A Preliminary Study on the Adaptive SNR Threshold Method for Depth of Penetration Measurements in Diagnostic Ultrasounds
Source abstract
Abstract
Maximum depth of penetration (DOP) is among the most relevant parameters in quality assurance programs for Ultrasound (US) scanners. Nowadays, a generally-accepted protocol for DOP estimation is still awaited and, in common practice, DOP is visually assessed despite the low accuracy. To overcome the eye-based assessment subjectivity, automatic image analysis methods have been proposed in literature. The present work focuses on a novel automatic method, namely the adaptive Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) threshold method (AdSTM), developed in the MATLAB environment, by comparing it with an existing automatic approach, namely the tangent threshold method (TTM), and the mean judgment of eight observers (naked eye method). The three investigated methods were applied on data acquired from four US scanners for general purpose imaging, equipped with linear, convex, and vector array probes. Tests were carried out in two different configuration settings (raw scanner and default preset working conditions). AdSTM outcomes were tested by means of Monte Carlo Simulations. Most of measurement results were compatible despite the fact that the AdSTM seemed to be more sensitive and faster than the TTM. The results analysis confirms the higher dispersion of the naked eye method in DOP assessment with respect to the proposed automatic methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Engineering Department, Roma Tre University, via della Vasca Navale 79, 00146 Roma, Italy
Clinical Engineering Service, IRCCS Children Hospital Bambino Gesù, Piazza di Sant’Onofrio 4, 00165 Roma, Italy
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Samei, E., and Pfeiffer, D.E. (2020). Clinical ultrasonography physics: state of practice. Clinical Imaging Physics: Current and Emerging Practice, Wiley Blackwell. [1st ed.].10.1002/9781118753798 ↗
2. Real-time B-mode ultrasound quality control test procedures, Report of AAPM Ultrasound Task Group No. 110.1118/1.598404 ↗
3. Scorza, A., Orsini, F., De Marchis, C., Caramia, C., Sciuto, S.A., and Galo, J. (2018, January 11–13). A Comparative study on the influence of phantoms and test objects on quality control measurements in B-mode ultrasound systems: Preliminary results. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Rome, Italy.10.1109/MeMeA.2018.8438809 ↗
4. A computerised quality control testing system for B-mode ultrasound10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00479-3 ↗
5. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.09.006 ↗
6. Four-year experience with a clinical ultrasound quality control program10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.007 ↗
7. Comparison of ultrasound quality assurance phantom measurements from matched and mixed scanner-transducer combinations
8. Goldman, L.W., and Fowlkes, B.J. (1995). Medical CT & Ultrasound: Current Technology & Applications—AAPM Summer School 1995, American Institute of Physics.
9. Image quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging systems: Advanced B-modes10.1002/acm2.12544 ↗
10. American institute of Ultrasound in Medicine & AIUM Standards Committee (1991). Standard Methods for Measuring Performance of Pulse-Echo Ultrasound Equipment, The Institute.
11. AIUM Technical Standards Committee, Quality Assurance Subcommittee (1995). AIUM Quality Assurance Manual for Gray-Scale Ultrasound Scanners, American institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
12. An Investigation of the Relationship between In-vitro and In-vivo Ultrasound Image Quality Parameters10.1179/174227104X5016 ↗
13. Quality control of ultrasound transducers: Analysis of evaluation parameters and results of a survey of 116 transducers in a single hospital10.1007/s11547-010-0533-0 ↗
14. Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing10.12659/PJR.904135 ↗
15. Phantom-based quality assurance measurements in B-mode ultrasound
16. Early experience with automated B-mode quality assurance tests10.1177/1742271X13516896 ↗
17. (2010). Ultrasonics—Pulse-Echo Scanners—Part 2: Measurement of Maximum Depth of Penetration and Local Dynamic Range. International Standard IEC 61391-2. [1st ed.].
18. Scorza, A., Lupi, G., Sciuto, S.A., Bini, F., and Marinozzi, F. (2015, January 7–9). A novel approach to a phantom based method for maximum depth of penetration measurement in diagnostic ultrasound: A preliminary study. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Turin, Italy.10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145230 ↗
19. Implementation and validation of three automated methods for measuring ultrasound maximum depth of penetration: Application to ultrasound quality control10.1118/1.1951095 ↗
20. Breast Ultrasound Technology and Performance Evaluation of Ultrasound Equipment: B-Mode10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2619622 ↗
21. Guideline for Technical Quality Assurance (TQA) of ultrasound devices (B-mode)—Version 1.0 (July 2012): EFSUMB Technical Quality Assurance group—US-TQA/B10.1055/s-0032-1325347 ↗
22. Fiori, G., Fuiano, F., Vurchio, F., Scorza, A., Schmid, M., Conforto, S., and Sciuto, S.A. (2020, January 14–16). A preliminary study on a novel method for depth of penetration measurement in ultrasound quality assessment. Proceedings of the 24th IMEKO TC4 International Symposium & 22nd International Workshop on ADC Modelling and Testing, Palermo, Italy.
23. Increasing the number of gray shades in medical display systems—How much is enough?10.1007/s10278-006-1052-3 ↗
24. Gonzalez, R.C., and Woods, R.E. (2002). Digital Image Processing, Pearson Prentice Hall. [3rd ed.].
25. Gille, J., Arend, L., and Larimer, J.O. (2004, January 7). Display characterization by eye: Contrast ratio and discrimination throughout the grayscale. Proceedings of the SPIE 5292, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging IX, San Jose, CA, USA.10.1117/12.532521 ↗
26. CIRS Tissue Simulation & Phantom Technology (2020, September 10). Multi-Purpose Multi-Tissue Ultrasound Phantom—Model 040GSE. Available online: http://www.cirsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/040GSE-DS-032320-1.pdf.
27. Taylor, J.R. An. (1996). Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements, University Science Books. [2nd ed.].
28. A Comparative Study of the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms10.2174/1874120701509010164 ↗
29. Fiori, G., Fuiano, F., Scorza, A., Schmid, M., Conforto, S., and Sciuto, S.A. (2020, January 1–3). ECG waveforms reconstruction based on equivalent time sampling. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Bari, Italy.10.1109/MeMeA49120.2020.9137260 ↗
30. Orsini, F., Fuiano, F., Fiori, G., Scorza, A., and Sciuto, S.A. (2019, January 26–28). Temperature influence on viscosity measurements in a rheometer prototype for medical applications: A case study. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/MeMeA.2019.8802218 ↗
31. Orsini, F., Vurchio, F., Scorza, A., Crescenzi, R., and Sciuto, S.A. (2018). An Image Analysis Approach to Microgrippers Displacement Measurement and Testing. Actuators, 7.10.3390/act7040064 ↗
32. Vurchio, F., Orsini, F., Scorza, A., Fuiano, F., and Sciuto, S.A. (2020, January 1–3). A preliminary study on a novel automatic method for angular displacement measurements in microgripper for biomedical applications. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Bari, Italy.10.1109/MeMeA49120.2020.9137249 ↗
33. Fiori, G., Fuiano, F., Scorza, A., Galo, J., Conforto, S., and Sciuto, S.A. (2020, January 14–16). Lowest detectable signal in medical PW doppler quality control by means of a commercial flow phantom: A case study. Proceedings of the 24th IMEKO TC4 International Symposium & 22nd International Workshop on ADC Modelling and Testing, Palermo, Italy.