PRISMS-Indentation: Multi-scale Elasto-Plastic Virtual Indentation Module
Source abstract
Abstract
Indentation testing has played a major role for many materials design processes as a convenient and relatively cheap experiment. However, extracting the data from indentation tests requires complex post-processing or an integrated simulation and experiment framework. Accordingly, the simulation of indentation has become a post-processing routine for indentation tests. Providing a highly efficient, computationally scalable, and open-source platform for indentation simulation provides invaluable machinery for materials design process. An open-source PRISMS-Indentation module is presented here as a multi-scale elasto-plastic virtual indentation framework. The module is implemented as a part of PRISMS-Plasticity software which covers length scales of macroscopic plasticity and crystal plasticity. The contact problem is handled using a primal–dual active set method. The framework is first tested against analytical solution of Hertzian theory for contact using an isotropic elasticity model. The robustness of the framework is then investigated in simulations of indentation of annealed Cu microstructures. Unstructured meshes with hexahedral elements and variable mesh density are used to demonstrate potential for speedup in indentation simulations.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Gouldstone A et al (2007) Indentation across size scales and disciplines: recent developments in experimentation and modeling. Acta Mater 55(12):4015–403910.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.044 ↗
2. Hintsala ED, Hangen U, Stauffer DD (2018) High-throughput nanoindentation for statistical and spatial property determination. JOM 70(4):494–50310.1007/s11837-018-2752-0 ↗
3. Wen Y et al (2019) Nanoindentation characterization on local plastic response of Ti-6Al-4V under high-load spherical indentation. J Market Res 8(4):3434–3442
4. Besharatloo H, Wheeler JM (2021) Influence of indentation size and spacing on statistical phase analysis via high-speed nanoindentation mapping of metal alloys. J Mater Res 36(11):2198–221210.1557/s43578-021-00214-5 ↗
5. Alcalá J, Esqué-de los Ojos D (2010) Reassessing spherical indentation: contact regimes and mechanical property extractions. Int J Solids Struct 47(20):2714–273210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.025 ↗
6. Beghini M, Bertini L, Fontanari V (2006) Evaluation of the stress–strain curve of metallic materials by spherical indentation. Int J Solids Struct 43(7–8):2441–245910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.068 ↗
7. Cao Y, Qian X, Huber N (2007) Spherical indentation into elastoplastic materials: indentation-response based definitions of the representative strain. Mater Sci Eng A 454:1–1310.1016/j.msea.2007.01.002 ↗
8. Donohue BR, Ambrus A, Kalidindi SR (2012) Critical evaluation of the indentation data analyses methods for the extraction of isotropic uniaxial mechanical properties using finite element models. Acta Mater 60(9):3943–395210.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.034 ↗
9. Fernandez-Zelaia P et al (2018) Estimating mechanical properties from spherical indentation using Bayesian approaches. Mater Des 147:92–10510.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.037 ↗
10. Campbell JE et al (2021) A critical appraisal of the instrumented indentation technique and profilometry-based inverse finite element method indentation plastometry for obtaining stress-strain curves. Adv Eng Mater 23(5):200149610.1002/adem.202001496 ↗
11. Tang YT et al (2021) Profilometry-based indentation plastometry to obtain stress-strain curves from anisotropic superalloy components made by additive manufacturing. Materialia 15:10101710.1016/j.mtla.2021.101017 ↗
12. Clyne TW et al (2021) Profilometry-based inverse finite element method indentation plastometry. Adv Eng Mater 23(9):210043710.1002/adem.202100437 ↗
13. Kelchner CL, Plimpton SJ, Hamilton JC (1998) Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys Rev B 58(17):1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
14. Yaghoobi M, Voyiadjis GZ (2014) Effect of boundary conditions on the MD simulation of nanoindentation. Comput Mater Sci 95:626–63610.1016/j.commatsci.2014.08.013 ↗
15. Voyiadjis GZ, Yaghoobi M (2015) Large scale atomistic simulation of size effects during nanoindentation: dislocation length and hardness. Mater Sci Eng A 634:20–3110.1016/j.msea.2015.03.024 ↗
