Parameters, Properties, and Process: Conditional Neural Generation of Realistic SEM Imagery Toward ML-Assisted Advanced Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The research and development cycle of advanced manufacturing processes traditionally requires a large investment of time and resources. Experiments can be expensive and are hence conducted on relatively small scales. This poses problems for typically data-hungry machine learning tools which could otherwise expedite the development cycle. We build upon prior work by applying conditional generative adversarial networks (GANs) to scanning electron microscope (SEM) imagery from an emerging advanced manufacturing process, shear-assisted processing and extrusion (ShAPE). We generate realistic images conditioned on temper and either experimental parameters or material properties. In doing so, we are able to integrate machine learning into the development cycle, by allowing a user to immediately visualize the microstructure that would arise from particular process parameters or properties. This work forms a technical backbone for a fundamentally new approach for understanding manufacturing processes in the absence of first-principle models. By characterizing microstructure from a topological perspective, we are able to evaluate our models’ ability to capture the breadth and diversity of experimental scanning electron microscope (SEM) samples. Our method is successful in capturing the visual and general microstructural features arising from the considered process, with analysis highlighting directions to further improve the topological realism of our synthetic imagery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cell Image Analysis Techniques · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Image Processing Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Azimi SM, Britz D, Engstler M, Fritz M, Mücklich F (2018) Advanced steel microstructural classification by deep learning methods. Sci Rep 8(1):1–1410.1038/s41598-018-20037-5 ↗
2. Müller M, Britz D, Ulrich L, Staudt T, Mücklich F (2020) Classification of bainitic structures using textural parameters and machine learning techniques. Metals. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1005063010.3390/met10050630 ↗
3. Tsutsui K, Terasaki H, Uto K, Maemura T, Hiramatsu S, Hayashi K, Moriguchi K, Morito S (2020) A methodology of steel microstructure recognition using sem images by machine learning based on textural analysis. Mater Today Commun 25:101514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10151410.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101514 ↗
4. Durmaz AR, Müller M, Lei B, Thomas A, Britz D, Holm EA, Eberl C, Mücklich F, Gumbsch P (2021) A deep learning approach for complex microstructure inference. Nat Commun 12(1):6272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26565-510.1038/s41467-021-26565-5 ↗
5. Iyer A, Dey B, Dasgupta A, Chen W, Chakraborty A (2019) A conditional generative model for predicting material microstructures from processing methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.02133
6. Baskaran A, Kautz EJ, Chowdhary A, Ma W, Yenner B, Lewis DJ (2021) The adoption of image-driven machine learning for microstructure characterization and materials design: a perspective. JOM 73(11)10.1007/s11837-021-04805-9 ↗
7. Whalen S, Olszta M, Reza-E-Rabby M, Roosendaal T, Wang T, Herling D, Taysom BS, Suffield S, Overman N (2021) High speed manufacturing of aluminum alloy 7075 tubing by shear assisted processing and extrusion (shape). J Manuf Process 71:699–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.10.00310.1016/j.jmapro.2021.10.003 ↗
8. Whalen S, Reza-E-Rabby M, Wang T, Ma X, Roosendaal T, Herling D, Overman N, Taysom BS (2021) Shear assisted processing and extrusion of aluminum alloy 7075 tubing at high speed. In: Light metals 2021. Springer, pp 277–28010.1007/978-3-030-65396-5_41 ↗
9. Kalsar R, Ma X, Darsell J, Zhang D, Kappagantula K, Herling DR, Joshi VV (2022) Microstructure evolution, enhanced aging kinetics, and mechanical properties of aa7075 alloy after friction extrusion. Mater Sci Eng A 833:14257510.1016/j.msea.2021.142575 ↗
10. Li X, Wang T, Ma X, Overman N, Whalen S, Herling D, Kappagantula K (2022) Manufacture aluminum alloy tube from powder with a single-step extrusion via shape. J Manuf Process 80:108–11510.1016/j.jmapro.2022.05.060 ↗
11. Li X, Zhou C, Overman N, Ma X, Canfield N, Kappagantula K, Schroth J, Grant G (2021) Copper carbon composite wire with a uniform carbon dispersion made by friction extrusion. J Manuf Process 65:397–40610.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.055 ↗
12. Reza-E-Rabby M, Wang T, Canfield N, Roosendaal T, Taysom BS, Graff D, Herling D, Whalen S (2022) Effect of various post-extrusion tempering on performance of aa2024 tubes fabricated by shear assisted processing and extrusion. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 37:454–46310.1016/j.cirpj.2022.02.025 ↗
13. Darsell JT, Overman NR, Joshi VV, Whalen SA, Mathaudhu SN (2018) Shear assisted processing and extrusion (shape) of az91e flake: a study of tooling features and processing effects. J Mater Eng Perform 27(8):4150–416110.1007/s11665-018-3509-1 ↗
