journal article·2024-08-30Open access

Leveraging LLMs for Efficient Topic Reviews

Bady Gana, Andrés Leiva-Araos, Héctor Allende-Cid, José García

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 17

Abstract

This paper presents the topic review (TR), a novel semi-automatic framework designed to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of literature reviews. By leveraging the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), TR addresses the inefficiencies and error-proneness of traditional review methods, especially in rapidly evolving fields. The framework significantly improves literature review processes by integrating advanced text mining and machine learning techniques. Through a case study approach, TR offers a step-by-step methodology that begins with query generation and refinement, followed by semi-automated text mining to identify relevant articles. LLMs are then employed to extract and categorize key themes and concepts, facilitating an in-depth literature analysis. This approach demonstrates the transformative potential of natural language processing in literature reviews. With an average similarity of 69.56% between generated and indexed keywords, TR effectively manages the growing volume of scientific publications, providing researchers with robust strategies for complex text synthesis and advancing knowledge in various domains. An expert analysis highlights a positive Fleiss’ Kappa score, underscoring the significance and interpretability of the results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topic Modeling · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques · Expert finding and Q&A systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Escuela de Ingeniería Informática, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Avenida Brasil 2241, Valparaíso 2362807, Chile

Instituto de Data Science, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Desarrollo, Av. La Plaza 680, Las Condes, Santiago 7610615, Chile

Knowledge Discovery, Fraunhofer-Institut für Intelligente Analyse- und Informationssysteme (IAIS), Schloss Birlinghoven 1, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany

Lamarr Institute for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, 53115 Dortmund, Germany

Escuela de Ingeniería en Construcción y Transporte, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Av. Brasil 2147, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile

Funding

National Agency for Research and Development (ANID)/Scholarship Program/DOCTORADO NACIONAL · Beca INF-PUCV · VINCI-DI

