journal article·2021-06-10Open access

Optimal Reactive Power Generation for Transmission Power Systems Considering Discrete Values of Capacitors and Tap Changers

Le Chi Kien, Chiem Trong Hien, Thang Trung Nguyen

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 12

Abstract

In this paper, an improved coyote optimization algorithm (ICOA) is developed for determining control parameters of transmission power networks to deal with an optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) problem. The performance of ICOA method is superior to its conventional coyote optimization algorithm (COA) thanks to modifications of two new solution generations of COA. COA uses a center solution to generate an update step size in the first solution generation and produced one new solution by using random factors to diversify the search space in the second solution generation. By tackling the drawbacks of COA, ICOA can reduce control parameters and computation steps, shorten execution time, and provide better results. ICOA is compared to its conventional COA for three standard IEEE systems of 30-, 57-, and 118-buses with continuous and discrete control variables. Moreover, three other algorithms such as water cycle algorithm (WCA), salp swarm algorithm (SSA), and sunflower optimization algorithm (SFOA) have been also implemented for further investigation of the real performance of the proposed method. All the applied methods are metaheuristic algorithms based on population and randomization. The result comparison from the test systems has indicated that ICOA can provide higher solution quality than other methods with reasonable execution time. Therefore, ICOA is a reliable tool for finding optimal solutions of the ORPD problem.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Optimal Power Flow Distribution · Electric Power System Optimization · Power System Optimization and Stability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Food Industry, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

Power System Optimization Research Group, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam

