journal article·2020-12

Machine Learning-Enabled Uncertainty Quantification for Modeling Structure–Property Linkages for Fatigue Critical Engineering Alloys Using an ICME Workflow

Gary Whelan, David L. McDowell

Publisher page

Abstract

Integrated computational materials engineering (ICME) facilitates efficient approaches to new material discovery and design, as well as optimization of existing materials. Computational models provide a way to rapidly screen candidate material designs such that materials can be tailored for specific applications in the product design cycle. Uncertainty is ubiquitous in ICME process–structure–property workflows; it represents a major barrier to the effective use of modeling results for high-confidence decision support in materials design and development. This work addresses microstructure statistical uncertainties, and demonstrates an approach to quantify, reduce, and propagate these uncertainties through structure–property linkages to provide robust quantification of uncertainties in output properties of interest. Further, this work demonstrates the use of Gaussian process machine learning models to significantly decrease the computational cost of the aforementioned robust uncertainty quantification.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. McDowell DL, Backman D (2011) Simulation-assisted design and accelerated insertion of materials. Comput Methods Microstruct Prop Relationsh. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0643-4_1710.1007/978-1-4419-0643-4_17 ↗
2. White A (2012) The materials genome initiative: one year on. MRS Bull 37:715–716. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2012.19410.1557/mrs.2012.194 ↗
3. McDowell DL et al (2009) Integrated design of multiscale, multifunctional materials and products. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
4. Goulding AN, Leung JF, Neu RW (2018) Communicating materials systems knowledge through processing-structure-properties-performance (PSPP) maps. Smartech
5. Ghanem R, Higdon D, Owhadi H (2017) Handbook of uncertainty quantification. Springer, New York10.1007/978-3-319-12385-1 ↗
6. Bostanabad R et al (2018) Uncertainty quantification in multiscale simulation of woven fiber composites. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 338:506–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.04.02410.1016/j.cma.2018.04.024 ↗
7. Patrone P, Kearsley A, Dienstfrey A (2018) In: 2018 AIAA non-deterministic approaches conference
8. Yeratapally SR et al (2017) Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation for validation of a microstructure sensitive model for prediction of fatigue crack initiation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 164:110–12310.1016/j.ress.2017.03.006 ↗
9. Bandyopadhyay R, Prithivirajan V, Sangid MD (2019) Uncertainty quantification in the mechanical response of crystal plasticity simulations. JOM 71:2612–262410.1007/s11837-019-03551-3 ↗
10. Bandyopadhyay R et al (2020) Microstructure-sensitive critical plastic strain energy density criterion for fatigue life prediction across various loading regimes. Proc R Soc A. 476:2019076610.1098/rspa.2019.0766 ↗
11. Kotha S, Ozturk D, Ghosh S (2020) Uncertainty-quantified parametrically homogenized constitutive models (UQ-PHCMs) for dual-phase α/β titanium alloys. NPJ Comput Mater 6:1–2010.1038/s41524-020-00379-3 ↗
12. Du X, Chen W (2002) Efficient uncertainty analysis methods for multidisciplinary robust design. AIAA J 40:545–552. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.168110.2514/2.1681 ↗
13. McDonald M, Mahadevan S (2008) Uncertainty quantification and propagation in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, p 603810.2514/6.2008-6038 ↗
14. Choi HJ, et al (2005) An inductive design exploration method for the integrated design of multi-scale materials and products. In: Proceedings of the ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Pts A and B, vol 2, pp 859–87010.1115/DETC2005-85335 ↗
15. Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2017) Uncertainty quantification in prediction of material properties during additive manufacturing. Scripta Mater 135:135–14010.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.014 ↗
16. Cai G, Mahadevan S (2016) Uncertainty quantification of manufacturing process effects on macroscale material properties. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 14:19110.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2016015552 ↗
17. Stopka KS, Whelan G, McDowell DL (2019) Microstructure-sensitive ICME workflows for fatigue critical applications10.33599/nasampe/s.19.1414 ↗
18. Whelan G, McDowell DL (2019) Uncertainty quantification in ICME workflows for fatigue critical computational modeling. Eng Fract Mech 220:10667310.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106673 ↗
19. Swiler LP, Eldred MS, Adams BM (2017) Dakota: bridging advanced scalable uncertainty quantification algorithms with production deployment. Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification. Springer, Berlin, pp 1651–169310.1007/978-3-319-12385-1_52 ↗
20. Bessa MA et al (2017) A framework for data-driven analysis of materials under uncertainty: countering the curse of dimensionality. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 320:633–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.03.03710.1016/j.cma.2017.03.037 ↗
21. Martin JD, Simpson TW (2005) Use of Kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models. AIAA J 43:853–863. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.865010.2514/1.8650 ↗
22. Hombal V, Mahadevan S (2011) Bias minimization in gaussian process surrogate modeling for uncertainty quantification. Int J Uncertain Quantif 1:321–349. https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.201100334310.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2011003343 ↗
23. Bilionis I, Zabaras N (2016) Bayesian uncertainty propagation using Gaussian processes. Handbook of uncertainty quantification. Springer, Cham, pp 1–45
24. Le Maı̂tre OP et al (2004) Uncertainty propagation using Wiener-Haar expansions. J Comput Phys 197:28–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2003.11.03310.1016/j.jcp.2003.11.033 ↗
25. Karniadakis GE (2011) Uncertainty quantification (UQ)
