Cross-Sectional Melt Pool Geometry of Laser Scanned Tracks and Pads on Nickel Alloy 718 for the 2022 Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Challenges
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Series (AM Bench) is a NIST-led organization that provides a continuing series of additive manufacturing benchmark measurements, challenge problems, and conferences with the primary goal of enabling modelers to test their simulations against rigorous, highly controlled additive manufacturing benchmark measurement data. To this end, single-track (1D) and pad (2D) scans on bare plate nickel alloy 718 were completed with thermography, cross-sectional grain orientation and local chemical composition maps, and cross-sectional melt pool size measurements. The laser power, scan speed, and laser spot size were varied for single tracks, and the scan direction was varied for pads. This article focuses on the cross-sectional melt pool size measurements and presents the predictions from challenge problems. Single-track depth correlated with volumetric energy density while width did not (within the studied parameters). The melt pool size for pad scans was greater than single tracks due to heat buildup. Pad scan melt pool depth was reduced when the laser scan direction and gas flow direction were parallel. The melt pool size in pad scans showed little to no trend against position within the pads. Uncertainty budgets for cross-sectional melt pool size from optical micrographs are provided for the purpose of model validation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. NIST (2023) Additive manufacturing benchmark test series (AM-Bench). Available at https://www.nist.gov/ambench
2. Levine L, Lane B, Heigel J, Migler K, Stoudt M, Phan T, Ricker R, Strantza M, Hill M, Zhang F, Seppala J, Garboczi EJ, Bain E, Cole D, Allen AJ, Fox J, Campbell CE (2020) Outcomes and conclusions from the 2018 AM-Bench measurements, challenge problems, modeling submissions, and conference. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-019-00164-110.1007/s40192-019-00164-1 ↗
3. Schwalbach EJ, Chapman MG, Groeber MA (2021) AFRL additive manufacturing modeling series: challenge 2, microscale process-to-structure data description. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10(3):319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00220-910.1007/s40192-021-00220-9 ↗
4. Montgomery C, Beuth J, Sheridan L, Klingbeil N (2015) Process mapping of Inconel 625 in laser powder bed additive manufacturing. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, pp 1195–1204
5. MSFC N (2017) Specification for control and qualification of laser powder bed fusion metallurgical processes. MSFC Technical Standard MSFC-SPEC-3717.
6. Levine L, Lane B, Becker C, Belak J, Carson R, Deisenroth D, E. G, Gnaeupel-Herold TH, Gorelik M, Green G, Habib S, Higgins C, Hill M, Hrabe N, Kilgore J, Kim J, G. L, Migler K, Rowenhorst DJ, Moylan S, Pagan DC, Phan T, Praniewicz M, Simmonds B, Stoudt M, Schwalbach EJ, Seppala J, Weaver JS, Yeung H, Zhang F (2023) Outcomes and conclusions from the 2022 AM Bench measurements, challenge problems, modeling submissions, and conference. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. Manuscript in preparation10.1007/s40192-024-00372-4 ↗
7. Weaver JS, Deisenroth D, Mekhontsev S, Lane B, Levine LE, Yeung H (2022) AM Bench 2022 measurement results data: optical microscopy of laser-scanned single tracks and pads (AMB2022-03). NIST, https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-271810.18434/mds2-2718 ↗
8. Deisenroth D, Mekhontsev S, Lane B, Weaver JS, Yeung H (2022) AM Bench 2022 measurement results data: in-situ thermography and scan strategy for laser-scanned single tracks and pads on bare In718 (AMB2022–03). NIST, https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-271610.18434/mds2-2716 ↗
9. Deisenroth D, Weaver JS, Yeung H, Mekhontsev S, Lane BM, Levine LE (2024) Laser-scanned tracks and pads and in-situ thermography for the 2022 additive manufacturing benchmark challenges. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. Manuscript in preparation