14. Taysom BS, Ma X, DiCiano M, Skszek T, Whalen S, et al. (2022) Fabrication of aluminum alloy 6063 tubing from secondary scrap with shear assisted processing and extrusion. In: Light metals 2022. Springer, pp 294–30010.1007/978-3-030-92529-1_41 ↗
15. Wang T, Gwalani B, Silverstein J, Darsell J, Jana S, Roosendaal T, Ortiz A, Daye W, Pelletiers T, Whalen S (2020) Microstructural assessment of a multiple-intermetallic-strengthened aluminum alloy produced from gas-atomized powder by hot extrusion and friction extrusion. Materials 13(23):533310.3390/ma13235333 ↗
16. Jiang X, Whalen SA, Darsell JT, Mathaudhu S, Overman NR (2017) Friction consolidation of gas-atomized fesi powders for soft magnetic applications. Mater Charact 123:166–17210.1016/j.matchar.2016.11.026 ↗
17. Whalen S, Overman N, Joshi V, Varga T, Graff D, Lavender C (2019) Magnesium alloy zk60 tubing made by shear assisted processing and extrusion (shape). Mater Sci Eng A 755:278–28810.1016/j.msea.2019.04.013 ↗
18. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial nets. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 27:548
19. Mirza M, Osindero S (2014) Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784
20. Odena A, Olah C, Shlens J (2017) Conditional image synthesis with auxiliary classifier GANs. In: Precup D, Teh YW (eds) Proceedings of the 34th international conference on machine learning. Proceedings of machine learning research. PMLR, vol. 70, pp 2642–2651
21. Arjovsky M, Chintala S, Bottou L (2017) Wasserstein generative adversarial networks. In: Precup D, Teh YW (eds) Proceedings of the 34th international conference on machine learning. Proceedings of machine learning research. PMLR, vol. 70, pp 214–223
22. Kantorovich LV (1939) The mathematical method of production planning and organization. Manage Sci 6(4):363–422
23. Gulrajani I, Ahmed F, Arjovsky M, Dumoulin V, Courville AC (2017) Improved training of wasserstein gans. In: Guyon I, Luxburg UV, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, Garnett R (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems. Curran Associates, Inc, New York
24. Edelsbrunner H, Letscher D, Zomorodian A (2000) Topological persistence and simplification. In: Proceedings 41st annual symposium on foundations of computer science. IEEE, pp 454–46310.1109/SFCS.2000.892133 ↗
25. Adams H, Emerson T, Kirby M, Neville R, Peterson C, Shipman P, Chepushtanova S, Hanson E, Motta F, Ziegelmeier L (2017) Persistence images: a stable vector representation of persistent homology. J Mach Learn Res 18:458
26. Emerson T, Kassab L, Howland S, Kvinge H, Kappagantula KS (2022) Toptemp: parsing precipitate structure from temper topology. In: ICLR 2022 workshop on geometrical and topological representation learning
27. Ahmad A, Khan SS, Kumar A (2018) Learning regression problems by using classifiers. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(1):945–95510.3233/JIFS-171812 ↗
28. Ammar Abbas S, Zisserman A (2019) A geometric approach to obtain a bird’s eye view from an image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision workshops, pp 0–010.1109/ICCVW.2019.00504 ↗
29. Truong L, Choin W, Wight C, Coda E, Emerson T, Kappagantula K, Kvinge H (2021) Differential property prediction: a machine learning approach to experimental design in advanced manufacturing. In: AAAI 2022 workshop on AI for design and manufacturing (ADAM)10.1007/978-3-031-22524-6_52 ↗
30. Workman S, Zhai M, Jacobs N (2016) Horizon lines in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.0212910.5244/C.30.20 ↗
31. Loshchilov I, Hutter F (2017) Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101
32. DeCost BL, Hecht MD, Francis T, Webler BA, Picard YN, Holm EA (2017) Uhcsdb: ultrahigh carbon steel micrograph database. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6(2):197–20510.1007/s40192-017-0097-0 ↗
33. Zhao S, Liu Z, Lin J, Zhu J-Y, Han S (2020) Differentiable augmentation for data-efficient gan training. In: Larochelle H, Ranzato M, Hadsell R, Balcan MF, Lin H (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems. Curran Associates Inc, New York
34. Zheng Y, Zhang Y, Zheng Z (2021) Continuous conditional generative adversarial networks (cGAN) with generator regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.14884
35. Zhao Z, Singh S, Lee H, Zhang Z, Odena A, Zhang H (2021) Improved consistency regularization for gans. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell 35(12):11033–11041
36. Li C, Xu K, Zhu J, Liu J, Zhang B (2021) Triple generative adversarial networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.312755810.1109/TPAMI.2021.3127558 ↗
37. Pearson K (1901) Liii on lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine J Sci 2(11):559–57210.1080/14786440109462720 ↗
38. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770–77810.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
39. Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, Krause J, Satheesh S, Ma S, Huang Z, Karpathy A, Khosla A, Bernstein M et al (2015) Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J Comput Vision 115(3):211–25210.1007/s11263-015-0816-y ↗