Funding

Ministry of Education and Training

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. An efficient differential evolution algorithm for stochastic OPF based active-reactive power dispatch problem considering renewable generators10.1016/j.asoc.2018.12.025 ↗
2. Modified differential evolution approach for practical optimal reactive power dispatch of hybrid AC-DC power systems10.1016/j.asoc.2018.08.038 ↗
3. Nguyen, T.T., Vu Quynh, N., Duong, M.Q., and Van Dai, L. (2018). Modified differential evolution algorithm: A novel approach to optimize the operation of hydrothermal power systems while considering the different constraints and valve point loading effects. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11030540 ↗
4. Hierarchical distributed mixed-integer optimization for reactive power dispatch10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.730 ↗
5. Modified Newton method for reactive dispatching10.1016/S0142-0615(02)00013-3 ↗
6. Venkatesh, B., Sasadivam, G., and Khan, M.A. (February, January 31). Towards on-line optimal reactive power scheduling using ANN memory model based method. Proceedings of the Power Engineering Society 1999 Winter Meeting, New York, NY, USA.10.1109/PESW.1999.747273 ↗
7. Real power loss minimization using interior point method10.1016/S0142-0615(00)00028-4 ↗
8. Reactive power optimization using successive quadratic programming method10.1109/59.736232 ↗
9. Cao, Y.J., and Wu, Q.H. (1997, January 2–4). Optimal reactive power dispatch using an adaptive genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms in Engineering Systems, Glasgow, UK.10.1049/cp:19971166 ↗
10. Optimal reactive power dispatch using self-adaptive real coded genetic algorithm10.1016/j.epsr.2008.07.008 ↗
11. Alam, M.S., and De, M. (2016, January 19–21). Optimal reactive power dispatch using hybrid loop-genetic based algorithm. Proceedings of the Power Systems Conference (NPSC) IEEE, Bhubaneswar, India.10.1109/NPSC.2016.7858901 ↗
12. Rayudu, K., Yesuratnam, G., and Jayalaxmi, A. (2016, January 3–5). Improving voltage stability by optimal reactive power dispatch based on genetic algorithm and linear programming technique. Proceedings of the International Conference on IEEE: Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), Chennai, India.10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7754904 ↗
13. Văduva, A.M., and Bulac, C. (2016, January 6–8). New evolutionary algorithm method for solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on IEEE on Applied and Theoretical Electricity (ICATE), Craiova, Romania.10.1109/ICATE.2016.7754626 ↗
14. Villa-Acevedo, W., López-Lezama, J., and Valencia-Velásquez, J.A. (2018). A novel constraint handling approach for the optimal reactive power dispatch problem. Energies, 11.10.20944/preprints201807.0524.v1 ↗
15. Probabilistic optimal power flow considering load and solar power uncertainties using particle swarm optimization
16. Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization for reactive power dispatch10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.038 ↗
17. Optimal reactive power dispatch by particle swarm optimization with an aging leader and challengers10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.006 ↗
18. Reddy, P.L., and Yesuratnam, G. (2015, January 15–17). PSO based optimal reactive power dispatch for voltage profile improvement. Proceedings of the Power, Communication and Information Technology Conference (PCITC) on IEEE, Bhubaneswar, India.10.1109/PCITC.2015.7438192 ↗
19. Optimal reactive power dispatch using improved pseudo-gradient search particle swarm optimization10.1080/15325008.2015.1112449 ↗
20. Multi-objective security constrained optimal active and reactive power dispatch using hybrid particle swarm optimization and differential evolution
21. Solution of optimal reactive power dispatch of power systems using hybrid particle swarm optimization and imperialist competitive algorithms10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.03.039 ↗
22. Kaur, D., Lie, T.T., Nair, N.K., and Valles, B. (2016, January 14–16). An optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) for voltage security using particle swarm optimization (PSO) in graph theory. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET), Hanoi, Vietnam.10.1109/ICSET.2016.7811751 ↗
23. Sahli, Z., Hamouda, A., Bekrar, A., and Trentesaux, D. (2018). Reactive power dispatch optimization with voltage profile improvement using an efficient hybrid algorithm. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11082134 ↗
24. Differential evolution algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch10.1016/j.epsr.2010.10.005 ↗
25. Combined differential evolution algorithm and ant system for optimal reactive power dispatch10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.1082 ↗
26. Modified teaching learning algorithm and double differential evolution algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch problem: A comparative study10.1016/j.ins.2014.03.050 ↗
27. Quasi-oppositional differential evolution for optimal reactive power dispatch10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.067 ↗
28. Reactive power optimization using hybrid CABC-DE algorithm10.1080/15325008.2017.1311387 ↗
29. Optimal reactive power dispatch using a gravitational search algorithm10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0681 ↗
30. Babu, M.R., and Lakshmi, M. (2016, January 30–31). Gravitational search algorithm based approach for optimal reactive power dispatch. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on IEEE on Science Technology Engineering and Management (ICONSTEM), Chennai, India.10.1109/ICONSTEM.2016.7560977 ↗
31. Optimal reactive power dispatch by improved GSA-based algorithm with the novel strategies to handle constraints10.1016/j.asoc.2016.11.008 ↗
32. Rayudu, K., Yesuratnam, G., and Jayalaxmi, A. (2017, January 20–21). Ant colony optimization algorithm based optimal reactive power dispatch to improve voltage stability. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on IEEE on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), Kollam, India.10.1109/ICCPCT.2017.8074391 ↗
33. Optimal reactive power dispatch using quasi-oppositional teaching learning based optimization10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.04.011 ↗
34. Solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem using a novel teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm10.1016/j.engappai.2014.12.001 ↗
35. Sulaiman, M.H., and Mustaffa, Z. (2017, January 24–26). Cuckoo Search Algorithm as an optimizer for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch problems. Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Conference on IEEE on Control, Automation and Robotics, Nagoya, Japan.10.1109/ICCAR.2017.7942794 ↗
36. One rank cuckoo search algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch
37. Optimal reactive power dispatch based on harmony search algorithm10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.11.018 ↗
38. Solution of optimal reactive power dispatch by chaotic krill herd algorithm10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0077 ↗
39. Optimal reactive power dispatch using hybrid Nelder-Mead simplex based firefly algorithm10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.10.041 ↗
40. Using the gray wolf optimizer for solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem10.1016/j.asoc.2015.03.041 ↗
41. Rayudu, K., Yesuratnam, G., and Jayalaxmi, A. (2016, January 18–19). Artificial Bee Colony algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch to improve voltage stability. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on IEEE on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), Nagercoil, India.10.1109/ICCPCT.2016.7530203 ↗
42. Exchange market algorithm based optimum reactive power dispatch10.1016/j.asoc.2016.02.041 ↗
43. Optimal reactive-power dispatch using differential search algorithm10.1007/s00202-016-0410-5 ↗
44. Ant lion optimizer for solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem in power systems, engineering science and technology
45. Anbarasan, P., and Jayabarathi, T. (2017, January 6–9). Optimal reactive power dispatch problem solved by an improved colliding bodies optimization algorithm. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on IEEE on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2017 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Milan, Italy.10.1109/EEEIC.2017.7977592 ↗
46. Gaussian bare-bones water cycle algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch in electrical power systems10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.048 ↗
47. Solving reactive power dispatch problem by using JAYA optimization Algorithm
48. Optimal reactive power dispatch solution by loss minimization using moth-flame optimization technique10.1016/j.asoc.2017.05.057 ↗
49. Optimal reactive power dispatch problem using a two-archive multi-objective grey wolf optimizer10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.009 ↗
50. Whale optimization algorithm based optimal reactive power dispatch: A case study of the Algerian power system10.1016/j.epsr.2017.09.001 ↗
51. Optimal reactive power dispatch under unbalanced conditions using hybrid swarm intelligence10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.05.011 ↗
52. Meddeb, A., Amor, N., Abbes, M., and Chebbi, S. (2018). A novel approach based on crow search algorithm for solving reactive power dispatch problem. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11123321 ↗
53. Tizhoosh, H. (2005, January 28–30). Opposition-based learning: A new scheme for machine intelligence. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control and Automation, Vienna, Austria.
54. Recent advances in differential evolution: A survey and experimental analysis10.1007/s10462-009-9137-2 ↗
55. One rank cuckoo search algorithm with application to algorithmic, trading systems optimization
56. Pierezan, J., and Coelho, L.D.S. (2018, January 27–28). Coyote optimization algorithm: A new metaheuristic for global optimization problems. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) IEEE, Busan, Korea.10.1109/CEC.2018.8477769 ↗
57. Find optimal capacity and location of distributed generation units in radial distribution networks by using enhanced coyote optimization algorithm10.1007/s00521-020-05239-1 ↗
58. A novel method based on coyote algorithm for simultaneous network reconfiguration and distribution generation placement10.1016/j.asej.2020.06.005 ↗
59. Nguyen, T.T., Pham, T.D., Kien, L.C., and Van Dai, L. (2020). Improved coyote optimization algorithm for optimally installing solar photovoltaic distribution generation units in radial distribution power systems. Complexity.10.1155/2020/1603802 ↗
60. Salp Swarm Algorithm: A bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.07.002 ↗
61. Gomes, G.F., da Cunha, S.S., and Ancelotti, A.C. (2018). A sunflower optimization (SFO) algorithm applied to damage identification on laminated composite plates. Eng. Comput., 1–8.10.1007/s00366-018-0620-8 ↗
62. Water cycle algorithm—A novel metaheuristic optimization method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.07.010 ↗
63. (2021, May 12). MATPOWER 4.1 IEEE 30-Bus, IEEE 57-Bus and 118-Bus Test System. Available online: http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower.
64. On clarifying misconceptions when comparing variants of the artificial bee colony algorithm by offering a new implementation10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.040 ↗
65. A modified differential evolution approach for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects10.1016/j.enconman.2008.08.016 ↗