journal article·2022-09-26Open access

SupMPN: Supervised Multiple Positives and Negatives Contrastive Learning Model for Semantic Textual Similarity

Somaiyeh Dehghan, Mehmet Fatih Amasyali

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 19

Abstract

Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) is an important task in the area of Natural Language Processing (NLP) that measures the similarity of the underlying semantics of two texts. Although pre-trained contextual embedding models such as Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) have achieved state-of-the-art performance on several NLP tasks, BERT-derived sentence embeddings have been proven to collapse in some way, i.e., sentence embeddings generated by BERT depend on the frequency of words. Therefore, almost all BERT-derived sentence embeddings are mapped into a small area and have a high cosine similarity. Hence, sentence embeddings generated by BERT are not so robust in the STS task as they cannot capture the full semantic meaning of the sentences. In this paper, we propose SupMPN: A Supervised Multiple Positives and Negatives Contrastive Learning Model, which accepts multiple hard-positive sentences and multiple hard-negative sentences simultaneously and then tries to bring hard-positive sentences closer, while pushing hard-negative sentences away from them. In other words, SupMPN brings similar sentences closer together in the representation space by discrimination among multiple similar and dissimilar sentences. In this way, SupMPN can learn the semantic meanings of sentences by contrasting among multiple similar and dissimilar sentences and can generate sentence embeddings based on the semantic meaning instead of the frequency of the words. We evaluate our model on standard STS and transfer-learning tasks. The results reveal that SupMPN outperforms state-of-the-art SimCSE and all other previous supervised and unsupervised models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34220, Turkey

References (94)

