journal article·2023-01-20Open access

Multi-Attribute Machine Learning Model for Electrical Motors Performance Prediction

Maria Raluca Raia, Sebastian Ciceo, Fabien Chauvicourt, Claudia Martis

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 3

Abstract

Designing an electrical motor is a complex process that needs to deal with the non-linearity phenomena caused by the saturation of the iron at high magnetic field strength, the multi-physical nature of the investigated system and with requirements that may come into conflict. This paper proposes to use geometric parametric models to evaluate the multi-physical performances of electrical machines and build a machine learning model that is able to predict multi-physical characteristics of electrical machines from input geometrical parameters. The focus of this work is to accurately estimate the electromagnetic characteristics, motor losses and stator natural frequencies, using the developed machine learning model, at the early-design stage of the electrical motor, when the information about the housing is not available and to include the model in optimisation loops, to speed-up the computational time. Three individual machine learning models are built for each physics analysed, a model for the torque and back electromotive force harmonic orders, one model for motor losses and another one for natural frequencies of the mode-shapes. The necessary data is obtained by varying the geometrical parameters of 2D electromagnetic and 3D structural motor parametric models. The accuracy of different machine learning regression algorithms are compared to obtain the best model for each physics involved. Ultimately, the developed multi-attribute model is integrated in an optimisation routine, to compare the computational time with the classical finite element analysis (FEA) optimisation approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electric Motor Design and Analysis · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Machines and Drives, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Siemens Industry Software, 500227 Brașov, Romania

Engineering Services RTD, Siemens Industry Software NV, 3001 Leuven, Belgium

BEAMS Department, Electrical Energy Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Funding

Project “Entrepreneurial competences and excellence research in doctoral and postdoctoral programs—ANTREDOC” · European Social Fund · project 38 PFE in the frame of the programme PDI-PFE-CDI 2021

