Evaluating Collapse Fragility Curves for Existing Buildings Retrofitted Using Seismic Isolation
Source abstract
Abstract
Few studies have investigated so far the collapse capacity of buildings with base-isolation. In such studies, preliminary considerations have been drawn based on a number of assumptions regarding: (i) the methodology used for assessing the collapse capacity, (ii) the collapse conditions and failure modes assumed for both superstructure and isolation system, and (iii) the numerical modeling assumptions. The main results pointed out that the collapse conditions of base-isolated buildings may occur for intensity levels slightly higher than those associated with the design earthquake. In this paper, further developments are made through the use of enhanced models for the description of the behavior of a rubber-based isolation system and the assumption of more rational collapse conditions. Collapse fragility functions, in terms of mean and dispersion values, are proposed for two archetypes representative of existing buildings retrofitted using the seismic isolation technique. The collapse margin ratio (median collapse capacity Sa,C, namely the spectral acceleration associated to a probability of exceedance equal to 50%, divided by the design spectral acceleration at the collapse prevention limit state) has been evaluated for each examined case-study. Values ranging from 1.10 to 1.45 were found.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy
Funding
Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. ATC-Applied Technology Council FEMA P-58 (2012). Next-Generation Seismic Performance Assessment for Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
2. Simplified estimation of the expected annual loss of reinforced concrete buildings
3. Seismic Collapse Safety of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. I: Assessment of Ductile Moment Frames10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000318 ↗
4. Seismic Collapse Safety of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. II: Comparative Assessment of Nonductile and Ductile Moment Frames10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000275 ↗
5. Collapse performance of seismically isolated buildings designed by the procedures of ASCE/SEI 710.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.008 ↗
6. Developing collapse fragility curves for base-isolated buildings10.1002/eqe.3126 ↗
7. RINTC Workgroup (2018). Results of the 2015–2018 Implicit Seismic Risk of Code-Conforming Structures in Italy (RINTC) Project, Rete dei Laboratori Universitari di Ingegneria Sismica (ReLUIS). ReLUIS Report.
8. Ricci, P., Manfredi, V., Noto, F., Terrenzi, M., De Risi, M.T., Di Domenico, M., Camata, G., Franchin, P., Masi, A., and Mollaioli, F. (2019, January 24–26). Rintc-e: towards seismic risk assessment of existing residential reinforced concrete buildings in Italy. Proceedings of the 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete, Greece.10.7712/120119.6939.20040 ↗
9. DM. LL. PP (2018). 17/01/2018: Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni (NTC2018), Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 42 del 20.02.2018. (In Italian).
10. OpenSees: A Framework for Earthquake Engineering Simulation10.1109/MCSE.2011.66 ↗
11. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration10.1002/eqe.495 ↗
12. Strength and stiffness reduction factors for infilled frames with openings10.1007/s11803-014-0254-9 ↗
13. An advanced numerical model of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings10.1002/eqe.2431 ↗
14. Bidirectional Modelling of High-Damping Rubber Bearings10.1080/13632460409350524 ↗
15. Modelling and Seismic Response Analysis of Italian Code-Conforming Base-Isolated Buildings10.1080/13632469.2018.1527263 ↗
16. Improved numerical analysis for ultimate behavior of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings10.1002/eqe.3123 ↗
17. An analytical hysteresis model for elastomeric seismic isolation bearings10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199702)26:2<215::AID-EQE640>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
18. Restoring capability of friction pendulum seismic isolation systems10.1007/s10518-014-9719-5 ↗
19. OpenQuake Engine: An Open Hazard (and Risk) Software for the Global Earthquake Model10.1785/0220130087 ↗
20. Seimic structural reliability of code-conforming Italian buildings10.1080/13632469.2018.1540372 ↗