Show source-provided references
1. Hliaoutakis, A., Varelas, G., Voutsakis, E., Petrakis, E.G.M., and Milios, E. (2022, August 01). Information Retrieval by Semantic Similarity. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283921249_Information_retrieval_by_semantic_similarity.
2. Bridging the gap: Incorporating a semantic similarity measure for effectively mapping PubMed queries to documents10.1016/j.jbi.2017.09.014 ↗
3. SRL-ESA-TextSum: A text summarization approach based on semantic role labeling and explicit semantic analysis10.1016/j.ipm.2019.04.003 ↗
4. Hou, Y.-B. (2020). A Text Summarization Method Based on Semantic Similarity among Sentences. DEStech Trans. Social Sci. Educ. Human Sci.10.12783/dtssehs/ecemi2020/34692 ↗
5. Text classification using document-document semantic similarity10.1504/IJWS.2013.056572 ↗
6. Kim, Y. (2014, January 25–29). Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar.10.3115/v1/D14-1181 ↗
7. Malandrakis, N., Falcone, M., Vaz, C., Bisogni, J., Potamianos, A., and Narayanan, S. (2014, January 23–24). SAIL: Sentiment Analysis using Semantic Similarity and Contrast Features. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), Dublin, Ireland.10.3115/v1/S14-2089 ↗
8. Syntactic, Semantic and Sentiment Analysis: The Joint Effect on Automated Essay Evaluation10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933354 ↗
9. Bordes, A., Chopra, S., and Weston, J. (2014, January 25–29). Question Answering with Subgraph Embeddings. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar.10.3115/v1/D14-1067 ↗
10. Interpretable semantic textual similarity: Finding and explaining differences between sentences10.1016/j.knosys.2016.12.013 ↗
11. Castillo, J., and Estrella, P. (2012, January 7–8). Semantic Textual Similarity for MT evaluation. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Montreal, QC, Canada. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/W12-3103.
12. Zou, W.Y., Socher, R., Cer, D., and Manning, C.D. (2013, January 18–21). Bilingual word embeddings for phrasebased machine translation. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle, WA, USA. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/D13-1141.
13. Liu, S., He, T., Li, J., Li, Y., and Kumar, A. (2021). An Effective Learning Evaluation Method Based on Text Data with Real-time Attribution—A Case Study for Mathematical Class with Students of Junior Middle School in China. ACM Trans. Asian Low-Resour. Lang. Inf. Process.
14. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019, January 3–5). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
15. Li, B., Zhou, H., He, J., Wang, M., Yang, Y., and Li, L. (2020, January 16–20). On the Sentence Embeddings from Pre-trained Language Models. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Association for Computational Linguistics, Online.10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.733 ↗
16. Yan, Y., Li, R., Wang, S., Zhang, F., Wu, W., and Xu, W. (2021, January 1–6). ConSERT: A Contrastive Framework for Self-Supervised Sentence Representation Transfer. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1), Virtual Event.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.393 ↗
17. Chen, X., and He, K. (2021, January 20–25). Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learning. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01549 ↗
18. Robust human activity recognition from depth video using spatiotemporal multi-fused features10.1016/j.patcog.2016.08.003 ↗
19. Jalal, A., Quaid, M.A.K., and Sidduqi, M.A. (2019, January 8–12). A Triaxial Acceleration-based Human Motion Detection for Ambient Smart Home System. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST), Islamabad, Pakistan.10.1109/IBCAST.2019.8667183 ↗
20. Wu, H., Pan, W., Xiong, X., and Xu, S. (2014, January 28–30). Human activity recognition based on the combined SVM&HMM. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA), Hailar, China.10.1109/ICInfA.2014.6932656 ↗
21. Piyathilaka, L., and Kodagoda, S. (2013, January 19–21). Gaussian mixture based HMM for human daily activity recognition using 3D skeleton features. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 8th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/ICIEA.2013.6566433 ↗
22. Uddin, M.T., and Uddin, A. (2015, January 21–23). Human activity recognition from wearable sensors using extremely randomized trees. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Communication Technology (ICEEICT), Savar, Bangladesh.10.1109/ICEEICT.2015.7307384 ↗
23. Tang, C.I., Perez-Pozuelo, I., Spathis, D., and Mascolo, C. (2020). Exploring Contrastive Learning in Human Activity Recognition for Healthcare. arXiv, Presented at the Machine Learning for Mobile Health Workshop at NeurIPS 2020, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2020.
24. Huang, Q., Yang, J., and Qiao, Y. (November, January 30). Person re-identification across multi-camera system based on local descriptors. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras, Hong Kong, China.
25. Khaldi, K., and Shah, S.K. (2021, January 8–10). CUPR: Contrastive Unsupervised Learning for Person Re-identification. Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP 2021)—Volume 5: VISAPP, Online.10.5220/0010239900920100 ↗
26. Chen, I.-K., Chi, C.-Y., Hsu, S.-L., and Chen, L.-G. (2014, January 10–13). A real-time system for object detection and location reminding with RGB-D camera. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/ICCE.2014.6776063 ↗
27. Xie, E., Ding, J., Wang, W., Zhan, X., Xu, H., Sun, P., Li, Z., and Luo, P. (2021, January 10–17). DetCo: Unsupervised Contrastive Learning for Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00828 ↗
28. Advancements of image processing and vision in healthcare10.1155/2018/8458024 ↗
29. Zhang, Z., Jang, J., Trabelsi, C., Li, R., Sanner, S., Jeong, Y., and Shim, D. (2021). ExCon: Explanation-driven Supervised Contrastive Learning for Image Classification. arXiv.
30. Real-time continuous feature extraction in large size satellite images10.1016/j.sysarc.2015.11.006 ↗
31. Image Quality Assessment using Contrastive Learning10.1109/TIP.2022.3181496 ↗
32. Khosla, P., Teterwak, P., Wang, C., Sarna, A., Tian, Y., Isola, P., Maschinot, A., Liu, C., and Krishnan, D. (2021). Supervised Contrastive Learning. arXiv.