10. Williams ME, Stoudt MR, Young S, Weaver JS, Levine LE (2024) AM Bench 2022 Cross sectional microstructure of single laser tracks produced using different processing conditions and 2D arrays of laser tracks (pads) on solid plates of nickel alloy 718. (NIST). Dataset in preparation
11. Levine LE, Williams ME, Stoudt MR, Weaver JS, Young S, Deisenroth D, Lane B (2023) Location-specific microstructure characterization within AM Bench 2022 laser tracks on bare nickel alloy 718 plates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. Manuscript submitted for publication10.1007/s40192-024-00361-7 ↗
12. Lane B, Deisenroth D, Yeung H, Mekhontsev S, Grantham S, Levine L, Neira J (2023) AM Bench 2022 Measurement results data: 3d builds in-situ thermography and data processing scripts (AMB2022-01). (National Institute of Standards and Technology, https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-2715)10.18434/mds2-2715 ↗
13. Lane B, Deisenroth D, Yeung H, Levine L, Mekhontsev S, Phan T (2024) In-situ thermographic measurements of 3D bridge structure for the 2022 additive manufacturing benchmark test series (AMB2022-01). Integr Mater Manuf Innov. Manuscript in preparation
14. Levine LE, Williams ME, Zhang F, Schwalbach EJ, Young S, Stoudt MR, Creuziger A, Borkiewicz OJ, llavsky J (2023) AM Bench 2022 microstructure measurements for IN718 3D builds. (NIST, https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-2692)10.18434/mds2-2692 ↗
15. Levine L, Williams ME, Creuziger A, Stoudt MR, Young S, Moon K-W, Lane B (2024) Location-specific microstructure characterization within AM Bench 2022 nickel alloy 718 3D builds. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. Manuscript in preparation10.1007/s40192-024-00361-7 ↗
16. Lane B, Mekhontsev S, Grantham S, Vlasea M, Whiting J, Yeung H, Fox J, Zarobila C, Neira J, McGlauflin M (2016) Design, developments, and results from the NIST additive manufacturing metrology testbed (AMMT). Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, pp 1145–1160
17. ISO, ASTM (2019) ASTM ISO/ASTM52921-13(2019) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing-coordinate systems and test methodologies. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
18. NIST (2023) AM Bench 2022 Measurements and challenge problems. Available at https://www.nist.gov/ambench/am-bench-2022-measurements-and-challenge-problems
19. Lane B, Heigel J, Ricker R, Zhirnov I, Khromschenko V, Weaver J, Phan T, Stoudt M, Mekhontsev S, Levine L (2020) Measurements of melt pool geometry and cooling rates of individual laser traces on IN625 bare plates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-020-00169-110.1007/s40192-020-00169-1 ↗
20. Anwar AB, Pham Q-C (2017) Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg: Effects of scan direction, part placement and inert gas flow velocity on tensile strength. J Mater Process Technol 240:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.015 ↗
21. Weaver J, Schlenoff A, Deisenroth D, Moylan S (2023) Assessing the influence of non-uniform gas speed on the melt pool depth in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 29(8):1580–1591. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2022-036610.1108/RPJ-10-2022-0366 ↗
22. Ye J, Khairallah SA, Rubenchik AM, Crumb MF, Guss G, Belak J, Matthews MJ (2019) Energy coupling mechanisms and scaling behavior associated with laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Adv Eng Mater 21(7):190018510.1002/adem.201900185 ↗
23. Deisenroth DC, Mekhontsev S, Lane B (2020) Measurement of mass loss, absorbed energy, and time-resolved reflected power for laser powder bed fusion. Laser 3D Manufacturing VII 11271:46–58
24. Gan Z, Jones KK, Lu Y, Liu WK (2021) Benchmark study of melted track geometries in laser powder bed fusion of inconel 625. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10(2):177–19510.1007/s40192-021-00209-4 ↗
25. Fox JC, Evans CJ, Weaver JS, Redford JK (2023) Surface topography and melt pool behavior in rapid turnaround regions of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of nickel superalloy 625. CIRP Ann 72(1):193–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2023.04.02410.1016/j.cirp.2023.04.024 ↗
26. Taylor BN, Kuyatt CE (1994) Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results (US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology), 1297