16. Yaghoobi M, Voyiadjis GZ (2016) Atomistic simulation of size effects in single-crystalline metals of confined volumes during nanoindentation. Comput Mater Sci 111:64–7310.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.004 ↗
17. Voyiadjis GZ, Yaghoobi M (2017) Review of nanoindentation size effect: experiments and atomistic simulation. Crystals 7(10):32110.3390/cryst7100321 ↗
18. Zaafarani N et al (2006) Three-dimensional investigation of the texture and microstructure below a nanoindent in a Cu single crystal using 3D EBSD and crystal plasticity finite element simulations. Acta Mater 54(7):1863–187610.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.014 ↗
19. Casals O, Očenášek J, Alcala J (2007) Crystal plasticity finite element simulations of pyramidal indentation in copper single crystals. Acta Mater 55(1):55–6810.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.018 ↗
20. Alcala J, Casals O, Očenášek J (2008) Micromechanics of pyramidal indentation in fcc metals: single crystal plasticity finite element analysis. J Mech Phys Solids 56(11):3277–330310.1016/j.jmps.2008.07.004 ↗
21. Britton TB et al (2010) The effect of crystal orientation on the indentation response of commercially pure titanium: experiments and simulations. Proc R Soci A Math Phys Eng Sci 466(2115):695–719
22. Eidel B (2011) Crystal plasticity finite-element analysis versus experimental results of pyramidal indentation into (0 0 1) fcc single crystal. Acta Mater 59(4):1761–177110.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.042 ↗
23. Sabnis PA et al (2013) Crystal plasticity analysis of cylindrical indentation on a Ni-base single crystal superalloy. Int J Plast 51:200–21710.1016/j.ijplas.2013.05.004 ↗
24. Xiao X et al (2019) Modelling nano-indentation of ion-irradiated FCC single crystals by strain-gradient crystal plasticity theory. Int J Plast 116:216–23110.1016/j.ijplas.2019.01.005 ↗
25. Cheng J et al (2021) Experiment and non-local crystal plasticity finite element study of nanoindentation on Al-8Ce-10Mg alloy. Int J Solids Struct 233:11123310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111233 ↗
26. Li L et al (2013) Three-dimensional crystal plasticity finite element simulation of nanoindentation on aluminium alloy 2024. Mater Sci Eng A 579:41–4910.1016/j.msea.2013.05.009 ↗
27. Bhattacharya AK, Nix WD (1988) Finite element simulation of indentation experiments. Int J Solids Struct 24(9):881–89110.1016/0020-7683(88)90039-X ↗
28. Kang JJ, Becker AA, Sun W (2012) Determining elastic–plastic properties from indentation data obtained from finite element simulations and experimental results. Int J Mech Sci 62(1):34–4610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.05.011 ↗
29. Min L et al (2004) A numerical study of indentation using indenters of different geometry. J Mater Res 19(1):73–7810.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.73 ↗
30. Popp A, Wriggers P (2018) Contact modeling for solids and particles, vol 585. Springer, Cham10.1007/978-3-319-90155-8 ↗
31. Belgacem FB, Hild P, Laborde P (1998) The mortar finite element method for contact problems. Math Comput Model 28(4–8):263–27110.1016/S0895-7177(98)00121-6 ↗
32. McDevitt TW, Laursen TA (2000) A mortar-finite element formulation for frictional contact problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 48(10):1525–154710.1002/1097-0207(20000810)48:10<1525::AID-NME953>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
33. Wohlmuth BI (2000) A mortar finite element method using dual spaces for the Lagrange multiplier. SIAM J Numer Anal 38(3):989–101210.1137/S0036142999350929 ↗
34. Puso MA, Laursen TA (2004) A mortar segment-to-segment contact method for large deformation solid mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(6–8):601–62910.1016/j.cma.2003.10.010 ↗
35. Hüeber S, Wohlmuth BI (2005) A primal–dual active set strategy for non-linear multibody contact problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(27–29):3147–316610.1016/j.cma.2004.08.006 ↗
36. Brunßen S et al (2007) A fast and robust iterative solver for nonlinear contact problems using a primal-dual active set strategy and algebraic multigrid. Int J Numer Methods Eng 69(3):524–54310.1002/nme.1779 ↗
37. Frohne J, Heister T, Bangerth W (2016) Efficient numerical methods for the large-scale, parallel solution of elastoplastic contact problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 105(6):416–43910.1002/nme.4977 ↗
38. Popp A, Gee MW, Wall WA (2011) Finite deformation contact based on a 3D dual mortar and semi-smooth newton approach. In: Trends in computational contact mechanics, pp. 57–77.10.1007/978-3-642-22167-5_4 ↗
