The Influence of AR on Purchase Intentions of Cultural Heritage Products: The TAM and Flow-Based Study
Source abstract
Abstract
AR integrates virtual elements with the real world in real-time to enhance interactivity and vividness, which may influence consumers’ perceptions and payment intentions. This study explores the impact of Augmented Reality (AR) on consumer willingness to pay for cultural heritage products, utilizing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and flow theory. This study analyzes 603 responses (quantitative data) to understand consumer perceptions of AR in the purchasing process of cultural heritage products. The findings reveal that perceived usefulness, ease of use, and flow experience significantly enhance consumer purchase intentions, with ease of use also amplifying the effects of perceived usefulness and flow experience. Additionally, the immersive, interactive, and aesthetic aspects of AR contribute positively to ease of use and flow experiences, with immersion notably impacting perceived usefulness. The results support the research model with robust explanatory power, offering practical insights for employing AR to improve marketability and consumer engagement with cultural heritage products. This paper contributes to the existing literature by bridging the gap in understanding the role of AR in enhancing consumer experiences and financial outcomes in the cultural heritage domain.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Augmented Reality Applications · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
International Design School for Advanced Studies, Hongik University, Seoul 04068, Republic of Korea
Department of Design Innovation (Visual Communication Design), Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Augmented reality: A comprehensive review10.1007/s11831-022-09831-7 ↗
2. A survey of augmented reality10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 ↗
3. Use of augmented reality in the usability evaluation of products10.3233/WOR-2012-0298-1164 ↗
4. The role of augmented reality for sustainable development: Evidence from cultural heritage tourism
5. Barriers for the adoption of augmented reality business model in the Indian handloom industry
6. Is augmented reality technology an effective tool for e-commerce? An interactivity and vividness perspective10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001 ↗
7. Pine, B.J., and James, H. (2011). Gilmore. The Experience Economy, Harvard Business Press.
8. The role of augmented reality for experience-influenced environments: The case of cultural heritage tourism in Korea10.1177/0047287517708255 ↗
9. Consumer purchase intention of intangible cultural heritage product (ICHP): Effects of cultural identity, consumer knowledge and manufacture type10.1108/APJML-11-2021-0831 ↗
10. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology10.2307/249008 ↗
11. The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium
12. Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predictiing Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs.
13. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 ↗
14. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 ↗
15. Wang, S., Chen, S., and Nah, K. (2024). Exploring the Mechanisms Influencing Users’ Willingness to Pay for Green Real Estate Projects in Asia Based on Technology Acceptance Modeling Theory. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14020349 ↗
16. Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Harper & Row.
17. The concept of flow
18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety, Jossey-Bass.10.1037/10516-164 ↗
19. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., and Nakamura, J. (2014). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8 ↗
20. ‘It’s an illusion, but it looks real!’Consumer affective, cognitive and behavioural responses to augmented reality applications10.1080/0267257X.2016.1174726 ↗
21. Blending the real world and the virtual world: Exploring the role of flow in augmented reality experiences10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.041 ↗
22. Effects of mixed-reality on players’ behaviour and immersion in a cultural tourism game: A cognitive processing perspective10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.02.003 ↗
23. Immersion in computer games: The role of spatial presence and flow10.1155/2011/282345 ↗
24. Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of its media characteristics on consumer behaviour10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.02.004 ↗
25. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004 ↗
26. Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., and Kelly, K. (2008). New Media: A Critical Introduction, Routledge.10.4324/9780203884829 ↗
27. Determinants of perceived web site interactivity10.1509/jmkg.72.2.99 ↗
28. Collaborative augmented reality10.1145/514236.514265 ↗
29. Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions10.1177/14614440022225751 ↗
30. Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers’ decision making and preferences10.1086/314322 ↗
31. Interactivity in brand web sites: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience10.1016/j.intmar.2011.11.002 ↗
32. Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.003 ↗
33. Working towards defining an aesthetics of augmented reality: A Medium Transition10.1177/1354856513514333 ↗
34. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations10.1177/002224299606000304 ↗
35. A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: The moderating role of cognitive innovativeness10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2 ↗
36. The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.018 ↗
37. Online consumer behaviour and its relationship to website atmospheric induced flow: Insights into online travel agencies in China10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.01.001 ↗
38. Destination marketing organization website visitors’ flow experience: An application of Plog’s model of personality10.1080/10548408.2017.1358234 ↗
39. Functional anatomy of spatial mental imagery generated from verbal instructions10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-20-06504.1996 ↗
40. Creating commercially compelling website-service encounters: An examination of the effect of website-service interface performance components on flow experiences10.1007/s12525-011-0073-z ↗
41. Online visual merchandising (VMD) cues and consumer pleasure and arousal: Purchasing versus browsing situation10.1002/mar.20324 ↗
42. Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.032 ↗
43. How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.010 ↗
44. Adoption of virtual try-on technology for online apparel shopping10.1002/dir.20113 ↗
45. Augmented reality in smart retailing: A (n)(A) Symmetric Approach to continuous intention to use retail brands’ mobile AR apps10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102464 ↗
46. Why smartphone advertising attracts customers: A model of Web advertising, flow, and personalization10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.015 ↗
47. How does immersion work in augmented reality games? A user-centric view of immersion and engagement. Inform
48. Wang, S., and Nah, K. (2024). Exploring Sustainable Learning Intentions of Employees Using Online Learning Modules of Office Apps Based on User Experience Factors: Using the Adapted UTAUT Model. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14114746 ↗
49. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 ↗
50. Towards understanding members’ interactivity, trust, and flow in online travel community10.1108/02635570510616120 ↗
51. Kerlinger, F.N. (1966). Foundations of Behavioral Research, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
52. Sensory enabling technology acceptance model (SE-TAM): A multiple-group structural model comparison10.1002/mar.20245 ↗
53. Consumer behavior in an augmented reality environment: Exploring the effects of flow via augmented realism and technology fluidity10.1016/j.tele.2022.101833 ↗
54. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys10.1177/002224377701400320 ↗
55. Byrne, B.M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Routledge.10.4324/9780203807644 ↗
56. Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x ↗
57. A method for comparing completely standardized solutions in multiple groups10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_9 ↗
58. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 ↗
59. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 ↗
60. Kline, R.B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guilford Publications.
61. Schumacker, R.E., and Lomax, R.G. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, Psychology Press.10.4324/9781410610904 ↗
62. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 ↗
63. An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity10.1177/1094428120968614 ↗
64. Hair Jr, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N.P., and Ray, S. (2021). An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 ↗
65. Hair, J.F. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis, Kennesaw State University.
66. Intention to reuse AR-based apps: The combined role of the sense of immersion, product presence and perceived realism10.1016/j.im.2021.103453 ↗
67. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2 ↗
68. Effects of perceived interactivity of augmented reality on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101912 ↗
69. Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.068 ↗
70. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014 ↗
71. Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey10.1089/109493101300117884 ↗