glimpse A, Williams PA, Parab N, Zhao C, Sun T (2021) The causal relationship between melt pool geometry and energy absorption measured in real time during laser-based manufacturing. Appl Mater Today 23:10104910.1016/j.apmt.2021.101049 ↗
32. Wang Z, Simoncelli EP, Bovik AC (2003) Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2:1398–14022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2003.129221610.1109/ACSSC.2003.1292216 ↗
33. Lane B, Deisenroth D, Yeung H, Mekhontsev S, Grantham S, Levine L, Neira J (2023) AM Bench 2022 measurement results data: 3D builds in-situ thermography and data processing scripts (AMB2022-01). National Institute of Standards and Technology. Accessed 11 Oct 2025. https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-271510.18434/mds2-2715 ↗
34. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, Burovski E, Peterson P, Weckesser W, Bright J et al (2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 17(3):261–27210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
35. Ramos-Carreño C, Torrecilla JL (2023) dcor: distance correlation and energy statistics in Python. SoftwareX 22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2023.10132610.1016/j.softx.2023.101326 ↗
36. Walt S, Schönberger JL, Nunez-Iglesias J, Boulogne F, Warner JD, Yager N, Gouillart E, Yu T (2014) contributors: scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ 2:453. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.45310.7717/peerj.453 ↗