39. Popp A, Gee MW, Wall WA (2009) A finite deformation mortar contact formulation using a primal–dual active set strategy. Int J Numer Meth Eng 79(11):1354–139110.1002/nme.2614 ↗
40. Seitz A, Popp A, Wall WA (2015) A semi-smooth Newton method for orthotropic plasticity and frictional contact at finite strains. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 285:228–25410.1016/j.cma.2014.11.003 ↗
41. Yaghoobi M, Allison JE, Sundararaghavan V (2020) Multiscale modeling of twinning and detwinning behavior of HCP polycrystals. Int J Plast 127:10265310.1016/j.ijplas.2019.102653 ↗
42. Yaghoobi M et al (2021) Crystal plasticity finite element modeling of extension twinning in WE43 Mg alloys: calibration and validation. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10(3):488–50710.1007/s40192-021-00229-0 ↗
43. Yaghoobi M et al (2022) Deformation twinning and detwinning in extruded Mg-4Al: in-situ experiment and crystal plasticity simulation. Int J Plast 155:10334510.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103345 ↗
44. Chen Z et al (2022) The effects of microstructure on deformation twinning in Mg WE43. Mater Sci Eng A 859:14418910.1016/j.msea.2022.144189 ↗
45. Ganesan S et al (2021) The effects of heat treatment on the response of WE43 Mg alloy: crystal plasticity finite element simulation and SEM-DIC experiment. Int J Plast 137:10291710.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102917 ↗
46. Lakshmanan A et al (2022) Crystal plasticity finite element modeling of grain size and morphology effects on yield strength and extreme value fatigue response. J Mark Res 19:3337–3354
47. Yaghoobi M, Allison JE, Sundararaghavan V (2022) PRISMS-plasticity TM: an open-source rapid texture evolution analysis pipeline. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-022-00275-210.1007/s40192-022-00275-2 ↗
48. Yaghoobi M et al (2021) PRISMS-fatigue computational framework for fatigue analysis in polycrystalline metals and alloys. npj Comput. Mater. 7(1):1–1210.1038/s41524-021-00506-8 ↗
49. Stopka KS et al (2021) Effects of boundary conditions on microstructure-sensitive fatigue crystal plasticity analysis. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10(3):393–41210.1007/s40192-021-00219-2 ↗
50. Stopka KS et al (2022) Simulated effects of sample size and grain neighborhood on the modeling of extreme value fatigue response. Acta Mater 224:11752410.1016/j.actamat.2021.117524 ↗
51. Stopka KS et al (2023) Microstructure-Sensitive modeling of surface roughness and notch effects on extreme value fatigue response. Int J Fatigue 166:10729510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107295 ↗
52. Yaghoobi M et al (2023) Effect of sample size on the maximum value distribution of fatigue driving forces in metals and alloys. Int J Fatigue 176:10785310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107853 ↗
53. Yaghoobi M et al (2019) PRISMS-plasticity: an open-source crystal plasticity finite element software. Comput Mater Sci 169:10907810.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109078 ↗
54. Abhyankar S et al. (2018) PETSc/TS: a modern scalable ODE/DAE solver library. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01437
55. Arndt D et al (2021) The deal. II finite element library: design, features, and insights. Comput Math Appl 81:407–42210.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.022 ↗
56. Ahrens J et al (2005) 36-paraview: an end-user tool for large-data visualization. Vis Handb 717:50038–50041
57. Johnson KL (1987) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
58. Fischer-Cripps AC (1999) The Hertzian contact surface. J Mater Sci 34(1):129–13710.1023/A:1004490230078 ↗
59. Groeber MA, Jackson MA (2014) DREAM 3D: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3(1):56–7210.1186/2193-9772-3-5 ↗
60. Bronkhorst CA, Kalidindi SR, Anand L (1992) Polycrystalline plasticity and the evolution of crystallographic texture in FCC metals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Phys Eng Sci 341(1662):443–47710.1098/rsta.1992.0111 ↗
61. Anand L, Kothari M (1996) A computational procedure for rate-independent crystal plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 44(4):525–55810.1016/0022-5096(96)00001-4 ↗
62. Ostoja-Starzewski M (2006) Material spatial randomness: from statistical to representative volume element. Probab Eng Mech 21(2):112–13210.1016/j.probengmech.2005.07.007 ↗
63. Voyiadjis G, Yaghoobi M (2019) Size effects in plasticity: from macro to nano. Academic Press, Cambridge