33. Wu, Z., Sinong, S., Gu, J., Khabsa, M., Sun, F., and Ma, H. (2020). CLEAR: Contrastive Learning for Sentence Representation. arXiv.
34. Kim, T., Yoo, K.M., and Lee, S. (2021, January 1–6). Self-Guided Contrastive Learning for BERT Sentence Representations. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processin, Virtual Event.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.197 ↗
35. Giorgi, J., Nitski, O., Wang, B., and Bader, G. (2021, January 1–6). DeCLUTR: Deep Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Textual Representations. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Virtual Event.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.72 ↗
36. Liu, F., Vulić, I., Korhonen, A., and Collier, N. (2021, January 7–11). Fast, Effective, and Self-Supervised: Transforming Masked Language Models into Universal Lexical and Sentence Encoders. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic.10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.109 ↗
37. Gao, T., Yao, X., and Chen, D. (2021, January 7–11). SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic.10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.552 ↗
38. Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., and Hinton, G. (2020). A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations. arXiv.
39. Hermans, A., Beyer, L., and Leibe, B. (2017). In defence of triplet loss for person re-identification. arXiv.
40. Sohn, K. (2016, January 5–10). Improved Deep Metric Learning with Multi-class N-pair Loss Objective. Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2016), Barcelona, Spain. Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2016/file/6b180037abbebea991d8b1232f8a8ca9-Paper.pdf.
41. Henderson, M., Al-Rfou, R., Strope, B., Sung, Y., Lukacs, L., Guo, R., Kumar, S., Miklos, B., and Kurzweil, R. (2017). Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Reply. arXiv.
42. Liu, S., Xu, X., Zhang, Y., Muhammad, K., and Fu, W. (2022). A Reliable Sample Selection Strategy for Weakly-supervised Visual Tracking. IEEE Trans. Reliab., 1–12.10.1109/TR.2022.3162346 ↗
43. Bowman, S.R., Angeli, G., Potts, C., and Manning, C.D. (2015, January 17–21). A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, Portugal.10.18653/v1/D15-1075 ↗
44. Williams, A., Nangia, N., and Bowman, S. (2018, January 1–6). A broad-coverage challenge corpus for sentence understanding through inference. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.18653/v1/N18-1101 ↗
45. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., and Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv.
46. Pennington, J., Socher, R., and Manning, C. (2014, January 25–29). Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar.10.3115/v1/D14-1162 ↗
47. Kiros, R., Zhu, Y., Salakhutdinov, R., Zemel, R., Torralba, A., Urtasun, R., and Fidler, S. (2015, January 7–12). Skip-thought vectors. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, QC, USA.
48. Enriching word vectors with sub word information10.1162/tacl_a_00051 ↗
49. Conneau, A., Kiela, D., Schwenk, H., Barrault, L., and Bordes, A. (2017). Supervised learning of universal sentence representations from natural language inference data. arXiv.10.18653/v1/D17-1070 ↗
50. Peters, M.E., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., and Zettlemoyer, L. (2018, January 1–6). Deep contextualized word representations. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.18653/v1/N18-1202 ↗
51. Cer, D., Yang, Y., Kong, S., Hua, N., Limtiaco, N., John, R., Constant, N., Guajardo-Cespedes, M., Yuan, S., and Tar, C. (November, January 31). Universal Sentence Encoder for English. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, Brussels, Belgium.10.18653/v1/D18-2029 ↗
52. Reimers, N., and Gurevych, I. (2019, January 3–7). Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert networks. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1410 ↗
53. Thakur, N., Reimers, N., Daxenberger, J., and Gurevych, I. (2021, January 6–11). Augmented sbert: Data augmentation method for improving bi-encoders for pairwise sentence scoring tasks. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Online.10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.28 ↗
54. SBERT-WK: A Sentence Embedding Method by Dissecting BERT-based Word Models10.1109/TASLP.2020.3008390 ↗
55. Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., and Stoyanov, V. (2019). Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv.
56. Zhang, Y., He, R., Liu, Z., Lim, K.H., and Bing, L. (2020). An unsupervised sentence embedding method by mutual information maximization. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.124 ↗
57. Carlsson, F., Gyllensten, A.C., Gogoulou, E., Hellqvist, E.Y., and Sahlgren, M. (2022, August 01). Semantic Re-Tuning with Contrastive Tension. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). Available online: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=Ov_sMNau-PF.
58. Hadsell, R., Chopra, S., and LeCun, Y. (2006, January 17–22). Dimensionality reduction by learning an invariant mapping. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’06), New York, NY, USA.
59. Chopra, S., Hadsell, R., and LeCun, Y. (2005, January 20–25). Learning a similarity metric discriminatively with application to face verification. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Diego, CA, USA.
60. Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., and Philbin, J. (2015). FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298682 ↗
61. Xuan, H., Stylianou, A., Liu, X., and Pless, R. (2020). Hard negative examples are hard, but useful. ECCV 2020: Computer Vision—ECCV 2020, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-58568-6_8 ↗
62. Gao, L., Zhang, Y., Han, J., and Callan, J. (2021). Scaling Deep Contrastive Learning Batch Size under Memory Limited Setup. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2021.repl4nlp-1.31 ↗
63. Sikaroudi, M., Ghojogh, B., Safarpoor, A., Karray, F., Crowley, M., and Tizhoosh, H.R. (2020). Offline versus Online Triplet Mining based on Extreme Distances of Histopathology Patches. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-030-64556-4_26 ↗
64. Are loss functions all the same?10.1162/089976604773135104 ↗
65. Text Data Augmentation for Deep Learning10.1186/s40537-021-00492-0 ↗
66. A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 ↗