26. Venturi D, Cho H, Karniadakis GE (2016) Mori-Zwanzig approach to uncertainty quantification. Handbook of uncertainty quantification. Springer, Cham, pp 1–36
27. Owen N et al (2017) Comparison of surrogate-based uncertainty quantification methods for computationally expensive simulators. SIAM/ASA J Uncertain Quantif 5:403–43510.1137/15M1046812 ↗
28. Pedregosa F et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830
29. Smith M (2009) Simulia: Providence
30. Groeber MA, Jackson MA (2014) DREAM.3D: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9772-3-510.1186/2193-9772-3-5 ↗
31. Kern PC (2016) Georgia Institute of Technology
32. Smith B, Shih D, McDowell D (2018) Cyclic plasticity experiments and polycrystal plasticity modeling of three distinct Ti alloy microstructures. Int J Plast 101:1–2310.1016/j.ijplas.2013.10.004 ↗
33. Kanit T et al (2003) Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach. Int J Solids Struct 40:3647–3679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-410.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-4 ↗
34. McDowell DL (1999) Damage mechanics and metal fatigue: a discriminating perspective. Int J Damage Mech 8:376–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567895990080040610.1177/105678959900800406 ↗
35. McDowell D, Dunne F (2010) Microstructure-sensitive computational modeling of fatigue crack formation. Int J Fatigue 32:1521–154210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.003 ↗
36. Mayeur J, McDowell D (2007) A three-dimensional crystal plasticity model for duplex Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Plast 23:1457–148510.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.006 ↗
37. Zhang M, Zhang J, McDowell DL (2007) Microstructure-based crystal plasticity modeling of cyclic deformation of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Plast 23:1328–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.009 ↗
38. Przybyla CP et al (2013) Microstructure-sensitive HCF and VHCF simulations. Int J Fatigue 57:9–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.09.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.09.014 ↗
39. McDowell DL (2007) Simulation-based strategies for microstructure-sensitive fatigue modeling. Mater Sci Eng, A 468:4–1410.1016/j.msea.2006.08.129 ↗
40. Castelluccio GM, McDowell DL (2012) Assessment of small fatigue crack growth driving forces in single crystals with and without slip bands. Int J Fract 176:49–6410.1007/s10704-012-9726-y ↗
41. Fatemi A, Socie DF (1988) A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 11:149–16510.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
42. McDowell DL, Berard J-Y (1992) A δJ-based approach to biaxial fatigue. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 15:719–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1992.tb00053.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1992.tb00053.x ↗
43. Pineau A et al (2016) Failure of metals II: fatigue. Acta Mater 107:484–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.05010.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.050 ↗
44. Rovinelli A et al (2017) Assessing reliability of fatigue indicator parameters for small crack growth via a probabilistic framework. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 25:04501010.1088/1361-651X/aa6c45 ↗
45. Rovinelli A et al (2018) Predicting the 3D fatigue crack growth rate of small cracks using multimodal data via Bayesian networks: in-situ experiments and crystal plasticity simulations. J Mech Phys Solids 115:208–22910.1016/j.jmps.2018.03.007 ↗
46. Nicolas A et al (2019) Predicting fatigue crack initiation from coupled microstructure and corrosion morphology effects. Eng Fract Mech 220:10666110.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106661 ↗
47. Przybyla CP, McDowell DL (2011) Simulated microstructure-sensitive extreme value probabilities for high cycle fatigue of duplex Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Plast 27:1871–189510.1016/j.ijplas.2011.01.006 ↗
48. Castelluccio GM, McDowell DL (2014) Mesoscale modeling of microstructurally small fatigue cracks in metallic polycrystals. Mater Sci Eng, A 598:34–5510.1016/j.msea.2014.01.015 ↗
49. Castelluccio GM, McDowell DL (2015) Microstructure and mesh sensitivities of mesoscale surrogate driving force measures for transgranular fatigue cracks in polycrystals. Mater Sci Eng, A 639:626–63910.1016/j.msea.2015.05.048 ↗
50. Stopka KS, McDowell DL (2020) Microstructure-sensitive computational estimates of driving forces for surface versus subsurface fatigue crack formation in Duplex Ti–6Al–4V and Al 7075-T6. JOM 72:28–3810.1007/s11837-019-03804-1 ↗
51. Möller B, Beer M (2008) Engineering computation under uncertainty–capabilities of non-traditional models. Comput Struct 86:1024–104110.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.041 ↗
52. Rasmussen CE (2004) Gaussian processes in machine learning. Advanced lectures on machine learning. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–7110.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_4 ↗
53. Sen I et al (2007) Microstructural effects on the mechanical behavior of B-modified Ti–6Al–4V alloys. Acta Mater 55:4983–499310.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.009 ↗
54. Roy S et al (2011) Development of solidification microstructure in boron-modified alloy Ti–6Al–4V–0.1B. Acta Mater 59:5494–551010.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.023 ↗
55. Attallah M et al (2009) Comparative determination of the α/β phase fraction in α + β-titanium alloys using X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy. Mater Charact 60:1248–125610.1016/j.matchar.2009.05.006 ↗
56. Collins PC et al (2009) Development of methods for the quantification of microstructural features in α + β-processed α/β titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng, A 508:174–18210.1016/j.msea.2008.12.038 ↗
57. Lütjering G (1998) Influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of (α + β) titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng, A 243:32–4510.1016/S0921-5093(97)00778-8 ↗
58. Wang YC, Langdon TG (2013) Influence of phase volume fractions on the processing of a Ti–6Al–4V alloy by high-pressure torsion. Mater Sci Eng, A 559:861–86710.1016/j.msea.2012.09.034 ↗