The Efficacy, Phytotoxicity, and Safety of Liquid Ethyl Formate Used to Control the Grape (Campbell Early) Quarantine Pest Pseudococcus comstocki
Source abstract
Abstract
Mealybugs found on grapes during quarantine in Korea are fumigated with methyl bromide (MB). However, MB is an ozone-depleting, highly toxic pesticide; therefore, the International Plant Protection Convention, a representative organization involved in quarantine, recommends using MB alternatives. We evaluated the feasibility of using liquid ethyl formate (EF), a new EF formulation, to control mealybugs (Pseudococcus comstocki) on grapes (Campbell Early). Large-scale tests and the comparative evaluation of EF and MB desorption from grapes were conducted during the simulated 72-h post-fumigation period. Dose–response tests showed that the EF concentration and time product causing 99% mortality (LCt99) at 5 °C was 47.36 and 145.85 g h/m3 for adults and eggs, respectively. EF treatment at 70 g/m3 for 4 h at 5 °C with a loading ratio of 10% achieved an LCt99 of 145.85 g h/m3 on P. comstocki, confirming EF efficacy on mealybugs without phytotoxic effects on grapes. EF fumigation may also be safer because EF concentrations were maintained at less than 100 ppm, the specified exposure limit of EF; meanwhile, those of MB were higher than the exposure limit (1 ppm). Therefore, liquid EF can be used as a safer alternative to MB in phytosanitary treatments of grapes to control P. comstocki.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Insect Pest Control Strategies · Insect behavior and control techniques · Insect and Pesticide Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Quality & Safety Evaluation of Agricultural Product, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
Department of Plant Medicine, Sunchon University, 255 Jungang-ro, Suncheon 57922, Korea
Department of Bioenvironmental Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
Funding
Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency · Jeonbuk National University
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. OEC (2022, August 24). Grapes. Available online: https://oec.world/en/profile/hs/grapes.
2. KATI (2022, July 19). Grape. Available online: https://m.kati.net/product/basisInfo.do?lcdCode=MD154.
3. APQA (2022, June 10). Phytosanitary Disinfestation Guidelines. Available online: http://www.qia.go.kr/plant/disinpect/listXdclbzWebAction.do.
4. UNEP (2018). Handbook for the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, United Nations Environment Programme. [12th ed.].
5. MBTOC (2010). 2010 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee, United Nations Environment Programme. 9789966200006.
6. Neurological Manifestation of Methyl Bromide Intoxication
7. Health risks in international container and bulk cargo transport due to volatile toxic compounds10.1186/s12995-015-0059-4 ↗
8. Health effects due to fumigated freight containers and goods: How to detect, how to act
9. Methyl bromide intoxication during grain store fumigation10.1093/occmed/46.1.89 ↗
10. Park, M.-G., Choi, J., Hong, Y.-S., Park, C.G., Kim, B.-G., Lee, S.-Y., Lim, H.-J., Mo, H.-h., Lim, E., and Cha, W. (2020). Negative effect of methyl bromide fumigation work on the central nervous system. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0236694 ↗
11. Variations in methyl bromide concentration with distance and time during quarantine fumigation10.1007/s10661-021-09154-3 ↗
12. Heart rate variability analysis in workers exposed to methyl bromide as a quarantine treatment10.1097/JOM.0000000000002083 ↗
13. IPPC (2008). Reccomendation on: Replacement or Reduction of the Use of Methyl bromide as a Phytosanitary Measure, FAO.
14. Cytochrome c oxidase inhibition in the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (L.) by formate, the toxic metabolite of volatile alkyl formates10.1016/S1532-0456(03)00173-X ↗
15. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (2005). 2005 TLVs and BEIs, American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
16. Yang, J.O., Kim, H.M., Park, Y.J., Park, M.G., Ren, Y.L., and Lee, B.H. (2017, January 6–7). New Quarantine Trials for Using Liquid Ethyl Formate with Nitrogen Application on Imported Citrus Fruits_Cost Effectiveness and Worker Safety. Proceedings of the International Symposium and Annual Meeting of the Korean Society of Pesticide Science (KSPS), Yeosu, Korea.
17. Apqa (2019). Regulations for Phytosanitray Treatment of Import and Export Plant, Apqa.
18. List of Intercepted Scale Insects at Korean Ports of Entry and Potential Invasive Species of Scale Insects to Korea (Hemiptera: Coccoidea)10.5656/KSAE.2013.03.0.007 ↗
19. (2022, July 20). APQA. Available online: http://www.qia.go.kr/animal/prevent/listwebQiaCom.do?type=3_52jynb&clear=1.