67. Wu, X., Gao, C., Zang, L., Han, J., Wang, Z., and Hu, S. (2021). ESimCSE: Enhanced Sample Building Method for Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Sentence Embedding. arXiv.
68. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer
69. Hard Negative Mixing for Contrastive Learning
70. Mitrovic, J., McWilliams, B., and Rey, M. (2022, August 01). Less Can Be More in Contrastive Learning. In ICBINB@NeurIPS; 2020; pp. 70–75. Available online: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=U2exBrf_SJh.
71. Kingma, D.P., and Dhariwal, P. (2018, January 3–8). Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS, Montréal, QC, Canada.
72. Su, J., Cao, J., Liu, W., and Ou, Y. (2021). Whitening sentence representations for better semantics and faster retrieval. arXiv.
73. Wang, K., Reimers, N., and Gurevych, I. (2021, January 16–20). TSDAE: Using Transformer-based Sequential Denoising Auto-Encoder for Unsupervised Sentence Embedding Learning. Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic.10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.59 ↗
74. Agirre, E., Cer, D., Diab, M., and Gonzalez-Agirre, A. (2012). SemEval-2012 task 6: A pilot on semantic textual similarity. *SEM 2012: The First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics—Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2012), Association for Computational Linguistics. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/S12-1051.
75. Agirre, E., Cer, D., Diab, M., Gonzalez-Agirre, A., and Guo, W. (2013). *SEM 2013 shared task: Semantic textual similarity. Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, Association for Computational Linguistics. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/S13-1004.
76. Agirre, E., Banea, C., Cardie, C., Cer, D., Diab, M., Gonzalez-Agirre, A., Guo, W., Mihalcea, R., Rigau, G., and Wiebe, J. (2014, January 23–24). SemEval-2014 task 10: Multilingual semantic textual similarity. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), Dublin, Ireland. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/S14-2010.10.3115/v1/S14-2010 ↗
77. Agirre, E., Banea, C., Cardie, C., Cer, D., Diab, M., Gonzalez-Agirre, A., Guo, W., Lopez-Gazpio, I., Maritxalar, M., and Mihalcea, R. (2015, January 4–5). SemEval-2015 task 2: Semantic textual similarity, English, Spanish and pilot on interpretability. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), Denver, CO, USA.10.18653/v1/S15-2045 ↗
78. Agirre, E., Banea, C., Cer, D., Diab, M., Gonzalez Agirre, A., Mihalcea, R., Rigau Claramunt, G., and Wiebe, J. (2016, January 16–17). SemEval-2016 task 1: Semantic textual similarity, monolingual and cross-lingual evaluation. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016) Association for Computational Linguistics, San Diego, CA, USA.10.18653/v1/S16-1081 ↗
79. Cer, D., Diab, M., Agirre, E., LopezGazpio, I., and Specia, L. (2017, January 3–4). SemEval-2017 task 1: Semantic textual similarity multilingual and crosslingual focused evaluation. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.18653/v1/S17-2001 ↗
80. Marelli, M., Menini, S., Baroni, M., Entivogli, L., Bernardi, R., and Zamparelli, R. (2014, January 26–31). A SICK cure for the evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Reykjavik, Iceland. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/L14-1314/.
81. Conneau, A., and Kiela, D. (2018, January 7–12). SentEval: An evaluation toolkit for universal sentence representations. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Miyazaki, Japan. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/L18-1269.
82. Pang, B., and Lee, L. (2005, January 25–30). Seeing Stars: Exploiting Class Relationships for Sentiment Categorization with Respect to Rating Scales. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’05), Ann Arbor, MI, USA.10.3115/1219840.1219855 ↗
83. Hu, M., and Liu, B. (2004, January 22–25). Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews. Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Seattle, WA, USA. Available online: https://www.cs.uic.edu/~liub/publications/kdd04-revSummary.pdf.10.1145/1014052.1014073 ↗
84. Pang, B., and Lee, L. (2004, January 21–26). A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts. Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’04), Main Volume, Barcelona, Spain. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/P04-1035.10.3115/1218955.1218990 ↗
85. Annotating Expressions of Opinions and Emotions in Language10.1007/s10579-005-7880-9 ↗
86. Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C.D., Ng, A., and Potts, C. (2013, January 18–21). Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle, WA, USA. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/D13-1170/.
87. Li, X., and Roth, D. (2002, January 26–30). Learning Question Classifiers. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics—Volume 1, COLING, Taipei, Taiwan. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/C02-1150/.10.3115/1072228.1072378 ↗
88. Dolan, B., Quirk, C., and Brockett, C. (2004, January 23–27). Unsupervised Construction of Large Paraphrase Corpora: Exploiting Massively Parallel News Sources. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2004, Geneva, Switzerland. Available online: https://aclanthology.org/C04-1051.10.3115/1220355.1220406 ↗
89. WordNet: An online lexical database10.1093/ijl/3.4.235 ↗
90. Ma, E. (2022, August 01). NLP Augmentation. Available online: https://github.com/makcedward/nlpaug.
91. Damodaran, P. (2022, August 01). Parrot: Paraphrase Generation for NLU. v1.0. Available online: https://github.com/PrithivirajDamodaran/Parrot_Paraphraser.
92. Zhang, Y., Baldridge, J., and He, L. (2019, January 2–7). PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scrambling. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
93. Wieting, J., and Gimpel, K. (2018, January 15–20). ParaNMT-50M: Pushing the Limits of Paraphrastic Sentence Embeddings with Millions of Machine Translations. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Melbourne, Australia.10.18653/v1/P18-1042 ↗
94. Coucke, A., Saade, A., Ball, A., Bluche, T., Caulier, A., Leroy, D., Doumouro, C., Gisselbrecht, T., Caltagirone, F., and Lavril, T. (2018). Snips Voice Platform: An embedded Spoken Language Understanding system for private-by-design voice interfaces. arXiv.