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Robustness to Large-Scale Mass Production Manufacturing Tolerances by Means of Sensitivity and Statistical Analysis for IPMSMs10.1109/TEC.2020.3004695 ↗
2. Optimization of electric machine design—Part I10.1109/TIE.2017.2753359 ↗
3. Surrogate-Based Multi-Objective Optimization of Electrical Machine Designs Facilitating Tolerance Analysis10.1109/TMAG.2017.2694802 ↗
4. A review of recent developments in electrical machine design optimization methods with a permanent-magnet synchronous motor benchmark study10.1109/TIA.2013.2252597 ↗
5. Bramerdorfer, G., Silber, S., Weidenholzer, G., and Amrhein, W. (2013, January 12–15). Comprehensive cost optimization study of high-efficiency brushless synchronous machines. Proceedings of the 2013 International Electric Machines & Drives Conference, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/IEMDC.2013.6556291 ↗
6. Optimization of low-power brushless PM-machines for automotive applications with focus on high-volume mass production10.1109/TIE.2017.2698367 ↗
7. Sensitivity Analysis of Torque Ripple Reduction of Synchronous Reluctance and Interior PM Motors10.1109/TIA.2014.2327143 ↗
8. Koziel, S., and Leifsson, L.P. (2013). Surrogate-Based Modeling and Optimization: Applications in Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7551-4 ↗
9. Silva, R.C.P. (2018). Surrogate Problem Evaluation and Selection for Optimization with Expensive Function Evaluations. [Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McGill University].
10. Two-Stage Surrogate Model for Finite-Element-Based Optimization of Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor10.1109/TMAG.2007.902348 ↗
11. Neural network approach compared to sensitivity analysis based on finite element technique for optimization of permanent magnet generators10.1109/20.952675 ↗
12. Minimal function calls approach with on-line learning and dynamic weighting for computationally intensive design optimization10.1109/20.952628 ↗
13. Surrogate-Based MOEA/D for Electric Motor Design With Scarce Function Evaluations10.1109/TMAG.2017.2661987 ↗
14. Lim, D.-K., Woo, D.-K., Yeo, H.-K., Jung, S.-Y., and Jung, H.-K. (2016, January 13–16). A new robust surrogate-assisted multi-objective optimization algorithm for an IPMSM design. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC), Miami, FL, USA.10.1109/CEFC.2016.7815908 ↗
15. Data-Driven Electrical Machines Structural Model Using the Vibration Synthesis Method10.1109/TTE.2022.3164644 ↗
16. Vibration Analysis of Delta-Connected PMSMs Using Lookup Table-Based Models—Influence of the 0-Sequence Component10.1109/TIE.2021.3097607 ↗
17. Artificial Neural Network and Data Dimensionality Reduction Based on Machine Learning Methods for PMSM Model Order Reduction10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3095668 ↗
18. Effect of acoustic noise on optimal SynRM design regions10.1109/TMAG.2017.2760859 ↗
19. Surrogate-Based Acoustic Noise Prediction of Electric Motors10.1109/TMAG.2019.2945407 ↗
20. Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Key Performance Indicators for Electrical Machines10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3053856 ↗
21. Two-Dimensional Fourier-Based Modeling of Electric Machines—An Overview10.1109/TMAG.2019.2923544 ↗
22. (2022, November 28). Towards Data Science. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/how-not-to-use-machine-learning-for-time-series-forecasting-avoiding-the-pitfalls-19f9d7adf424.
23. Vibration Modes of Radial Tires: Measurement, Prediction, and Categorization Under Different Boundary and Operating Conditions
24. Impact of Geometry on the Rotor Iron Losses in Synchronous Reluctance Motors10.1109/TIA.2019.2939508 ↗
25. Bianchi, N., Barcaro, M., and Bolognani, S. (2012). Finite Element Analysis—From Biomedical Applications to Industrial Developments, IntechOpen. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/34521.
26. Improved Analytical Estimation of Rotor Losses in High-Speed Surface-Mounted PM Synchronous Machines10.1109/TIA.2017.2693178 ↗
27. Popescu, M., Staton, D., Dorrell, D., Marignetti, F., and Hawkins, D. (2013, January 11–12). Study of the thermal aspects in brushless permanent magnet machines performance. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Workshop on Electrical Machines Design, Control and Diagnosis (WEMDCD), Paris, France.10.1109/WEMDCD.2013.6525165 ↗
28. (2022, November 28). Machine Learning in Python. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/.
29. (2022, November 28). Towards Data Science. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/an-introduction-to-support-vector-regression-svr-a3ebc1672c2.
30. (2023, January 09). Towards Data Science. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/when-do-support-vector-machines-fail-3f23295ebef2.
31. (2023, January 09). Machine Learning in Python. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.svm.SVR.html.
32. Lee, J.A., and Verleysen, M. (2007). Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-0-387-39351-3 ↗
33. (2023, January 09). Machine Learning in Python. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/feature_selection.html.
34. (2022, November 28). Towards Data Science. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/all-you-need-to-know-about-gradient-boosting-algorithm-part-1-regression-2520a34a502.
35. (2023, January 09). KDnuggets. Available online: https://www.kdnuggets.com/2018/08/make-machine-learning-models-robust-outliers.html.
36. (2023, January 09). Analytics India Magazine. Available online: https://analyticsindiamag.com/adaboost-vs-gradient-boosting-a-comparison-of-leading-boosting-algorithms/.
37. (2022, November 28). Towards Data Science. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-gradient-boosting-machines-9be756fe76ab.
38. (2023, January 09). Data Science. Available online: https://datascience.eu/machine-learning/regularization-in-machine-learning/.
39. (2023, January 09). KDnuggets. Available online: https://www.kdnuggets.com/2022/08/avoid-overfitting.html.
40. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’16), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
41. (2022, November 28). Machine Learning in Python. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/gaussian_process.html.
42. Rasmussen, C.E., and Williams, C.K.I. (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
43. Seyed Mostafa, K., and Marquand, A. (2018). International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer.
44. Xu, B., Kuplicki, R., Sen, S., and Paulus, M.P. (2021). The pitfalls of using Gaussian Process Regression for normative modeling. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1101/2021.05.11.443565 ↗
45. (2023, January 09). Towards Data Science. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/gaussian-process-regression-from-first-principles-833f4aa5f842.
46. HEEDS MDO User Manual.
47. Surrogate vibration modeling approach for design optimization of electric machines10.1109/TTE.2020.3017232 ↗