journal article·2023-04-25Open access

Bayesian Uncertainty Inferencing for Fault Diagnosis of Intelligent Instruments in IoT Systems

Qing Liu, Chengcheng Wang, Qiang Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

Intelligent instruments are common components in industrial machinery, and fault diagnosis in IoT systems requires the handling of real-time sensor data and expert knowledge. IoT sensors cannot collect data for the diagnosis of all fault types in a specific instrument, and long-distance data transfer introduces additional uncertainties. However, because industrial equipment has complex fault causes and performances, it is typically difficult or expensive to obtain exact fault probabilities. Therefore, in this study, we proposed an innovative failure detection and diagnosis model for intelligent instruments in an IoT system using a Bayesian network, with a focus on handling uncertainties in expert knowledge and IoT monitoring information. The model addresses the challenge of complex fault causes and performances in industrial equipment, which make the obtainment of exact fault probabilities difficult or expensive. The trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy number (TrIFN)-based entropy method was applied in order to aggregate expert knowledge to generate priority probability, and the Leaky-OR gate was used to calculate CPT. The effectiveness of the proposed strategy was demonstrated through its application to an intelligent pressure transmitter (IPT) using the GeNIe software.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Risk and Safety Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Quality and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Standard and Test Center, Instrumentation Technology and Economy Institute, Beijing 100055, China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · Zhejiang Special Support Program for High-Level Personnel Recruitment of China · The National Natural Science Foundation of China · “Pioneer” and “Leading Goose” R&D Program of Zhejiang

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Detection of unanticipated faults for autonomous underwater vehicles using online topic models10.1002/rob.21771 ↗
2. Failure probability analysis of the urban buried gas pipelines using bayesian networks10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.040 ↗
3. Failure rate modeling using fault tree analysis and Bayesian network: Demo pulsed operation turbine study case10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.02.036 ↗
4. Risk assessment by integrating interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian network, case of offshore pipeline project10.1016/j.ress.2015.06.013 ↗
5. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufmann.
6. Pearl, J., and Mackenzie, D. (2018). The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect, Basic Books.
7. Fault diagnosis of train network control management system based on dynamic fault tree and Bayesian network10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3046681 ↗
8. Fault diagnosis system of bridge crane equipment based on fault tree and Bayesian network10.1007/s00170-019-03793-0 ↗
9. Fault diagnosis of multi-state gas monitoring network based on fuzzy Bayesian net10.1007/s00779-019-01237-w ↗
10. Fault diagnosis model based on Bayesian network considering information uncertainty and its application in traction power supply system10.1002/tee.22616 ↗
11. Hierarchical Bayesian Network Modeling Framework for Large-Scale Process Monitoring and Decision Making10.1109/TCST.2018.2882562 ↗
12. Framework for fault diagnosis with multi-source sensor nodes in nuclear power plants based on a Bayesian network10.1016/j.anucene.2018.08.050 ↗
13. An introduction to multisensor data fusion10.1109/5.554205 ↗
14. Ademujimi, T., and Prabhu, V. (2021). Fusion Learning of Bayesian Network Models for Fault Diagnostics. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21227633 ↗
15. Model-based information fusion investigation on fault isolation of subsea systems considering the interaction among subsystems and sensors10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104267 ↗
16. Online Fault Diagnosis for Industrial Processes with Bayesian Network based Probabilistic Ensemble Learning Strategy10.1109/TASE.2019.2915286 ↗
17. Optimization of a Dynamic Fault Diagnosis Model Based on Machine Learning10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877959 ↗
18. Sensor layout optimization by integrating Bayesian approach to diagnose multi-station assembly processes10.1016/j.measurement.2019.06.021 ↗
19. An imitation medical diagnosis method of hydro-turbine generating unit based on Bayesian network10.1177/0142331219826665 ↗
20. Expert knowledge elicitation to improve formal and mental models10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199824)14:4<309::AID-SDR154>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
21. Process system failure evaluation method based on a Noisy-OR gate intuitionistic fuzzy Bayesian network in an uncertain environment10.1016/j.psep.2021.04.024 ↗
22. Why the magic number seven plus or minus two10.1016/S0895-7177(03)90083-5 ↗
23. Reliability evaluation of fire alarm systems using dynamic Bayesian networks and fuzzy fault tree analysis10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104229 ↗
24. A grey relational projection method for multi-attribute decision making based on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number10.1016/j.apm.2012.08.012 ↗
25. Aggregation operators on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number and its application to multi-criteria decision making problems
26. A Method to Derive Experts’ Weights in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-attribute Group Decision Making Based on Cross Entropy and Entropy
27. Dynamic multi-criteria group decision making method based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers
28. Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets10.1016/0165-0114(95)00154-9 ↗
29. Some Practical Issues in Constructing Belief Networks
30. Learning Bayesian network parameters from small data sets: Application of Noisy-OR gates10.1016/S0888-613X(01)00039-1 ↗
31. Dynamic Bayesian networks based performance evaluation of subsea blowout preventers in presence of imperfect repair10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.064 ↗
32. Gas pipeline failure evaluation method based on a Noisy-OR gate Bayesian network10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104175 ↗
33. A review of the development of Smart Grid technologies10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.011 ↗
34. Tightiz, L., and Yang, H. (2020). A comprehensive review on IoT protocols’ features in smart grid communication. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13112762 ↗
35. A survey on smart grid technologies and applications10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.092 ↗
36. PMU-based FOPID controller of large-scale wind-PV farms for LFO damping in smart grid10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3094170 ↗
37. IoT-enabled smart grid via SM: An overview10.1016/j.future.2019.02.012 ↗
38. Internal corrosion hazard assessment of oil & gas pipelines using Bayesian belief network model10.1016/j.jlp.2016.02.001 ↗
39. Use of fuzzy fault tree analysis and Bayesian network for occurrence likelihood estimation of navigational accidents in the Qinzhou Port10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112381 ↗