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Sundaram, G., and Berleant, D. (2023, January 20–23). Automating systematic literature reviews with natural language processing and text mining: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, London, UK.10.1007/978-981-99-3243-6_7 ↗
2. Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature10.1007/s00607-023-01181-x ↗
3. A novel application of machine learning and zero-shot classification methods for automated abstract screening in systematic reviews10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100162 ↗
4. Automatic text classification to support systematic reviews in medicine10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.047 ↗
5. Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learning models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature10.1007/s11192-010-0160-5 ↗
6. Deep learning in citation recommendation models survey10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113790 ↗
7. Understanding the elephant: The discourse approach to boundary identification and corpus construction for theory review articles
8. A meta-analysis of semantic classification of citations10.1162/qss_a_00159 ↗
9. Information extraction from scientific articles: A survey10.1007/s11192-018-2921-5 ↗
10. Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews10.1177/02683962211048201 ↗
11. Computational literature reviews: Method, algorithms, and roadmap10.1177/1094428121991230 ↗
12. A roadmap toward the automatic composition of systematic literature reviews10.47909/ijsmc.52 ↗
13. Tauchert, C., Bender, M., Mesbah, N., and Buxmann, P. (2020, January 7–10). Towards an Integrative Approach for Automated Literature Reviews Using Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2020, Maui, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2020.095 ↗
14. Grootendorst, M. (2022). BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv.
15. Machine learning techniques applied to construction: A hybrid bibliometric analysis of advances and future directions10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104532 ↗
16. Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis10.1023/A:1007617005950 ↗
17. Latent dirichlet allocation
18. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization10.1038/44565 ↗
19. Arora, S., Ge, R., and Moitra, A. (2012, January 20–23). Learning topic models–going beyond SVD. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.10.1109/FOCS.2012.49 ↗
20. Towards semantic-driven boolean query formalization for biomedical systematic literature reviews10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104928 ↗
21. Scells, H., Forbes, C., Clark, J., Koopman, B., and Zuccon, G. (2022, January 11–12). The Impact of Query Refinement on Systematic Review Literature Search: A Query Log Analysis. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, Madrid, Spain.10.1145/3539813.3545143 ↗
22. Investigation of text-mining methodologies to aid the construction of search strategies in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy—A case study10.1002/jrsm.1593 ↗
23. A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools10.1002/jrsm.1665 ↗
24. PROTOCOL: Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: An assessment of current methods10.1002/cl2.1208 ↗
25. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗
26. Data sampling and supervised learning for HIV literature screening10.1109/TNB.2016.2565481 ↗
27. Norman12, C., Leeflang, M., and Névéol, A. (2019, January 9–12). LIMSI@CLEF ehealth 2017 task 2: Logistic regression for automatic article ranking. Proceedings of the CEUR Workshop Proceedings: Working Notes of CLEF 2019: Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum, Lugano, Switzerland.
28. Norman, C.R., Leeflang, M.M., and Névéol, A. (2018, January 10–14). LIMSI@CLEF eHealth 2018 Task 2: Technology Assisted Reviews by Stacking Active and Static Learning. Proceedings of the CLEF 2018—Working Notes of CLEF 2018 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum, Avignon, France.
29. Automatic classification of literature in systematic reviews on food safety using machine learning10.1016/j.crfs.2021.12.010 ↗
30. Torii, M., and Liu, H. (2007). Classifier Ensemble for Biomedical Document Retrieval. LBM (Short Papers), CEUR-WS.
31. Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.010 ↗
32. Tsubota, T., Bollegala, D., Zhao, Y., Jin, Y., and Kozu, T. (2022). Improvement of intervention information detection for automated clinical literature screening during systematic review. J. Biomed. Inform., 134.10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104185 ↗
33. An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews10.1038/s42256-020-00287-7 ↗
34. Unraveling the landscape of large language models: A systematic review and future perspectives10.1108/JEBDE-08-2023-0015 ↗
35. Modeling new trends in bone regeneration, using the BERTopic approach10.2217/rme-2023-0096 ↗
36. Chen, W., Rabhi, F., Liao, W., and Al-Qudah, I. (2023). Leveraging State-of-the-Art Topic Modeling for News Impact Analysis on Financial Markets: A Comparative Study. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12122605 ↗
37. Wang, Z., Chen, J., Chen, J., and Chen, H. (2023). Identifying interdisciplinary topics and their evolution based on BERTopic. Scientometrics, Springer.10.1007/s11192-023-04776-5 ↗
38. Gan, L., Yang, T., Huang, Y., Yang, B., Luo, Y.Y., Richard, L.W.C., and Guo, D. (2023). Experimental Comparison of Three Topic Modeling Methods with LDA, Top2Vec and BERTopic. Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium, ISAIR 2023, Beijing, China, 21–23 October 2023, Springer.10.1007/978-981-99-9109-9_37 ↗
39. Xiao, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, P., and Muennighoff, N. (2023). C-Pack: Packaged Resources to Advance General Chinese Embedding. arXiv.
40. Kim, D., Park, C., Kim, S., Lee, W., Song, W., Kim, Y., Kim, H., Kim, Y., Lee, H., and Kim, J. (2023). SOLAR 10.7 B: Scaling Large Language Models with Simple yet Effective Depth Up-Scaling. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-industry.3 ↗
41. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., and Dean, J. (2013, January 2–4). Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. Proceedings of the Workshop at ICLR, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
42. Pennington, J., Socher, R., and Manning, C.D. (2014, January 25–29). Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation. Proceedings of the EMNLP, Doha, Qatar.10.3115/v1/D14-1162 ↗
43. Muennighoff, N., Tazi, N., Magne, L., and Reimers, N. (2022). MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.148 ↗
44. Muennighoff, N. (2022). SGPT: GPT Sentence Embeddings for Semantic Search. arXiv.
45. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction10.21105/joss.00861 ↗
46. Visualizing data using t-SNE
47. Tang, J., Liu, J., Zhang, M., and Mei, Q. (2016). Visualizing Large-scale and High-dimensional Data. WWW ’16, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, Montréal, QC, Canada, 11–15 April 2016, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.10.1145/2872427.2883041 ↗
48. Density-Based Clustering Based on Hierarchical Density Estimates
49. Allaoui, M., Kherfi, M.L., and Cheriet, A. (2020). Considerably Improving Clustering Algorithms Using UMAP Dimensionality Reduction Technique: A Comparative Study, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-51935-3_34 ↗
50. García, J., Leiva-Araos, A., Diaz-Saavedra, E., Moraga, P., Pinto, H., and Yepes, V. (2023). Relevance of Machine Learning Techniques in Water Infrastructure Integrity and Quality: A Review Powered by Natural Language Processing. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132212497 ↗
51. Asyaky, M.S., and Mandala, R. (2021, January 29–30). Improving the Performance of HDBSCAN on Short Text Clustering by Using Word Embedding and UMAP. Proceedings of the 2021 8th International Conference on Advanced Informatics: Concepts, Theory and Applications (ICAICTA), Bandung, Indonesia.10.1109/ICAICTA53211.2021.9640285 ↗
52. Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information10.1162/tacl_a_00051 ↗
53. Färber, M., and Steyer, A. (2021). Towards Full-Fledged Argument Search: A Framework for Extracting and Clustering Arguments from Unstructured Text. arXiv.
54. David, U., and Karabatak, M. (2022, January 6–7). Text Clustering of COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets. Proceedings of the 2022 10th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS), Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/ISDFS55398.2022.9800754 ↗
55. Gelar, T., and Sari, A.N. (2024, January 20–22). Bertopic and NER Stop Words for Topic Modeling on Agricultural Instructional Sentences. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Engineering Science 2023 (iCAST-ES 2023), Tarakan, Indonesia.10.2991/978-94-6463-364-1_14 ↗
56. Dettmers, T., Pagnoni, A., Holtzman, A., and Zettlemoyer, L. (2023). QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs. arXiv.
57. Brown, T.B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., and Askell, A. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv.
58. Grootendorst, M. (2023, November 28). KeyBERT: Minimal Keyword Extraction with BERT. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/8388690.
59. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data10.2307/2529310 ↗
60. Gana Castillo, B.P. (2024, August 19). Leveraging LLMs for Efficient Topic Reviews. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/13346401.
61. Gana Castillo, B. (2024, August 19). Topic-Modeling-BERTopic-SOLAR. Available online: https://github.com/Zickbad/Topic-modeling-BERTopic-SOLAR.