journal article·2010-07-01

Towards automatic flaw sizing using ultrasonic time-of-flight diffraction

A Al-Ataby, W Al-Nuaimy, O Zahran

Publisher page

Abstract

Despite the recent popularity of ultrasonic time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) as a reliable non-destructive testing technique for the inspection of weld defects in steel structures, the critical stages of data processing and interpretation are still performed offline manually. This depends heavily on the skill, experience, alertness and consistency of a trained operator. The TOFD data acquisition and display configurations themselves may introduce a host of errors that cannot be accounted for by manual interpretation. This paper presents techniques developed for the automatic sizing and positioning of weld flaws in TOFD data as an essential stage in a comprehensive TOFD inspection and interpretation system to aid the operator by automating the processing and interpretation. Data manipulation and post-processing techniques have been specifically developed for the automatic detection and sizing of weld defects in TOFD data, significantly reducing the sizing and positioning errors. The system is designed to function autonomously without the need for user intervention, relying instead on information derived from the raw data and the data acquisition parameters. This defect sizing process generates, in near real-time, a quality appraisal of a scanned weld, detailing the location and dimensions of all detected flaws. The results achieved so far have been promising in terms of accuracy, consistency and reliability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (7)

Show source-provided references
1. M G Silk, `Defect sizing using ultrasonic diffraction', British Journal of NDT, pp 12-15, January 1979.
2. W Al-Nuaimy and O Zahran, `Time-of-flight diffraction - from semi-automatic inspection to semi-automatic interpretation', Insight, Vol 47, No 10, pp 639-644, October 2005.10.1784/insi.2005.47.10.639 ↗
3. J Charlesworth and J Temple, Engineering applications of ultrasonic time-of flight diffraction, RSP, 2nd edition, 2001.
4. N Trimborn, `The time-of-flight diffraction technique', UTonline (www.ndt.net/article/tofd/trimborn/trimborn.htm), 2(9), September 1997.
5. British Standards Institution, Guide to calibration and setting up of the ultrasonic time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) technique for the detection, location and sizing of flaws. BS 7706, December 1993.
6. O Zahran and W Al-Nuaimy, `Automatic data processing and defect detection in time-of-flight diffraction images using statistical techniques', Insight, Vol 47, No 9, pp 538-542, September 2005.10.1784/insi.2005.47.9.538 ↗
7. M G Silk, `An evaluation of the performance of the TOFD technique as a means of sizing flaws, with particular reference to flaws with curved profiles', Insight, Vol 38, No 4, pp 280-287, April 1996.