Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimization of the Rate of Penetration and Mechanical Specific Energy: A Case Study Applied to a Carbonate Hard Rock Reservoir Based on a Drill Rate Test Using Play-Back Methodology
Source abstract
Abstract
Until early 2006, in Brazil, the focus used to be on oil and gas exploration/exploitation of post-salt carbonates. This changed when the industry announced the existence of large fields in pre-salt layers across the South Atlantic Ocean from nearshore zones up to almost 350 [km] from the shore. With the discovery of pre-salt hydrocarbons reservoirs, new challenges appeared. One of the main challenges is the necessity to optimize the drilling processes due to their high operational costs. Drilling costs are considerably high, which leads the oil and gas industry to search for innovative and entrepreneurial methods. The coupling of the mechanical specific energy (MSE) and the rate of penetration (ROP) is a method that allows for the identification of ideal conditions to efficiently enhance the drilling process. In addition, the performance of the drilling process can be estimated through pre-operational tests, which consist in continuously testing the applied drilling mechanic parameters, such as the weight-on-bit (WOB) and drill string rotary speed (RPM), looking for optimum sets that would ultimately provide the most desirable ROP. Thus, the goal of this research was to analyze field data from pre-salt layer operations, using a multi-objective optimization based on the play-back methodology for pre-operational drilling tests, through the ideal combination of the highest ROP and the lowest MSE. The results showed that the new concept of pre-operational tests based on the MSE proved to be effective in the drilling process optimization. The combination of the highest ROP and the lowest MSE allows for a high-performance drilling process. For WOB intervals of 5 and 7 [klb], a good fit of the parameters was obtained. Through the parameters obtained from pre-operational tests, the eventual cost-saving and time-saving values could be estimated, respectively, ranging from USD 1,056,180 to 1,151,898 and 19.50 to 21.27 [h], respectively. In addition, the results of this research can be applied to the exploration of other natural resources, such as natural hydrogen and geothermal sources.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate Program in Engineering, São Paulo State University, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, SP, Brazil
Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Itajubá, Itajubá 37500-903, MG, Brazil
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES) · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) · Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP) · Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (MCTI)
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Comparison of accuracy and computational performance between the machine learning algorithms for rate of penetration in directional drilling well
2. Mineralogy based classification of carbonate rocks using elastic parameters: A case study from Buzios Field10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109962 ↗
3. Enhanced oil recovery with carbon dioxide geosequestration: First steps at Pre-salt in Brazil
4. Comparison between conventional and NMR approaches for formation evaluation of presalt interval in the Buzios Field, Santos Basin, Brazil10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109679 ↗
5. The impact of the complex evaporites features’ on the seismic illumination of the underlying rocks: A case study in the Brazilian presalt10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107177 ↗
6. Geological process modeling and geostatistics for facies reconstruction of presalt carbonates10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104828 ↗
7. A workflow for reservoir characterization applied to presalt coquinas from the Linguado Field, Campos Basin, Brazil10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106451 ↗
8. Bit optimization method for rotary impact drilling based on specific energy model10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110977 ↗
9. An analytical method to select appropriate linear and non-linear correlations on the effectiveness of penetration rate parameter towards mechanical specific energy10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.055 ↗
10. The effect of formation thickness on the performance of deterministic and machine learning models for rate of penetration management in inclined and horizontal wells10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107160 ↗
11. Electric Impulse Technology: Long Run Drilling in Hard Rocks
12. Real-time monitoring of mechanical specific energy and bit wear using control engineering systems10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.038 ↗
13. Fifty years of experience in rate of penetration management: Managed pressure drilling technology, mechanical specific energy concept, bit management approach and expert systems—A review10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109184 ↗
14. Coupling rate of penetration and mechanical specific energy to Improve the efficiency of drilling gas wells10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103558 ↗
15. Reference dataset for rate of penetration benchmarking10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108069 ↗
16. Is Support Vector Regression method suitable for predicting rate of penetration?10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107542 ↗
17. Drilling optimization of petroleum wells: A data analysis of the drilling fluid flow-rate influence in ROP10.21712/lajer.2021.v8.n1.p59-66 ↗
18. Numerical simulation and modeling of a laboratory MWD mud siren pressure pulse propagation in fluid filled pipe
19. Framework for automated generation of real-time rate of penetration models10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110369 ↗
20. Reverse Engineering: A New Well Monitoring and Analysis Methodology Approaching Playing-Back Drill-Rate Tests in Real-Time for Drilling Optimization10.1115/1.4033067 ↗
21. Artificial neural networks-based correlation for evaluating the rate of penetration in a vertical carbonate formation for an entire oil field10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109693 ↗
22. Data-driven recurrent neural network model to predict the rate of penetration: Upstream Oil and Gas Technology10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100047 ↗
23. Optimising casing milling Rate Of Penetration (ROP) by applying the concept of Mechanical Specific Energy (MSE): A justification of the concept’s applicability by literature review and a pilot study10.1016/j.petrol.2019.06.008 ↗