20. (2022, July 20). APQA. Available online: http://www.qia.go.kr/bbs/lawAnn/listLawWebAction.do?type=0&key=%ED%8F%AC%EB%8F%84&firstkorkey=&nextkorkey=&lawQuery.jbbk_fl=all&pager.maxPageItems=10&pager.offset=0.
21. Ethyl Formate as a Methyl Bromide Alternative for Phytosanitary Disinfestation of Imported Banana in Korea with Logistical Considerations10.1093/jee/toaa088 ↗
22. Ethyl Formate as a Methyl Bromide Alternative for Fumigation of Citrus: Efficacy, Fruit Quality, and Workplace Safety10.1093/jee/toab175 ↗
23. Ethyl formate fumigation of dry and semidry date fruits: Experimental kinetics, modeling, and lethal effect on carob moth10.1093/jee/tov032 ↗
24. Ethyl formate fumigation for the disinfestation of red imported fire ants Solenopsis invicta Buren10.1016/j.aspen.2019.06.013 ↗
25. Ethyl formate fumigation and ethyl formate plus cold treatment combination as potential phytosanitary quarantine treatments of Drosophila suzukii in blueberries10.1016/j.aspen.2020.11.008 ↗
26. Ethyl formate as a postharvest fumigant for selected pests of table grapes10.1093/jee/100.4.1084 ↗
27. Susceptibilities of Five Species of Scales (Diaspididae and Coccidae) and Mealybugs (Pseudococcidae) to Fumigation with a Gas Mixture of Ethyl Formate and Carbon Dioxide under Normal Atmospheric Pressure or Vacuum
28. Postharvest Control of Western Flower Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and California Red Scale (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) With Ethyl Formate and Its Impact on Citrus Fruit Quality10.1603/EC13111 ↗
29. Developing ethyl formate treatment for disinfesting pipfruit
30. A combination treatment using ethyl formate and phosphine to control Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on pineapples10.1093/jee/tow222 ↗
31. Penetration of methyl bromide, sulfuryl fluoride, ethanedinitrile and phosphine into timber blocks and the sorption rate of the fumigants10.1016/j.jspr.2010.04.006 ↗
32. Development by Temperatures and Copulation Flight of Comstock mealybug, Pseudococcus comstocki
33. Evaluation of table grape storage in boxes with sulfur dioxide-releasing pads with either an internal plastic liner or external wrap10.21273/HORTTECH.18.2.206 ↗
34. Finney, D.J. (1971). Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press. [3rd ed.].
35. Kim, K., Park, M.-G., Lee, Y.H., Jeon, H.-J., Kwon, T.H., Kim, C., Park, J., Lee, B.-H., Yang, J.O., and Lee, S.-E. (2021). Synergistic Effects and Toxic Mechanism of Phosphine with Ethyl Formate against Citrus Mealybug (Planococcus citri). Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11219877 ↗
36. Use of Ethyl Formate Fumigation to Control Adult Bean Thrips in Navel Oranges10.1093/jee/toy369 ↗
37. Evaluation of the synergistic effect between ethyl formate and phospine for control of Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae)10.1093/jee/tov289 ↗
38. Ethyl formate and phosphine fumigations on the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae and their biochemical responses10.1186/s13765-019-0458-9 ↗
39. Scaled-up ethyl formate fumigation to replace methyl bromide on traded mushroom to disinfest mushroom fly (Lycoriella mali)10.1186/s13765-021-00635-0 ↗
40. IPPC (2007). Phytosanitary Treatments for Regulated Pests, FAO/IPPC. ISPM 28.
41. Bond, E.J. (1984). Manual of Fumigation for Insect Control, FAO. [2nd ed.].
42. Preliminary study to evaluate ethanedinitrile (C2 N2) for quarantine treatment of four wood destroying pests10.1002/ps.6562 ↗
43. Comparison of the efficacy and phytotoxicity of phosphine and ethyl formate for controlling Pseudococcus longispinus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and Pseudococcus orchidicola on imported foliage nursery plants10.1093/jee/toz125 ↗
44. Fumigation activity of ethyl formate and phosphine against Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on imported sweet pumpkin10.1093/jee/toy090 ↗
45. Concurrent application of ethyl formate and 1-methylcyclopropene to control Tetranychus urticae on exported sweet persimmons (Diospyros kaki Thunb. ‘Fuyu’)10.1111/1748-5967.12269 ↗