MAUD Rietveld Refinement Software for Neutron Diffraction Texture Studies of Single- and Dual-Phase Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
This work presents a detailed instructional demonstration using the Rietveld refinement software MAUD for evaluating the crystallographic texture of single- and dual-phase materials, as applied to High-Pressure-Preferred-Orientation (HIPPO) neutron diffraction data obtained at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) pole figures on Ti-6Al-4V produced by additive manufacturing. This work addresses a number of hidden challenges intrinsic to Rietveld refinement and operation of the software to improve users' experiences when using MAUD. A systematic evaluation of each step in the MAUD refinement process is described, focusing on devising a consistent refinement process for any version of MAUD and any material system, while also calling out required updates to previously developed processes. A number of possible issues users may encounter are documented and explained, along with a multilayered assessment for validating when a MAUD refinement procedure is finished for any dataset. A brief discussion on appropriate sample symmetries is also included to highlight possible oversimplifications of the texture data extracted from MAUD. Included in the appendix of this work are two systematic walkthroughs applying the process described. Files for these walkthroughs can be found at the data repository located at: https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-2400.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Lutterotti L, Matthies S, Wenk H-R, Schultz AS, Richardson JW (1997) Combined texture and structure analysis of deformed limestone from time-of-flight neutron diffraction spectra. J Appl Phys 81:594–600. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.36422010.1063/1.364220 ↗
2. Wenk H-R, Lutterotti L, Vogel SC (2010) Rietveld texture analysis from TOF neutron diffraction data. Powder Diffr 25:283–296. https://doi.org/10.1154/1.347900410.1154/1.3479004 ↗
3. Lutterotti L (2000) MAUD tutorial—computing ODF from traditional pole figures using WIMV,10
4. Creuziger AA (2021) MAUD-Tutorial Files for “MAUD rietveld refinement software for neutron diffraction texture studies of single and dual-phase materials,” 11 files, 18.7 MB. https://doi.org/10.18434/MDS2-240010.18434/MDS2-2400 ↗
5. Toby BH (2019) Rietveld refinement. In: International tables for crystallography. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 344–37310.1107/97809553602060000962 ↗
6. Matthies S, Lutteroti L, Wenk HR (1997) Advances in texture analysis from diffraction spectra. J Appl Crystallogr 30:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188989600685110.1107/S0021889896006851 ↗
7. Rietveld HM (1969) A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J Appl Crystallogr 2:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188986900655810.1107/S0021889869006558 ↗
8. Rietveld HM (1988) The Rietveld method—a historical perspective. Aust. J Phys. 41. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1988AuJPh.41.113R&defaultprint=YES&filetype=.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2020.10.1071/PH880113 ↗
9. Takajo S, Vogel SC (2018) Determination of pole figure coverage for texture measurements with neutron time-of-flight diffractometers. J Appl Crystallogr 51:895–900. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057671800773210.1107/S1600576718007732 ↗
10. Toby BH, Von Dreele RB (2013) GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package. J Appl Crystallogr 46:544–549. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188981300353110.1107/S0021889813003531 ↗
11. Saville A, Klemm-Toole J, Vogel SC, Creuziger A, Benzing J, Clarke AJ, Pilchak AL, Nandwana P, Semiatin SL (2021) Texture evolution as a function of scan strategy and build height in electron beam melted Ti–6Al–4V. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10211810.1016/j.addma.2021.102118 ↗
12. Larson AC, Dreele RBV (2004) GSAS—general structure analysis system, Los Alamos National Laboratory
13. Saville AI, Klemm-Toole J, Vogel SC, Kumar SK, Clarke AJ (2019) Texture evolution in Ti–6Al–4V with different scan strategies. Adv Addit Manuf Powder Metall AMPM 2019:667–672
14. McCusker LB, Von Dreele RB, Cox DE, Louër D, Scardi P (1999) Rietveld refinement guidelines. J Appl Crystallogr 32:36–50. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188989800985610.1107/S0021889898009856 ↗
15. Miyagi L, Merkel S, Yagi T, Sata N, Ohishi Y, Wenk H-R (2006) Quantitative Rietveld texture analysis of CaSiO3 perovskite deformed in a diamond anvil cell. J Phys Condens Matter 18(2006):S995–S1005. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/18/25/S0710.1088/0953-8984/18/25/S07 ↗
16. Toby BH (2006) R factors in Rietveld analysis: How good is good enough? Powder Diffr 21:67–70. https://doi.org/10.1154/1.217980410.1154/1.2179804 ↗