24. Structure design of weight-on-bit self-adjusting PDC bit based on stress field analysis and experiment evaluation10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107692 ↗
25. Rate of penetration prediction while drilling vertical complex lithology using an ensemble learning model10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109335 ↗
26. Computational prediction of the drilling rate of penetration (ROP): A comparison of various machine learning approaches and traditional models10.1016/j.petrol.2021.110033 ↗
27. Downhole data correction for data-driven rate of penetration prediction modeling10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109904 ↗
28. A novel dynamic model for the online prediction of rate of penetration and its industrial application to a drilling process10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.12.002 ↗
29. Real-time prediction of rate of penetration while drilling complex lithologies using artificial intelligence techniques10.1016/j.asej.2020.05.014 ↗
30. A novel rate of penetration prediction model with identified condition for the complex geological drilling process10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.02.001 ↗
31. Half a century experience in rate of penetration management: Application of machine learning methods and optimization algorithms—A review10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109575 ↗
32. Machine learning methods applied to drilling rate of penetration prediction and optimization—A review10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106332 ↗
33. Rate of penetration (ROP) optimization in drilling with vibration control10.1016/j.jngse.2019.04.017 ↗
34. An Efficient Approach for Real-Time Prediction of Rate of Penetration in Offshore Drilling
35. Mechanical specific energy versus depth of cut in rock cutting and drilling10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.11.004 ↗
36. Geomechanical parameter estimation from mechanical specific energy using artificial intelligence10.1016/j.petrol.2018.12.054 ↗
37. Real-time optimization of drilling parameters based on mechanical specific energy for rotating drilling with positive displacement motor in the hard formation10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.019 ↗
38. Specific energy as a criterion for drill performance prediction10.1016/0148-9062(82)90709-4 ↗
39. Research on lithology identification method based on mechanical specific energy principle and machine learning theory10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116142 ↗
40. Development of a Cutting Force Model for a Single PDC Cutter Based on the Rock Stress State10.1007/s00603-019-01893-7 ↗
41. Comparison of field and laboratory-simulated drill-off tests10.2118/16162-PA ↗
42. Souto, T.C., and Nascimento, A. (2016). Metodologia para Otimização da Perfuração aplicada ao Pré-Sal: Análise através da Energia Mecânica Específica. Lat. Am. J. Energy Res., 1–13. Available online: https://scirp.org/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=2485138.
43. Nascimento, A., Mathias, M.H., Thonhauser, G., Gonçalves, J.L., and Elmgerbi, A. (2019). Applicability of Automation and Drilling Optimization in Pre-salt Operations. DGMK/ÖGEW-Frühjahrstagung, 107–115.
44. Douziech, M., Tosti, L., Ferrara, N., Parisi, M.L., Pérez-López, P., and Ravier, G. (2021). Applying harmonised geothermal life cycle assessment guidelines to the rittershoffen geothermal heat plant. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14133820 ↗
45. Improving rate of penetration prediction by combining data from an adjacent well in a geothermal project10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.029 ↗
46. Optimization of drilling parameters using improved play-back methodology10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108991 ↗
47. Webb, J., Roze, E., Jarret, C., Le Roux, S., and Meija, C. Drilling engineering and formation evaluation: An integrated approach to improve real time drilling optimization. Proceedings of the Paper Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Available online: https://onepetro.org/SPEWRM/proceedings-abstract/16WRM/All-16WRM/SPE-180400-MS/188159.
48. Rehm, B., Schubert, J., Haghshenas, A., and Paknejad, A.S. (2013). Managed Pressure Drilling, Elsevier. Available online: https://books.google.com/books?hl=pt-PT&lr=&id=NXejAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=NtqdNsKvYs&sig=LKZzHU_P_W_Hu5kHRK0Bj0NGCsE.
49. Loss circulation in drilling and well construction: The significance of applications of crosslinked polymers in wellbore strengthening: A review10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106653 ↗
50. Nascimento, A., Elmgerbi, A., Roohi, A., Prohaska, M., Thonhauser, G., and Mathias, M.H. Dynamic Drill-rate Test Approach Appplied to a Pre-salt Case Study. Proceedings of the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference.
51. Hybrid data driven drilling and rate of penetration optimization10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108075 ↗
52. Dupriest, F.E., and Koederitz, W.L. Maximizing drill rates with real-time surveillance of mechanical specific energy. Proceedings of the Paper presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Available online: https://onepetro.org/SPEDC/proceedings-abstract/05DC/All-05DC/SPE-92194-MS/72603.
53. Real-Time Prediction and Optimization of Drilling Performance Based on a New Mechanical Specific Energy Model10.1007/s13369-014-1376-0 ↗
54. Qin, J., Yin, S., Yang, N., Chen, X., Tian, B., Xue, L., and Ma, Y. (2022). A New Mechanical Specific Energy Model for Composite Impact Drilling. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122010356 ↗
55. Gandelman, R.A. (2012). Predição da ROP e Timização em Tempo Real de Parâmetros Operacionais na Perfuração de Poços. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro]. Available online: http://186.202.79.107/download/predicao-da-rop-e-otimizacao-em-tempo-real.pdf.
56. Evaluation of coupled machine learning models for drilling optimization10.1016/j.jngse.2018.06.006 ↗
57. Multiple response optimization: Analysis of genetic programming for symbolic regression and assessment of desirability functions10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.002 ↗
58. An interactive desirability function method to multiresponse optimization10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.018 ↗
59. Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968 ↗
60. Parametric study of Unstiffened multi-planar tubular KK-Joints10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100400 ↗
61. Conception of a Web Operation System for Processing Petroleum Related Drilling Data: A Focus on Pre-Salt Real-Time Automation and Optimization10.4236/jsea.2019.124005 ↗