journal article·2023-07-12Open access

K-Means Clustering of 51 Geospatial Layers Identified for Use in Continental-Scale Modeling of Outdoor Acoustic Environments

Katrina Pedersen, Ryan R. Jensen, Lucas K. Hall, Mitchell C. Cutler, Mark K. Transtrum, Kent L. Gee, Shane V. Lympany

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 14

Abstract

Applying machine learning methods to geographic data provides insights into spatial patterns in the data as well as assists in interpreting and describing environments. This paper investigates the results of k-means clustering applied to 51 geospatial layers, selected and scaled for a model of outdoor acoustic environments, in the continental United States. Silhouette and elbow analyses were performed to identify an appropriate number of clusters (eight). Cluster maps are shown and the clusters are described, using correlations between the geospatial layers and clusters to identify distinguishing characteristics for each cluster. A subclustering analysis is presented in which each of the original eight clusters is further divided into two clusters. Because the clustering analysis used geospatial layers relevant to modeling outdoor acoustics, the geospatially distinct environments corresponding to the clusters may aid in characterizing acoustically distinct environments. Therefore, the clustering analysis can guide data collection for the problem of modeling outdoor acoustic environments by identifying poorly sampled regions of the feature space (i.e., clusters which are not well-represented in the training data).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Noise Effects and Management · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA

Department of Geography, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA

Department of Biology, California State University Bakersfield, Bakersfield, CA 93311, USA

Blue Ridge Research and Consulting, LLC, Asheville, NC 28801, USA

Funding

College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences at Brigham Young University · U.S. Army Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Ambient Noise Is “The New Secondhand Smoke”10.1121/AT.2019.15.3.38 ↗
2. How and why environmental noise impacts animals: An integrative, mechanistic review10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x ↗
3. Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.052 ↗
4. Underwater noise: Sources and effects on marine life
5. Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.017 ↗
6. Anthropogenic noise in US national parks–sources and spatial extent10.1002/fee.2112 ↗
7. The Energy Footprint: How Oil, Natural Gas, and Wind Energy Affect Land for Biodiversity and the Flow of Ecosystem Services10.1093/biosci/biu224 ↗
8. Cicada acoustic communication: Potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Cicadidae)10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb02079.x ↗
9. Phylogenetic and ecological determinants of the neotropical dawn chorus10.1098/rspb.2005.3410 ↗
10. Noise reduction by vegetation and ground10.1121/1.1912830 ↗
11. Remote Sensing and GIS in modeling visual landscape change: A case study of the northwestern arid coast of Egypt10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.002 ↗
12. GIS-based Analysis of Temporal Evolution of Rural Landscape: A Case Study in Southern Italy10.1007/s11053-018-9402-7 ↗
13. Identifying brown bear habitat by a combined GIS and machine learning method10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00384-7 ↗
14. Modeling maize above-ground biomass based on machine learning approaches using UAV remote-sensing data10.1186/s13007-019-0394-z ↗
15. Unsupervised learning approach in defining the similarity of catchments: Hydrological response unit based k-means clustering, a demonstration on Western Black Sea Region of Turkey10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.05.002 ↗
16. Clustering of mineral prospectivity area as an unsupervised classification approach to explore copper deposit10.1007/s12517-012-0615-5 ↗
17. Modeling urban evolution using neural networks, fuzzy logic and GIS: The case of the Athens Metropolitan area10.1016/j.cities.2012.03.006 ↗
18. A simple and robust wetland classification approach by using optical indices, unsupervised and supervised machine learning algorithms
19. Chang, Z., Du, Z., Zhang, F., Huang, F., Chen, J., Li, W., and Guo, Z. (2020). Landslide susceptibility prediction based on remote sensing images and GIS: Comparisons of supervised and unsupervised machine learning models. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12030502 ↗
20. Comparison of methods for land-use classification incorporating remote sensing and GIS inputs10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.11.006 ↗
21. Modeling anthropogenic noise propagation using the Sound Mapping Tools ArcGIS toolbox10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.008 ↗
22. Application of land use regression modelling to assess the spatial distribution of road traffic noise in three European cities10.1038/jes.2014.61 ↗
23. Application of land-use regression models to estimate sound pressure levels and frequency components of road traffic noise in Taichung, Taiwan10.1016/j.envint.2019.104959 ↗
24. Mapping Urban Environmental Noise: A Land Use Regression Method10.1021/es200785x ↗
25. Influence factors and spatiotemporal patterns of environmental sound levels in the contiguous United States10.3397/1/376384 ↗
26. Validating two geospatial models of continental-scale environmental sound levels10.1121/10.0007368 ↗
27. Eve, S. (2017). The embodied GIS. Using Mixed Reality to explore multi-sensory archaeological landscapes. Internet Archaeol., 44.10.11141/ia.44.3 ↗
28. Soundscapes in the past: Investigating sound at the landscape level
29. Hong, J.Y., and Jeon, J.Y. (2014). Soundscape mapping in urban contexts using GIS techniques. Inter-Noise.
30. Combining visual and noise characteristics of a neighborhood environment to model residential satisfactions: An application of GIS-based metrics10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103932 ↗
31. Unsupervised K-Means Clustering Algorithm10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988796 ↗
32. (2020, June 03). DataStore—Geospatial Sound Modeling, Available online: https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2217356.
33. Nelson, L., Kinseth, M., and Flowe, T. (2020, June 03). Explanatory Variable Generation for Geospatial Sound Modeling–Standard Operating Procedure. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/NRR–2015/936. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, Available online: https://irma.nps.gov/App/Reference/Profile/2221202.
34. Pedersen, K., Transtrum, M.K., Gee, K.L., Lympany, S.V., James, M.J., and Salton, A.R. Feature Selection for a Continental-Scale Geospatial Model of Environmental Sound Levels, In Review.
35. Survey of clustering algorithms10.1109/TNN.2005.845141 ↗
36. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
37. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 ↗
38. EBK-Means: A Clustering Technique based on Elbow Method and K-Means in WSN
39. Sun, J., Li, Z., Zou, F., and Yang, Y. (2012, January 8–10). Adaptive Determining for Optimal Cluster Number of K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and Software Engineering: Information Technology & Computing Intelligence, Beijing, China.10.1007/978-3-642-34522-7_59 ↗
40. Huan, D., and Nguyen, D.T. (2014, January 3–5). An adaptive method to determine the number of clusters in clustering process. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
41. Estimating the Optimal Number of Clusters k in a Dataset Using Data Depth10.1007/s41019-019-0091-y ↗
42. Real Noise from the Urban Environment: How Ambient Community Noise Affects Health and What Can Be Done About It10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.019 ↗